Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Fair enough, but why would you be wiping a dead horse’s arse to begin with
It is quite absorbent and at least that would give it a purpose.
I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't come out now
Sources close to our reporter have indicated that it is believed "Rashford sleeps nude in an oxygen which he says gives him sexual powers"
Young, intelligent, good looking black male with charisma who is gun hot at the people’s game and is one of the great young high profiles philanthropists of our time… it’s everything they want to be and their wives wanted to be with. No wonder they’re shit scared!
The Spectator's figures have been growing over the last couple of years. I wonder if Rashford had ignored this story it's unlikely many would have heard of it. Sadly by calling it out so publicly he has probably unleashed a lot more press coverage around it and inadvertently increased the Spectator's sales.
I wish that were the case, but sadly there are only too many little England Daly Mail readers out there only too glad to read, hear and believe bad stuff about Rashford.
It's projection. People in that world whose primary motivation is money interpreting the actions of others using their own warped logic.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I tried reading that article but it's just fecking awful. Like reading the rambling thoughts of Grandpa Simpson.
Unfortunately, I don't want to read this. It's absolutely fecking insufferable.
It was a ruse, spoon fed to The Spectator by one person who made pretty much everything up.
They basically bullshitted to the Spectator and they fell for it. It's rather brilliant.
The author of that piece claims to be the source of the hit piece by anonymously trolling The Spectator who were looking for stories for a new section of the publication called "WokeyLeaks", the purpose of which was to "pull the rug from under the left".
Not difficult to imagine any of the tory papers (so, uh, basically any fecking paper in the country) believing and running a story that would have been pretty much "See! Saint Marcus is just as crooked as you or me!".Wow, yeah that sums up how utterly terrible "journalism" is these days. What a wind up and what a insight into the shite world of whatever the spectators call themselves and those who are no different to them.
I hope so too, it was painfully hard to read in between all the "lol'z" and "hahaaha"To be fair, of course they would.
Hopefully an actual story is written about it somewhere though rather than something that reads like a 14 year old's Tumblr blog.
Why? Because they're actually lying about who the Spectator contacted to get the story. How would you know that?!
Helluva scotch it must be.
