The irony is that, under Obamacare, with subsidies going to for-profit pvt companies, you were actively and surely spending more on health than is necessary. That is literally true whenever any insurance company makes a profit: people have spent more on healthcare than would be necessary.
Why does no one ever confront these people when they say they can't remember? How the feck can you be fit to make government policy when you can't remember what happened a couple of months ago, or in
FECK YOU!
Considering the size and scope of your country I always thought the $1T figure was a proper low ball.
Showed this to some folks today. An actual response...
He was referring to the journalists reporting it
I despair at your country when I hear shite like that. it must be so frustrating for progressives where you're from.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Right, I'm out.
Yep. Frustrating is pretty accurate
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
If you extend your logic everything should be state owned, and have no profits. Which would be fine if state run enterprises managed equal levels of efficiency and innovation as private ones. So you're not wrong in your definition, but there is going to be some level of profit if a healthcare system will have any private element, and highlighting whatever that number is in $ also isn't sufficient because it's going to be a big absolute number. Returns on capital and returns on equity vs other sectors is what would have to be benchmarked.
He was on the BBC earlier and said we will have to wait and see .
@ who disHas there ever been a not for profit health insurance company? Kind of like a building society in the UK, where all profits are supposedly distributed to the members, ie savers, borrowers, I'm not sure if a credit union is the same over there.
Well, you got me, I'm a commie
Did you type a reverse of tad?
edit :why is that censored
How reliable is 'the smoking gun'? If true this is absolutely huge news.
nah typed oh " dee eye ess"
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Done a bit of digging and can say they look to be legit and reliable. They mainly post stuff such as legal documents, arrest records, and police mugshots.
Jail hopefully.
I'm sure you tried to type d-a-t, that's Ebonics blaaad!
edit :why is that censored
I haven't. but d *s and d*t are actual Jamaican words. I'm offended that my language is censored
Since ISIS is largely on the back-foot already, he'll likely claim credit for their defeat if it does come during his time in office. Similarly, an economic upturn, or him generally not being as dangerous as expected by doing something like not annihilating the entirety of mankind, will likely make people perceive some of the attacks on him as having been over the top. It wouldn't surprise me if he manages to sneak through again...presuming he doesn't get impeached.
It's a very real possibility.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Think langy was chuckling at the lack of congruence between the two visions of the future
Yes but that dis-regards words like dis-regard.
Think langy was chuckling at the lack of congruence between the two visions of the future
In fairness I can easily see either happening, the lack of predictability is the scariest thing.
