No10
Guest
Personly I am 100% behind the PFA.
I just heard Key Bates(h8 him) saying that the TV side are gonna take them to court to get an injunction, if they lose the injunction, Then the TV peeps will start to talk and prolly offer more money.
If however, they win. Then the TV people will give the PFA no money what so ever.
Could this mean the end for the PFA?
Also with the FA backing them, surely the games will just get put back a month, and if thats the case then the strike will not have done anything as the games will still be shown on TV. If the games do go ahead then does that mean teams would have to field only players who voted against the strike??
The chelsea Man Utd game could be like a knock about ina park if that happened.
I just heard Key Bates(h8 him) saying that the TV side are gonna take them to court to get an injunction, if they lose the injunction, Then the TV peeps will start to talk and prolly offer more money.
If however, they win. Then the TV people will give the PFA no money what so ever.
Could this mean the end for the PFA?
Also with the FA backing them, surely the games will just get put back a month, and if thats the case then the strike will not have done anything as the games will still be shown on TV. If the games do go ahead then does that mean teams would have to field only players who voted against the strike??
The chelsea Man Utd game could be like a knock about ina park if that happened.