You actually managed to be strangely racist in that post. If you watched the video, they argued that Ronaldo would beat him if he perfected his running technique, but as Ronaldo said, he was a footballer, not a sprinter, so agility was more important than flat out top speed. Ronaldo often beat Pique for speed, and faster players like Alba and Alves, but one bad step or a mistimed run and you lose.Ronaldo was never spectacularly fast. He was fast of course as you'd expect from a lean, not overly bulky 6 foot guy with below 8 %-ish body fat who trains his legs regularly as a pro footballer, but never in the top 10 fastest players or Ousmane Dembélé levels fast for example. Pique was more or less keeping up with him in his prime.
His marketing team is off the charts though. They took a completely average, white, Spanish 100 meter sprinter who usually clocks around 10.5-ish seconds on 100 meters, gave him a pair of zero grip tennis trainers, let him run against Ronaldo and marketed "only 0.3 seconds slower than a pro sprinter" on 25 meters as some sort of unbelievable achievement, even though 0.3 seconds on just 25 meters translates to at least 1.2 seconds over 100 meters. "At least", because Ronaldo won't actually gain speed over a pro sprinter over a longer distance, he will be even slower. So 10.5 + 1.2 = 11.7 s. That would be Ronaldo's 100 meter ball park, there or thereabouts. Maybe worse, given that the sprinter didn't win by 0.3 seconds at optimal conditions either.
That's ridiculously quick. I was watching the player in black to make some sprint, then out of nowhere like Roadrunner Traore won the ball.He’s stupidly quick.
I think it's because centre backs in particular are seen as untalented shithouses due to their limited skills on the ball and lack of flair compared to more attack-minded players. Someone like Ronaldo just has the look of a guy who is lightning quick without even seeing him run, especially compared to a guy like Ivanovic, but I'm not sure Ronaldo actually had a higher top speed in his prime. In reality defenders are tall and physically trained guys. I'd bet the best 100m time in most top football teams would be set by a CB.What I do find weird about these lists is that they are always comprised of attackers. After FIFA19 was released, Kyle Walked argued strongly that he was faster than Sane in a 100m race, and I think I would agree. You also often see fast forwards/wingers beaten in foot races by centre backs. Koulibaly beat Salah a couple of times on runs; Bailly beating Aubameyang, Varane beating Aubameyang, Smalling beating Aubameyang and Willian and so forth.
How is that racist?You actually managed to be strangely racist in that post. If you watched the video, they argued that Ronaldo would beat him if he perfected his running technique, but as Ronaldo said, he was a footballer, not a sprinter, so agility was more important than flat out top speed. Ronaldo often beat Pique for speed, and faster players like Alba and Alves, but one bad step or a mistimed run and you lose.
Ronaldo was one of the fastest top players around, but I doubt he was ever the fastest. Ferguson never mentioned Ronaldo when he talked about the fastest players he had at United; Gary Pallister (!), Rio, Kanchelskis and Giggs were mentioned.
They took an average, WHITE, sprinter... why bother saying he is white? That would be just as racist as saying you took an average intelligent, black, person to compare someone's IQ. Why mention colour at all if not for some prejudice regarding colour.How is that racist?
Now come on, stop seeing rqcism everywhere. It is simply the truth that some ethnicities are more likely to have certain physiques and this also includes that Black people typically are better sprinters than white people - there's statistic evidence for that and the topic has been scientifically researched. If I took a Norwegian of average height and compared him to the Spanish population, then argued that he is actually very huge and someone pointed out that this is no reasonable comparison, is that racism, too?They took an average, WHITE, sprinter... why bother saying he is white? That would be just as racist as saying you took an average intelligent, black, person to compare someone's IQ. Why mention colour at all if not for some prejudice regarding colour.
Ronaldo was crazy fast at his physical peakRonaldo was never spectacularly fast. He was fast of course as you'd expect from a lean, not overly bulky 6 foot guy with below 8 %-ish body fat who trains his legs regularly as a pro footballer, but never in the top 10 fastest players or Ousmane Dembélé levels fast for example. Pique was more or less keeping up with him in his prime.
His marketing team is off the charts though. They took a completely average, white, Spanish 100 meter sprinter who usually clocks around 10.5-ish seconds on 100 meters, gave him a pair of zero grip tennis trainers, let him run against Ronaldo and marketed "only 0.3 seconds slower than a pro sprinter" on 25 meters as some sort of unbelievable achievement, even though 0.3 seconds on just 25 meters translates to at least 1.2 seconds over 100 meters. "At least", because Ronaldo won't actually gain speed over a pro sprinter over a longer distance, he will be even slower. So 10.5 + 1.2 = 11.7 s. That would be Ronaldo's 100 meter ball park, there or thereabouts. Maybe worse, given that the sprinter didn't win by 0.3 seconds at optimal conditions either.
Not seeing racism anywhere, and it would have sufficed to say average sprinter, which would also be false. Blacks are typically better sprinters, no doubt. That being said, it was still one of Spain's fastest men and competing in the Olympics, so hardly a slouch. There is no point in pointing out his colour. He was still rapid by any yardstick, and I doubt any footballer in the world would be able to beat him in a footrace. BTW, the Spanish sprinter's best time is actually 10,23 - not that many, black or white, can boast a better time than that!Now come on, stop seeing rqcism everywhere. It is simply the truth that some ethnicities are more likely to have certain physiques and this also includes that Black people typically are better sprinters than white people - there's statistic evidence for that and the topic has been scientifically researched. If I took a Norwegian of average height and compared him to the Spanish population, then argued that he is actually very huge and someone pointed out that this is no reasonable comparison, is that racism, too?
Sterling for top speed? Nah. He's too short, and I've seen him outpaced on longer runs a few times.The source of info should be posted otherwise anyone can put players like matic.I thought it would include raheem sterling though.
You mean where Adama Traore had to run around VVD? Lindelöf would have beat Traore in that foot race. But I agree that VVD is fast, but not Varane or Bailly fast. Gomez is also fast, and quicker off the mark than VVD, but again not Varane or Bailly fast, as we're talking centre backs. Overall though, Liverpool probably has one of the quickest squads around.Joe Gomez is ridiculously fast, should be up there. Made up about 15 yards on Willian in the Chelsea Match. VVD also Matched Adama Traore for pace at Wolves before Christmas; without breaking a sweat. "When I saw the defender match Wolves' lightning-quick Adama Traore for pace, my jaw dropped." Garth Crooks
I think it’s a comment that wants to be offended, I mean is he white Irish, white Indian or what? It’s not a racist comment there was no hate or anything. There are more colours than black or white.They took an average, WHITE, sprinter... why bother saying he is white? That would be just as racist as saying you took an average intelligent, black, person to compare someone's IQ. Why mention colour at all if not for some prejudice regarding colour.
That's ridiculous.He’s stupidly quick.
Sorry, just checked my alerts and saw this. The players you listed are the next bracket down. I don't know how these things are even measured, to be honest with you, nor when, if it's a set process.@Fortitude does seem a weird table when Sane, Van anholt, Vardy and Martial have the fastest recorded speeds in the premiership and Sane is 10th on this list?
They could be using an Auba or Traore stat from some other league I guess.
Weirdly after this thread fastest footballer 2018/19 videos started popping up all over my YouTube feed and some were similar to your list you provided and others pointed to Bellerin as being the fastest but then I realised top speed might not be what they are using and instead distance covered as the Bellerin one was something about how quickly he did 40m and he very well might cover 40m quicker than Sane can.Sorry, just checked my alerts and saw this. The players you listed are the next bracket down. I don't know how these things are even measured, to be honest with you, nor when, if it's a set process.
You'd think it's pre-season recorded times, but who knows? Could possibly be in game clocking, also. Like I said, I had no idea at all about Traore, but then seeing him in flight, he's astonishingly fast - looks more like a sprinter than a footballer, in stride, even.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-47245967/seven-year-old-blaze-may-be-the-fastest-in-the-worldMore videos of these fast players would be helpful
He’s stupidly quick.
I was gonna post exactly the bold bit by @SadlerMUFCThat was ridiculously quick. At first I thought I was supposed to be watching the guy in the black on the right wing and then bam...didn't even look like he was trying
He tried against Bailly and was outpaced. Similar story against Varane.It's been a while since we've seen Aubameyang running at full sprint.
Pretty sure it lead to a penalty.Video cuts before the inevitable
stop, pause and pass infield to Carrick 15 feet back.
Wtf? Is that even real