Loublaze
ATLien
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2009
- Messages
- 16,593
Your guess is right. Before my time but i'll watch it somedayI am guessing you never seen Animal House
Your guess is right. Before my time but i'll watch it somedayI am guessing you never seen Animal House
Dennis Rodman was, is and will always be a cnut in my book. He can shove his "friendship" with the fat walrus up his ass.I guess the ball is in Dennis Rodman's court.
Yeah and someday, the little cnut should get one hell of a beating that he and even his ancestors will feel it in their bones. This is the kind of cnut against who a head-to-head is not enough, but a severe beating is.This isn't going to end well for NK. They think they can be this little runt of country, going around throwing out idle threats, knowing their big brother China has their back. But not anymore. China's economy cannot afford the stupidity of North Korea, they're slowly backing off from them and rightly so. Yeah, USA is indebted to China in the TRILLIONS. But that means fcuk all when a country of 1 billion goes belly up and they have no western trade partners.
Went off on a tangent there. My point being, North Korea is that little cnut who thinks he's hard yet has soon as you go head to head with him, he backs off, tail between his legs knowing everyone in the class thinks he's a cnut.
Considering that worked out when Stuxnet was dug inside the software that was sent for Iranian nuclear program in 2007, nothing's impossible. If it was for me, the US should try hacking into North Korea's utilities and even their nuclear plants. Blackmail them with the threat of provoking massive chaos in Pyongyang.I'm excited to see USA respond, but what can they do realistically? Genuine question.
That shortsighted if they do. Things will only work if it hurts the NK people immediately. <_<Push for further sanctions is all they will do.
It is the only real overt option they have. If they plan to hack North Korea back it won't be any time within the next 2 years (too obvious) and we won't hear about it anytime soon.Considering that worked out when Stuxnet was dug inside the software that was sent for Iranian nuclear program in 2007, nothing's impossible. If it was for me, the US should try hacking into North Korea's utilities and even their nuclear plants. Blackmail them with the threat of provoking massive chaos in Pyongyang.
That shortsighted if they do. Things will only work if it hurts the NK people immediately. <_<
Is that good or bad?I read this post and was ultimately disappointed to find out that @Crackers was not the one to post it.
The main problem is that North Korea is basically a closed network, both digitally and physically. Iran is significantly more connected than North Korea so cyberwarfare is a lot easier.Considering that worked out when Stuxnet was dug inside the software that was sent for Iranian nuclear program in 2007, nothing's impossible. If it was for me, the US should try hacking into North Korea's utilities and even their nuclear plants. Blackmail them with the threat of provoking massive chaos in Pyongyang.
That shortsighted if they do. Things will only work if it hurts the NK people immediately. <_<
Madness. They can't threaten punishment against millions of innocent people over this. Any retaliation will have to be directed towards the perpetrators.Considering that worked out when Stuxnet was dug inside the software that was sent for Iranian nuclear program in 2007, nothing's impossible. If it was for me, the US should try hacking into North Korea's utilities and even their nuclear plants. Blackmail them with the threat of provoking massive chaos in Pyongyang.
That shortsighted if they do. Things will only work if it hurts the NK people immediately. <_<
So basically North Korea is Jack WilshireWent off on a tangent there. My point being, North Korea is that little cnut who thinks he's hard yet has soon as you go head to head with him, he backs off, tail between his legs knowing everyone in the class thinks he's a cnut.
Considering that North Korea have attacked both South Korea and the US with cybertattacks, I don't see the point of waiting instead of dropping the hammer right on them. Who would dare blaming the US for making that "little cnut" (borrowing the previous analogy) taste his own medicine? From what I have seen in my days as a kid in school, little wannabe hard boys often end up getting thrashed by the real top dog.It is the only real overt option they have. If they plan to hack North Korea back it won't be any time within the next 2 years (too obvious) and we won't hear about it anytime soon.
That's another guy who deserves a genuine kicking. (End of off-topic)So basically North Korea is Jack Wilshire
You're not really comparing this to your days at school are you?Considering that North Korea have attacked both South Korea and the US with cybertattacks, I don't see the point of waiting instead of dropping the hammer right on them. Who would dare blaming the US for making that "little cnut" (borrowing the previous analogy) taste his own medicine? From what I have seen in my days as a kid in school, little wannabe hard boys often end up getting thrashed by the real top dog.
That's another guy who deserves a genuine kicking. (End of off-topic)
Posted Wibble's video on FB and Twitter as well. Hoping it will get viral.
Er... Yeah so I'm guessing you don't live in Seoul then.I don't see the point of waiting instead of dropping the hammer right on them.
I'm aware of that situation, but can Seoul afford to live in that climate of fear any longer? Also I don't see why South Korean cyber-warfare divisions cannot launch anything of their own to disrupt something big on the other side. It's not as if South Korea don't have the resources to fight and make a big hit in this kind of warfare.Er... Yeah so I'm guessing you don't live in Seoul then.
North Carolina?South Korea don't want to push North Korea into a violent confrontation and NC aren't very vulnerable to hacking as they aren't connected to the outside world much.
Just not for citizens. The govt and it's lackey's sure would have it. Even govt leaders need access to porn.I thought they didn't have the internet in North Korea.
I think if you are expecting much more than sanctions you are kidding yourself. America already has its hands full with oversees military support/action and no Western country can be seen to be openly hacking another state (even though they all have covertly).Considering that North Korea have attacked both South Korea and the US with cybertattacks, I don't see the point of waiting instead of dropping the hammer right on them. Who would dare blaming the US for making that "little cnut" (borrowing the previous analogy) taste his own medicine? From what I have seen in my days as a kid in school, little wannabe hard boys often end up getting thrashed by the real top dog.
Explain me that. What would go wrong if that happens while China and North Korea are not shy about it?and no Western country can be seen to be openly hacking another state (even though they all have covertly).
The CIA should set every computer in N Korea to meatspin.Most forms of retaliation would look a bit schoolyard-ish wouldn't it?
At the same time they shouldn't really let themselves be bullied and shown up, as well as threats to their people be made.
That just shows the hypocrisy from the Republicans and their supporters. Although not surprising as they often call for video games to be banned, rap music to be banned etc, usually when defending the sale and availability of guns.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It's a tough one and a bit of a lose/lose for Obama/America. He can't retaliate with force, silly and completely over the top reaction. He can't hack them back (although they are always doing it covertly) as it's tit for tat and childish, not to mention illegal. More sanctions will only hit the poor suffering people. It's quite hard to see what can actually be done. I think the best option would be to make a film ridiculing The Supreme Leader KJU and mocking his way of life whilst pointing out how his people live.Most forms of retaliation would look a bit schoolyard-ish wouldn't it?
At the same time they shouldn't really let themselves be bullied and shown up, as well as threats to their people be made.
Buy the film off sony and make it free for TV channels to use and available onlineI'm excited to see USA respond, but what can they do realistically? Genuine question.
Even without the Republican furor that is a movie that would have struggled to find an audience. It would have been relegated to primarily arthouse theaters regardless.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
If you asked China whether they have ever done it, their answer would be no. No state that is respected on the world stage will ever admit to doing something that is counter trust and illegal (look at America's stance on bugging the Heads of State of their foreign allies) as at the very least it would further legitimize all of those hackers who have been prosecuted for hacking into American intelligence agencies files (although they all know the truth and hypocrisy behind it already).Explain me that. What would go wrong if that happens while China and North Korea are not shy about it?
Its amazing misguided. Imagine a rupublican backed company making a movie about killing Obama. Or a German company making a film about killing the Israeli leader.It seems misguided to make a movie based on the assassination of a living person/leader that has the potential to offend an entire nation and an unpredictable one at that. They could just as easily have made the movie about a fictional country loosely based on something real. Did they really have to kill him in a huge fireball? It was designed from the start to provoke a response.
Thank you Canada for "giving" us Seth Rogen, now we have our national security threatened to protect his useless movie.
The Second Amendment to the US Constitution protects the right of citizens to 'keep and bear arms'. It obviously has nothing to do with freedom of speech.That just shows the hypocrisy from the Republicans and their supporters. Although not surprising as they often call for video games to be banned, rap music to be banned etc, usually when defending the sale and availability of guns.
And if they have a movie showing a sniper killing Obama you think the democrats would be quiet? We are talking about a comedy about the worst dictator since Hitler.That just shows the hypocrisy from the Republicans and their supporters. Although not surprising as they often call for video games to be banned, rap music to be banned etc, usually when defending the sale and availability of guns.
It's a tough one and a bit of a lose/lose for Obama/America. He can't retaliate with force, silly and completely over the top reaction. He can't hack them back (although they are always doing it covertly) as it's tit for tat and childish, not to mention illegal. More sanctions will only hit the poor suffering people. It's quite hard to see what can actually be done. I think the best option would be to make a film ridiculing The Supreme Leader KJU and mocking his way of life whilst pointing out how his people live.
What's he done so far to indicate that? He's a horrible, evil dictator but he doesn't compare to your Mao Zedongs, Pots and a few others in terms of being the worst dictator since Hitler. Unless of course by worst you mean he's utterly useless, in which case I'd agree.And if they have a movie showing a sniper killing Obama you think the democrats would be quiet? We are talking about a comedy about the worst dictator since Hitler.