RyRy11
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2014
- Messages
- 1,596
He was at Wolves?Been a while since I've seen Sir Bobby at a game?
He was at Wolves?Been a while since I've seen Sir Bobby at a game?
Rather him than OleI would have taken him over the four we have so far but pep was always the guy to me. Not sure who I would take now seeing as both of those options are dead, Poch seems like a good option but I’m still not sold on him.
The most significant difference is that while there are proofs of van Gaal and Mourinho´s failure, there are none of Poch´s success.The difference is that Poch seems to prefer a playstyle that is not outdated, and based on the progress Tottenham had without spending stupid amount in the market were able to improve the team through training and coaching... Two elements that would make him less impacted by having an assumed incompetent organization above him fumbling around in the transfermarket.
Going from an extreme possession-oriented manager like LVG to the complete opposite with Mourinho does not make sense... Would be equivalent to manufacturing pens one year and then producing pencils the next. While they are both used for writing, the manufacturing processes and materials used are completely different.
Ridiculing makes it look like you have an argument.Random bolded words make me look like I have a point.
No it doesn't, it's just an eye sore when it's used so liberally for something that doesn't require emphasis.Ridiculing makes it look like you have an argument.
The bolded words helps the reader. If you don´t care to read the whole thing, you can easily jump to the arguments. I should actually a added a couple more. It´s not a bad way to present a longer text, the arguments we may have on the Glazers aside.
That really depends on whether you think Poch should have the won the PL and CL with spurs or southampton. I suppose a FA Cup would have been nice.The most significant difference is that while there are proofs of van Gaal and Mourinho´s failure, there are none of Poch´s success.
How much is the debt now compared to when they put the club into debt?Initially when they bought the Club with this PIK debt perhaps. But the "campaign" did not stop after the loan was managed downward, nor it stopped after Utd went back to stock market hence further reduce debt. The goal post might have been shifted but I am pretty sure it was the same group.
He could of won it the year Leicester did, they were in it until almost the end.That really depends on whether you think Poch should have the won the PL and CL with spurs or southampton. I suppose a FA Cup would have been nice.
True, but that really applies to every big club that season. But it's a fair enough critism, on the other hand Leiceister sacked Raineri the season after they won. Poch until his final season at spurs has managed to deliver consistently what all our big spending managers post-fergie have failed to do. We could hire Raineri because he won the league with Leicester but there is a reason we are not isn't there?He could of won it the year Leicester did, they were in it until almost the end.
Succes is relative to the expectations of the club. For the worst PL clubs, not being relegated is a succes.The most significant difference is that while there are proofs of van Gaal and Mourinho´s failure, there are none of Poch´s success.
True it was a horror show for the usual top 6 that season. Spurs and funnily enough Arsenal (who ended up 2nd place) were the only one's fighting that year. Chelsea had their collapse which saw Jose fired, us and LVG were too busy putting the fans to sleep and City were just scrapping for 4th (last day, beat us on goal difference again ).True, but that really applies to every big club that season. But it's a fair enough critism, on the other hand Leiceister sacked Raineri the season after they won. Poch until his final season at spurs has managed to deliver consistently what all our big spending managers post-fergie have failed to do. We could hire Raineri because he won the league with Leicester but there is a reason we are not isn't there?
Whatever.No it doesn't, it's just an eye sore when it's used so liberally for something that doesn't require emphasis.
No, that´s not what I meant. My point was more, who can be certain about the future. When you are judging someone´s decisions by hindsight only, you bear great risk of being unfair.Succes is relative to the expectations of the club. For the worst PL clubs, not being relegated is a succes.
I am not geared to answer your question so can only quote what is on the web.How much is the debt now compared to when they put the club into debt?