Just sent him to EAP as my first pick
Just sent him to EAP as my first pick
Had him pinned down as a sub.Roberto Donadoni.
Just ignore the goalkeeper till the last pick and there's no disadvantage with the sub and there are more than enough great goalkeepers available.Odd number of pick means that those closer to the bottom will be at a disadvantage when it comes to subs.
I already picked a keeper.Just ignore the goalkeeper till the last pick and there's no disadvantage with the sub and there are more than enough great goalkeepers available.
Kohler Xavi and Shevchenko? Well it might not be as good as what I got but I don't think there's any room for complaining, top picks in each round imo
Not perfect, but I'm quite happy with it, given the players my DoF brought in for me.
Kohler is great, but while Xavi and Sheva are great players, they're not the ones I would have picked if given the choice. Don't forget Brolin either, who was actually quite good but most will only know as a fattie.Kohler Xavi and Shevchenko? Well it might not be as good as what I got but I don't think there's any room for complaining, top picks in each round imo
The cost of pfaffing with that picking.Had him pinned down as a sub.
Your call to take my Rinat away What happenned with "no one gives a shit about goalkeepers"Odd number of pick means that those closer to the bottom will be at a disadvantage when it comes to subs.
Not perfect, but I'm quite happy with it, given the players my DoF brought in for me.
I wanted him mainly for his versatility though he's terribly underrated on here.The cost of pfaffing with that picking.
If everyone left keepers last according to the "keepers don't matter" conventional wisdom? Sure I would have.You wouldn't have gotten Dasayev.
For a second I thought you're talking about Pfaff, which kinda confused me, like a lotI wanted him mainly for his versatility though he's terribly underrated on here.
For a second I thought you're talking about Pfaff, which kinda confused me, like a lot
Brilliant picture.
Thanks for clarifying that actually, I was still confused.For a second I thought you're talking about Pfaff, which kinda confused me, like a lot
3. Annah
Who is in yours? Scirea is the only good pick all along(except Tardelli who was sent to Argentina) but everybody had great defenders. Cocu was alright, far from the best but far from the worst and Rossi is again in the middle.
But he's unpicked and I honestly thought he's younger, didn't expect him to be eligible. Also MJJ won .There was no need to delete it. Let's all laugh at @MJJ with no stated reason anyway
He was top 2 or 3 in legacy rounds.Cocu was alright, far from the best
I didn't get Effenberg, I got Gerrard as a midfielder. The DoF pick you are missing there is Raúl.Who has been the top three most lucky, and the bottom three - most unlucky?
Indeed but still far from someone like Enzo who was the best.He was top 2 or 3 in legacy rounds.
So you are the third unluckiest manager because you got the second best instead of the best? feck off.Indeed but still far from someone like Enzo who was the best.
I suggested to use him as a left wingback, I actually think he would have been an awesome wingback.I didn't get Effenberg, I got Gerrard as a midfielder. The DoF pick you are missing there is Raúl.
Annah got some great breaks, unlucky to lose Tardelli but Cocu was one of the better legacy picks, not his fault he makes little sense in the team created thereafter.
That doesn't make Cocu a liability, it only makes Viva a runaway winner (not Stobz, who was lucky not to lose his good DoFs but had to live with the challenge of fitting Camoranesi).Indeed but still far from someone like Enzo who was the best.
No, because I was the sole loser of the TBola round. Prior to that I was on the positive side of things. The rest who lost DOF players, lost defenders.So you are the third unluckiest manager because you got the second best instead of the best? feck off.
I suggested to use him as a left wingback, I actually think he would have been an awesome wingback.
Tardelli was far from being the best player to go in T-bola, let alone the most crucial to a team. And it's not just me arguing your third place, I actually think once I lost Gerrard my only issue is the rigidity of Ljungberg/Raúl. Other managers have had to contend with worse things happening. e.g. crappy getting Mary Poppins, he was far and away the striker I didn't want, or Skizzo getting Solskjaer and Sánchez which pretty much nailed his frontline. Then MJJ/Theon had the relative misfortune of adding Rivaldo to Bochini and Dalglish, which looked a complete nightmare at the time until T-Bola helped out with that.No, because I was the sole loser of the TBola round. Prior to that I was on the positive side of things. The rest who lost DOF players, lost defenders.
Yup, Skizzo should probably have been the third in the unluck one.Tardelli was far from being the best player to go in T-bola, let alone the most crucial to a team. And it's not just me arguing your third place, I actually think once I lost Gerrard my only issue is the rigidity of Ljungberg/Raúl. Other managers have had to contend with worse things happening. e.g. crappy getting Mary Poppins, he was far and away the striker I didn't want, or Skizzo getting Solskjaer and Sánchez which pretty much nailed his frontline. Then MJJ/Theon had the relative misfortune of adding Rivaldo to Bochini and Dalglish, which looked a complete nightmare at the time until T-Bola helped out with that.
Losing Tardelli is nowhere near the biggest problem I can imagine, truckloads of competent midfielders knocking about at the time as well, even now.
Not to mention he lost the best LB in the draft to T-Bola.Yup, Skizzo should probably have been the third in the unluck one.