Smashley Young

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
He's been fecking dreadful. Considering I expected him to be England's best player.
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
He's definitely international class and is at England's level, he's just had an awful tournament and has been playing poorly for them. Simple as that really.
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,602
He's definitely international class and is at England's level, he's just had an awful tournament and has been playing poorly for them. Simple as that really.
Pretty much. If he is good enough for United as a squad player he is more than good enough for England.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,792
Location
india
How can he not be international class? See the list of players who have played a decent number of games for England. There are all kinds.

He's not a great player to be honest. I'd say he's fairly good. Does everything pretty well but isn't really great at anything.
 

RyanGoggs

Insists on dating women in public places - for the
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
6,162
Location
The Land of Kernow
At his best he is very good but obviously he isn't playing at that level. We have seen Rooney have terrible England tournaments but you wouldn't question whether he is international class
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
Not really. He has played in the Premier League and CL which are both at a level as high as the euro's IMO. He has been poor but not because he is poor
You're basically saying that because a player plays for us he is automatically good enough for his International team.

Lots of players have played in the PL and CL, does that mean they're good enough?
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
He's not a great player to be honest. I'd say he's fairly good. Does everything pretty well but isn't really great at anything.
Well he's international class because this is a piss poor team by England standards. But that's a good summarisation. I always thought he was an odd purchase at that cost, a good squad player and nowt else.
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,188
Location
Interweb
Young's someone who will look good with better players around him but not good enough to raise an average team
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,188
Location
Interweb
Well he's international class because this is a piss poor team by England standards. But that's a good summarisation. I always thought he was an odd purchase at that cost, a good squad player and nowt else.
He is a great third winger to have in your squad.
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
13,947
Location
Sunny Manc
You're basically saying that because a player plays for us he is automatically good enough for his International team.

Lots of players have played in the PL and CL, does that mean they're good enough?
Young was quite good for England until Hodgson took over.
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,188
Location
Interweb
If he's United class then he is england class. Just not been his tournament
United have much better players than England. Easier to make your mark when your team is dominating. While for England, he has less opportunities, less people in the opposition half to pass or cross to.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
What exactly is the point of your argument, he's having a bad tournament so he's rubbish?
Here's an idea, read? Or do you need me to quote what RyanGoggs said because you can't find the post which is just a few scrolls up?
 

RyanGoggs

Insists on dating women in public places - for the
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
6,162
Location
The Land of Kernow
You're basically saying that because a player plays for us he is automatically good enough for his International team.

Lots of players have played in the PL and CL, does that mean they're good enough?
Name one player in our squad who is a regular (say 30+ games last season) who isn't good enough for international football? I'm not talking about guys like Pogba and Fryers who have played once or twice. He is a guy who Fergie deems an integral part of one of the best teams in the world.
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,188
Location
Interweb
Right, so a 'good squad player' then?
Not exactly. Due to the nature of modern game, the player next in line to come in gets to play a lot of games. Basically he is someone I would be ok with getting a long run in United team if one of Nani/Valencia was injured for some time. My only issue is that he is not good enough to make a mark against big teams.
 

Theon

Lord of the Iron Islands
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Messages
13,289
fecking awful. Should not be on the pitch.

Ox would offer more on the left, at least he would take his man on.
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
13,947
Location
Sunny Manc
You're basically saying that because a player plays for us he is automatically good enough for his International team.

Lots of players have played in the PL and CL, does that mean they're good enough?
Well he's international class because this is a piss poor team by England standards. But that's a good summarisation. I always thought he was an odd purchase at that cost, a good squad player and nowt else.
Right, so a 'good squad player' then?
Here's an idea, read? Or do you need me to quote what RyanGoggs said because you can't find the post which is just a few scrolls up?
Funny, that really does seem to be the gist of what you're saying.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
Name one player in our squad who is a regular (say 30+ games last season) who isn't good enough for international football? I'm not talking about guys like Pogba and Fryers who have played once or twice. He is a guy who Fergie deems an integral part of one of the best teams in the world.
'Integral'?

Hilarious that you add the 30+ games because you know there's quite a few under that bracket who don't get games for this country.

I didn't say Young isn't good enough for England, he's probably good enough for this England because it's a bit shit, but to make the sweeping statement that he's good enough to be an International player purely because he plays for us is daft, especially as, like crappy said, he's surrounded by far superior player at Utd.
 

Aporkalypse

Full Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2003
Messages
7,055
Location
Cyprus
Young has made a few very good chances but his general play has just been way below his best. It isn't as if any England player has covered themselves in glory in this tournament, regardless of the result of this extra time.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
Funny, that really does seem to be the gist of what you're saying.
Sigh. RyanGoggs said a player who plays for us is good enough for his International team, I think that's silly and that's the basis of my argument. I haven't at any point said Young isn't good enough for that England team or that's he's "rubbish". Go away and learn to read.
 

RyanGoggs

Insists on dating women in public places - for the
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
6,162
Location
The Land of Kernow
'Integral'?

Hilarious that you add the 30+ games because you know there's quite a few under that bracket who don't get games for this country.

I didn't say Young isn't good enough for England, he's probably good enough for this England because it's a bit shit, but to make the sweeping statement that he's good enough to be an International player purely because he plays for us is daft, especially as, like crappy said, he's surrounded by far superior player at Utd.
Ok well name one who is considered first team who isn't international class. Don't say de gea because he is probably good enough just unlucky with competition. If he is surrounded by superior players how come he kept Nani and Valencia out of the team at times? He isn't world class but more than good enough to be an international
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
13,947
Location
Sunny Manc
Sigh. RyanGoggs said a player who plays for us is good enough for his International team, I think that's silly and that's the basis of my argument. I haven't at any point said Young isn't good enough for that England team or that's he's "rubbish". Go away and learn to read.
Well, saying he's a 'squad player and nothing else' suggests otherwise.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
Ok well name one who is considered first team who isn't international class. Don't say de gea because he is probably good enough just unlucky with competition. If he is surrounded by superior players how come he kept Nani and Valencia out of the team at times? He isn't world class but more than good enough to be an international
what difference is there between "first-team" and 30+ games a season? :lol:

I didn't say he wasn't good enough for England, in fact my first post said I expected him to be their best player. Your statement that being a part of our team means you are somehow automatically granted this divine right to play at International level is just daft.

Well, saying he's a 'squad player and nothing else' suggests otherwise.
Does it? It suggests he's a squad player at the worlds biggest club, behind 2 of Europe's best wingers in the pecking order.

Yeah, definitely suggesting he's rubbish.
 

RyanGoggs

Insists on dating women in public places - for the
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
6,162
Location
The Land of Kernow
what difference is there between "first-team" and 30+ games a season? :lol:

I didn't say he wasn't good enough for England, in fact my first post said I expected him to be their best player. Your statement that being a part of our team means you are somehow automatically granted this divine right to play at International level is just daft.



Does it? It suggests he's a squad player at the worlds biggest club, behind 2 of Europe's best wingers in the pecking order.

Yeah, definitely suggesting he's rubbish.
I never said he had the divine right to play for England just that he is good enough. Form should dictate who plays and as I said he is out of form so shouldnt play however I still believe he is "good enough" at this level. I can't imagine Ferguson signing a player AND play them as much as young has if he didn't believe him to be bare minimum international quality
 

AVARiCE

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
3,273
Location
West London, UK
Young was great behind the striker in the warm-up games. Now he's been shoved into what I can only describe as a "defensive winger" role.

It's really not difficult to see why he's struggling. That and the reality that the movement around him is not too dissimilar to a London bus in rush hour traffic.

His crossing's not been too bad but England haven't got much of an aerial threat so it's wasted. Rooney could've scored from a pearl of a cross in the last game, I seem to recall.

Don't get me wrong, he's having a bit of a shocker but how this can be used to conclude he's rubbish or not good enough for international football is beyond me.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
I never said he had the divine right to play for England just that he is good enough. Form should dictate who plays and as I said he is out of form so shouldnt play however I still believe he is "good enough" at this level. I can't imagine Ferguson signing a player AND play them as much as young has if he didn't believe him to be bare minimum international quality
But you said he's good enough because he plays for us.

Yeah I'm sure what Fergie thinks when he signs a player is "will he be good enough to play internationally?"
 

RyanGoggs

Insists on dating women in public places - for the
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
6,162
Location
The Land of Kernow
But you said he's good enough because he plays for us.

Yeah I'm sure what Fergie thinks when he signs a player is "will he be good enough to play internationally?"
Not because he is good enough to play internationally, more that there is a certain standard needed at international level that a player needs to be at to play for United. A player needs certain quality to play at either level and I would say that level is slightly higher to play for united than England. We just have high standards
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
Not because he is good enough to play internationally, more that there is a certain standard needed at international level that a player needs to be at to play for United. A player needs certain quality to play at either level and I would say that level is slightly higher to play for united than England. We just have high standards
We've had lots of players over the years who wouldn't get into most England squads. Young and Welbeck have been very lucky in that this is a poor, poor squad by England standards.
 

RyanGoggs

Insists on dating women in public places - for the
Joined
May 10, 2011
Messages
6,162
Location
The Land of Kernow
We've had lots of players over the years who wouldn't get into most England squads. Young and Welbeck have been very lucky in that this is a poor, poor squad by England standards.
Like who? From say the past 15 years