Enigma_87
You know who
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 27,659
yeah, the snake reverses each round, IMO.Unless I misunderstood it...
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
yeah, the snake reverses each round, IMO.Unless I misunderstood it...
yeah, the snake reverses each round, IMO.
@Edgar Allan Pillow , is that what it means?2nd reinforcements start from the top.
I actually wouldn't mind either way, cause I have many options but not sure exactly which path to take.@Edgar Allan Pillow , is that what it means?
If it does, my apologies. You can see how easy it is to misunderstand that
Aye, don't mind the two consecutive picks as well with hopefully a few good drops from you lads.I actually wouldn't mind either way, cause I have many options but not sure exactly which path to take.
and on side note for the final would there be two picks or one?
Cruyff said:Van Hanegem has one advantage over me. When I have a bad game I am useless. When Van Hanegem has a bad game, he rolls up his sleeves and starts tackling.
@Joga Bonito is truly back
tough night out Edgar?Tomorrow unless onenil is free. I'm dying...
Peak van Hanegem and peak Joga .
van Hanegem needs no selling or exposure whatsover, but I recall him coming under some fire in one of the recent drafts where his dynamism and mobility came into question, which seemed a bit inexplicable to me personally.
Either way a cracking game altogether with van Hanegem squaring up against familiar rival tandem of Cruyff-Neeskens. The latter, one of the most dynamic B2Bs of all time and van Hanegem had a momentous battle on the pitch with both being tasked with minding each other. Imo, van Hanegem came up trumps in this encounter, with Neeskens having a silent game, although of course it did mean that some of van Hanegem's offensive impetus was blunted.
Cheers, was a great and disciplined performance from him. Shame there aren't any available matches between Feyenoord and Ajax from the late 60s and early 70s.Peak van Hanegem and peak Joga .
It was not raised as an issue, as the results stand. But to avoid future controversies, please consider yourself as his AM for purposes of this draft.I’m not his AM but have answered questions he’s had on some players and bounced some ideas around with potential picks (as happens all the time). First time I’ve ever seen it raised as an issue was by @Ecstatic
Fair enough. Happy to do that to avoid any issue.It was not raised as an issue, as the results stand. But to avoid future controversies, please consider yourself as his AM for purposes of this draft.
It'll be impossible to define shades to an AM role based on how much a AM contributes, and we've had cases where a person signed as AM and then disappears awol with no contribution.... so let's just avoid potential meltdowns.
Wouldn't have been an issue usually if not for your timing. I remember seeing the score 5 mins before the poll closed and was level.Fair enough. Happy to do that to avoid any issue.
As an FYI though I’ve always asked people questions during drafts, think the last draft I asked about five when @2mufc0 and I were experimenting with some weird systems. Conversations / advice will go on all the time.
With that said happy to do as you’ve suggested above and agree the line can be quie fine at times (not that I think it particularly is here).
Nothing wrong with that, but would be better to declare it in thread, so everyone involved is on same page.As an FYI though I’ve always asked people questions during drafts, think the last draft I asked about five when @2mufc0 and I were experimenting with some weird systems. Conversations / advice will go on all the time.
Sorry, this week's unexpectedly hectic, I'll be on and offline at odd timesTomorrow unless onenil is free. I'm dying...
Erm I’m on holiday for a couple of days. Could do Thursday or Friday, or failing that Monday or any day bar Tuesday next week.@Gio
I would be okay with the below three dates (in order of preference)
1. 18th, wednesday
2. 17th tuesday
3. 23rd tuesday
Let me know if any of these work for you.
Lets do Friday then.Erm I’m on holiday for a couple of days. Could do Thursday or Friday, or failing that Monday or any day bar Tuesday next week.
sound let's do Thursday.Either of those days work for me.