It looks like the Stormtroopers had hand to hand combat training based on his fight in Cornwall, and by the time he fought Rey he was injured and she used the force or some shit to be good, IDK. Star Wars.How come Ren isn't particularly good at fighting? Finn did quite well against him and Rey be at him albeit he was injured. But still... He's the new face of the dark side FFS!
Well he's very young, early 20s? I didn't pay enough attention when Han was talking about what happened at Luke's Academy. But who is he meant to duel with and hone his skills? You can see during the film that he hadn't fully committed to the dark side until he killed Han. So you have a character who's basically an apprentice still take on someone who clearly had more natural ability. The fella was also badly wounded, I took the punching the side of his stomach to stop him from passing out. To give him an adrenaline push. He was also an emotional wreck which is never a good combo with the force and he was trying to recruit her.How come Ren isn't particularly good at fighting? Finn did quite well against him and Rey be at him albeit he was injured. But still... He's the new face of the dark side FFS!
Yeah i think they need to put more effort into the locations in the next films. Instead of Desert planet, Snow planet, Forest planet repeat.It didn't help that you can easily identify some of the locations either. I liked the bit where they went on a day trip to a pub in Keswick, but my mate said he questioned why Luke had retired to an old tin mine in Cornwall.
If Rey is Luke's daughter, then it isn't random at all.That still doesn't excuse the narrative problem, whereby they only find it because R2-D2 randomly decides to wake up of his own accord, no thanks to any of our protagonists, after the battle is done, just to further the plot.
I mean, if the whole point of that mega-deathstar was to wipe them all out, wouldn't it have been more pertinent to give them these co-ordinates before this potentially happened? His map showing alarm call is either completely random (and therefore bad writing) or he's got some kind of agency, but one that wasn't important enough to bring up before he was potentially destroyed.
One thing that the prequels did right. Not always in execution mind you, but at least there was some variety attempted.Yeah i think they need to put more effort into the locations in the next films. Instead of Desert planet, Snow planet, Forest planet repeat.
It was alright doing that shit in the 70's and 80's but with CGI today they could make some cool looking alien planets.
The whole map thing as you say sort of made sense and maybe i missed something but how did anyone get the map of Luke's location in the first place?The map bit is kind of sensical, in the sense that when they completed it there's still probably about 100 planets in that part of the galaxy. There was even a red line that went straight to the planet when complete. Imagine I told you to go find some random guy in the USA, I didn't know where he was, I just knew he was in the USA. You'd have no idea where to start.
So yeah it's not the best part of the story, but it's not that ridiculous unless there was only one planet in that entire section of the galaxy.
Or maybe he did exactly that? A lot of the logic in this film boils down to "they'll explain it in the next movie probably".It's not like he jumped in a ship and flew off to some distant part of the galaxy to exile himself to get away from everyone, and then sent someone an email with part of a map showing where he was.
Interesting. If it means another SW movie with McGregor on it, I am all for this theory being true.
Yeah as you say it was the execution where they went wrong, back then not many movies had that much CGI and i think it was jarring for most people but it's common place today. But for all their faults the prequels were very creative and tried to introduce lots of new ideas.One thing that the prequels did right. Not always in execution mind you, but at least there was some variety attempted.
Maybe mate i hope it's explained at some point as it's a pretty big plot hole considering this whole movie was based around that map.Or maybe he did exactly that? A lot of the logic in this film boils down to "they'll explain it in the next movie probably".
There's a big difference in CGI landscapes and CGI everything which is what the Prequels did.Yeah as you say it was the execution where they went wrong, back then not many movies had that much CGI and i think it was jarring for most people but it's common place today. But for all their faults the prequels were very creative and tried to introduce lots of new ideas.
I really hope after this movie everyone has gotten over their aversion to CGI in star wars movies and we don't get the same landscapes over and over again.
Maybe mate i hope it's explained at some point as it's a pretty big plot hole considering this whole movie was based around that map.
Well thats sort of my point mate, we don't need everything CGI but using some to make interesting new planets would be nice. They've done the Desert/Ice/Forest planets to death at this point, there must be other different types of planets in the galaxy surely.There's a big difference in CGI landscapes and CGI everything which is what the Prequels did.
I sank in my chair with complete love when they entered that cantina. Pretty much everything in that looked real. Didn't spot much CGI during that sequence and no annoying singing alien.
You don't like singing aliens?There's a big difference in CGI landscapes and CGI everything which is what the Prequels did.
I sank in my chair with complete love when they entered that cantina. Pretty much everything in that looked real. Didn't spot much CGI during that sequence and no annoying singing alien.
But my point is that people weren't upset about CGI being used for locations (although you can still spot em a mile off). The issue is that the prequels had CGI in the foreground and background.Well thats sort of my point mate, we don't need everything CGI but using some to make interesting new planets would be nice. They've done the Desert/Ice/Forest planets to death at this point, there must be other different types of planets in the galaxy surely.
So he would've happily been destroyed, without relaying this important information, to even Luke's sister, despite him and BB8 both being in the same room, with both halves of the map, for the last hour of the film, unless Rey just happened to have turned up? That sounds counterproductive at the very least..If Rey is Luke's daughter, then it isn't random at all.
Yeah that was the best thing JJ did tbf. Bound to help the actors too. Must be easier to pull off all that hokey dialogue if you can see what you're supposed to be talking too.There's a big difference in CGI landscapes and CGI everything which is what the Prequels did.
I sank in my chair with complete love when they entered that cantina. Pretty much everything in that looked real. Didn't spot much CGI during that sequence and no annoying singing alien.
He was the last Jedi, he could do what he liked tbf. Might also explain why he failed epicly to teach Ben.I thought Jedi's weren't supposed to love and have sex and shit so how could Rey be Luke's daughter if he's this paragon of the light side that he's put up to be?
Thats a common theory but it's not entirely true though, the first one alone had more practical models, sets and miniatures than the three original movies combined. And yet people still think it's all CGI. The whole pod race bar i think some of the alien pilots was mostly models. The water planet scenes in the second one was mostly models filmed then upscaled and even in the third one all the scenes on the Cave and Lava planets at the end were all miniatures. The prequels were some of the first big movies to combine practical and digital effects.But my point is that people weren't upset about CGI being used for locations (although you can still spot em a mile off). The issue is that the prequels had CGI in the foreground and background.
Lord of the Rings managed some amazing locations using Bigatures to give the foreground a real vibe. While using CGI for the background. That worked so well. Into Darkness made a red jungle for the opening sequence but CGI'd the rest and the contrast between real and CGI was jarring.
Nobody else in the galaxy has a lightsaber besides Luke, that will have been his first ever duel against one probably.How come Ren isn't particularly good at fighting? Finn did quite well against him and Rey be at him albeit he was injured. But still... He's the new face of the dark side FFS!
Didn't Jacen turn dark only after he got tortured from those aliens (and when heard about Anakin Solo's death)? Also, IIRC, he killed Mara Jade who was his master (similarily how Vader killed Kenobi) as the final act in turning dark. Rey saw a women in her vision which I thought should be her mum, and if Rey is really Luke's daughter, then it would make sense for her mum to be killed in that massacre, which would be a nice analogy to Jade's death.so..
in the books Ren is 'Jacen', son of the Solos. He has a twin sister. He's the star pupil at the Jedi academy but is obsessed with his grandfather. He meets a Sith lady, who secretly grooms him to the dark side. He severs all ties with Lukes training. She tells him that he needs an apprentice so he starts training Luke's son 'Ben' as his apprentice.
As part of his secret Sith training, Jacen is told that he needs to kill Luke (as far as I remember), though he's still a bit torn, hes swaying to the dark side more
This is where the movie is coming from, though its all a bit mixed up. I hope that they show the backstory a bit more.
Also, the movies borrow a lot of things from the KOTOR games. Kylo's mask is almost identical to Revan's, the whole Luke dissapearing and everyone searching for him is very similiar to Revan's. Some people even theorized that Luke is on Lehon, the planet which Revan got the secrets of the Star Forge. The Star Killer is identical to the Star Forge. Not to mention most of the force powers that were used in the movie were introduced in those games as well. Force Statis, Mind Control, etc. There is also an ongoing theory that Rey's memory has been wiped, just like Revan was. Malachor and it's destruction are taken straight from the games.so..
in the books Ren is 'Jacen', son of the Solos. He has a twin sister. He's the star pupil at the Jedi academy but is obsessed with his grandfather. He meets a Sith lady, who secretly grooms him to the dark side. He severs all ties with Lukes training. She tells him that he needs an apprentice so he starts training Luke's son 'Ben' as his apprentice.
As part of his secret Sith training, Jacen is told that he needs to kill Luke (as far as I remember), though he's still a bit torn, hes swaying to the dark side more
This is where the movie is coming from, though its all a bit mixed up. I hope that they show the backstory a bit more.
Several of the main characters in the prequels were CGI though, mix that in with CGI extras and CGI environments and you lose all sense of immersion. Immersion being a word we use a lot in the games industry because it's so important.Thats a common theory but it's not entirely true though, the first one alone had more practical models, sets and miniatures than the three original movies combined. And yet people still think it's all CGI. The whole pod race bar i think some of the alien pilots was mostly models. The water planet scenes in the second one was mostly models filmed then upscaled and even in the third one all the scenes on the Cave and Lava planets at the end were all miniatures. The prequels were some of the first big movies to combine practical and digital effects.
http://metro.co.uk/2015/07/23/10-re...quel-trilogy-deserves-another-chance-5309490/
But it also had more CGI than people were used to seeing at that point in time which was my point, people seen some CGI and assumed it was all CGI. These days you have movies like Avatar where it's 70-80% CGI and no one really batted an eyelid.
Lucas and his company back then were inventing and working on visual effects techniques that most of the CGI these days is based on. They probably went too far for the time but at least they were being creative.
Well he's very young, early 20s? I didn't pay enough attention when Han was talking about what happened at Luke's Academy. But who is he meant to duel with and hone his skills? You can see during the film that he hadn't fully committed to the dark side until he killed Han. So you have a character who's basically an apprentice still take on someone who clearly had more natural ability. The fella was also badly wounded, I took the punching the side of his stomach to stop him from passing out. To give him an adrenaline push. He was also an emotional wreck which is never a good combo with the force and he was trying to recruit her.
What we'll see with Rey IMO is him becoming darker, more powerful as the films progress. Then we get to witness a far better story arc for that character.
The only bit that annoyed me during that scene was the ground breaking up. Also it delivered for me the best bit when Rey force pulled the light saber. That was perfect.
Well it was obvious he was pretty good at using force moves. But don't think there are many people with lightsabers left to do duelling practice!Awww come on, surely lightsaber dueling can't be all that different to wielding swords?! The man is set to become the new Vader, surely, he'd be more natural? That said, yes he's wet behind the ears and no doubt set to become bigger and badder next film.
Well yeah i'll give you that, i don't think the technology was quite there yet back then to do full CG characters and make them believable. And Jar Jar being an annoying prick didn't help people warm to the idea.Several of the main characters in the prequels were CGI though, mix that in with CGI extras and CGI environments and you lose all sense of immersion. Immersion being a word we use a lot in the games industry because it's so important.
It's why this film worked so much better. The real to CGI ratio was improved and therefore it's easier to get immersed.
It's one of my pet hates about the Hobbit films but I won't rant about those in here!!
If Rey's memory has really been wiped (and it looks quite likely), then it is basically the same plot as Revan's.Also, the movies borrow a lot of things from the KOTOR games. Kylo's mask is almost identical to Revan's, the whole Luke dissapearing and everyone searching for him is very similiar to Revan's. Some people even theorized that Luke is on Lehon, the planet which Revan got the secrets of the Star Forge. The Star Killer is identical to the Star Forge. Not to mention most of the force powers that were used in the movie were introduced in those games as well. Force Statis, Mind Control, etc. There is also an ongoing theory that Rey's memory has been wiped, just like Revan was. Malachor and it's destruction are taken straight from the games.
Also, is it just me or many of the sound effects from the movie are taken directly from KOTOR?
All in all, even if the EU was wiped, they are still taking things very heavily from it, which I'm quite happy about. The EU had some absolutely amazing stories, better than the OT even.
In an early version of the script Ren reportedly had a droid that sounds an awful lot like HK47 which probably supports your theory.Also, the movies borrow a lot of things from the KOTOR games. Kylo's mask is almost identical to Revan's, the whole Luke dissapearing and everyone searching for him is very similiar to Revan's. Some people even theorized that Luke is on Lehon, the planet which Revan got the secrets of the Star Forge. The Star Killer is identical to the Star Forge. Not to mention most of the force powers that were used in the movie were introduced in those games as well. Force Statis, Mind Control, etc. There is also an ongoing theory that Rey's memory has been wiped, just like Revan was. Malachor and it's destruction are taken straight from the games.
Also, is it just me or many of the sound effects from the movie are taken directly from KOTOR?
All in all, even if the EU was wiped, they are still taking things very heavily from it, which I'm quite happy about. The EU had some absolutely amazing stories, better than the OT even.
Yeah, it's a silly name. He did seem like he's got the potential to be quite fearsome, but then when you get that name it's difficult to take him at all seriously. While I don't mind non-human type villains, I'd have rather something closer to the Emperor than a CGI character.I couldn't keep a straight face whenever anyone mentioned the name Snoke. I mean, come on, that's a ridiculous name, even for Star Wars. He also didn't look like he fit in this film, aesthetically.
I actually thought Kylo Ren was quite good - up until he got easily beaten by magic plotting - but then I've probably got a slightly different view of acceptable masculinity to rednev.