He might not win another election, but I doubt he will impeached over anything other than proof of treason or something similar. Definitely not for acting like a moronic turd.
The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
- Status
My point is that a large amount comes from the USSR, the Russian army is divided between high tech material and extremely outdated ones.
That's true but the fact that they are older generation does not necessarily mean they won't have their supporting role . Plus they are far easier to maintain due to being low tech, and as I said quantity makes up for quality.
Yep. 33 billion more has been contributed in the last few years compared to previous periods.
Not sure. It's the same claim he made at the summit before then being contradicted by several other NATO leaders who said that they had merely reconfirmed their ambitions to meet NATO's 2% targets.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-germany-angela-merkel-evidence-a8444396.html
I don't see how this can be true and yet the meeting with Russia being great. If it weren't for ulterior motives you'd think that if it would ve been any other POTUS, Russia would have canceled the summit out of protest. They hate NATO after all.
Than the answer would be "no" surely?
Its true that an extra 33 billion has been contributed
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...hecking-president-trumps-nato-summit-news-co/
Just an example, last year France planned to spend 300 billions in the next 7 years. In Trump's mind that money is for NATO.
It's not even about the content of the media they listed, if one of the higher ranking guys at a station/paper/parent company once was a member, signed an open letter (in 2003) or gave a speech (or attended as a guest) at a meeting of one of the three organizations that "means" their reporting is controlled by the US.Arte isn't really pro american, do you guys have a different version?
It's anonymous "research" without any documentation, probably straight out of Moscow.
Last edited:
But it appears that the agreement for this increase occurred before his presidency, so his assertion that it is solely thanks to him (or even in part thanks to him) is false, as usual.
Its to be expected that he'll take credit for everything.
From what I can gather the incremental increases in military spending were decided upon in 2014 with NATO members agreeing to meet the 2% spending threshold by 2024. The "33 billion" Trump mentions as well as future increases in expenditure seems to reflect a renewed adherence to these 2014 pledges.
If Americans wanted increased military spending from allies it's "thanks Obama" (I guess).
Last edited:
"Swiss Propaganda Research"Which is correct economically. If the EU emancipated itself from the Dollar System and became allies with Russia and its ressources and thus made NATO obsolete and on top of that intensified economic relations with China the US would end as a world power. Unfortunately the US has planted their transatlantic bots all over Europe so our mainstream media are all singing the same (American) tune and acting against their self-interest.
mmm hmm
If everyone wanted increased military spending it's thanks to everyone.
Gotcha, thanks. So were the KKK anti-Vietnam war or is this a more recent alignment?
Its more of a post cold war phenomenon, since the conservative movement was staunchly communist pre-early 90s.
Ha, yeah, fair enough. Was only including Americans in everyone.
'Only because of me'. What a man(go).
What a man(go).Anyone watching the Obama speech? Its clear he's going after Trump with what he's saying.
In short no. There is a longer answer that reaches to yes but eventually no.
Wait, is he saying NATO have paid more to... NATO?
"Only because of me". Cnut!
Yeah I've spent some more time surfing their website. It's pure bs and no science or research involved. @Cait Sith Where did you come across this, or were you involved in creating it?
Thing is, when you combine the comments of those who said after he met with them that NATO can no longer rely on the US, then it makes sense that they would want to spend more in their own defense!'Only because of me'.
So it actually is because of him, but only because he is such an abject twat that countries can’t rely on the US.
The desperation for damage control is palpable.Which is correct economically. If the EU emancipated itself from the Dollar System and became allies with Russia and its ressources and thus made NATO obsolete and on top of that intensified economic relations with China the US would end as a world power. Unfortunately the US has planted their transatlantic bots all over Europe so our mainstream media are all singing the same (American) tune and acting against their self-interest.
Yeah it's true because it was previously agreed by Obama as far as I'm aware. Trump had nothing to do with it at all.
Deleted. Did he spell something wrong?
After all this masterful stuff with his NATO allies, I'll bet his creditors wish he'd have a word with himself.
no he didnt as far as i can tell
"Thank you @RandPaul, you really get it!" Trump tweeted, citing a comment by the Kentucky senator that "the President has gone through a year and a half of totally partisan investigations - what’s he supposed think?”
"This deal is terrible. The worst. Thank God I'm here now. It's an awful deal!"
"You negotiated the deal, Mr President."
"This deal is great! Where's my cup-holder?"
NUNES: "Here I am, sir."
"You negotiated the deal, Mr President."
"This deal is great! Where's my cup-holder?"
NUNES: "Here I am, sir."
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Perhaps I'm thinking too much in terms of 4d chess here but it d be easy for NATO or one of its members to call bluff on Trump now and say as much as it's not because of him-that it was simply a re commitment to something Obama pushed hard during his time in office.
Then Trumpie will of course get pissy and start attacking NATO again to the delight of his handlers. It's hard not to constantly think about the possible man behind the curtain these days.
Then Trumpie will of course get pissy and start attacking NATO again to the delight of his handlers. It's hard not to constantly think about the possible man behind the curtain these days.
I love that guy
- Status