Stadjer
Full Member
The reason i wanted Italy to win was because of the Southgate tactics. Criminal to play with these players and tactics while he has fantastic players mostly unused on the bench
Are you related to the Southgates?First decent side they came up against and bottled it.
Not southgates fault.
Throwing rashford and sancho into the penalty shootout without either of them touching the ball was a bad call.They played well in the first half. The Italians sharpened up and a better manager would have been proactive to change things before conceding. From then on every call he made damaged the team and he had 2 penalty takers who hadn't touched the ball.
Appalling management.
England beat them so they're rubbish.Germany wasn't decent?
I'm not english, but he was too defensive today.Wow the first manager to get England to a major final in 50 plus years and you’re calling for his head you spoilt bastards.
His formation was fine and he changed it, Italy are just a good team.
It went to penalties, two of the best teams on penalties in the final.
At the start of the tournament if someone said to me I’ll give you penalties in the final every single one of us snaps their hand off it’s just a shame the Man Utd boys let us down.
More to come.
Wow, maybe give it a few days you drama queen.He was too defensive today.
Even Deschamps wanted to win 2016 final, as he tried to attack, and actually he should have won before E.T, Portugal just lucked out with that hit on post at the last minute.
In no way Gareth should have a new contract, he won't play better than this.
I couldn't agree more. England has a golden generation of offensive talent and he plays the team like Middlesbrough.From the 15th minute, he instructed his team to play on the back foot. From the moment Italy scored Southgate set up his team to take them to pens... against an absolute mammoth in goal.
Italy looked terrified at the beginning of the game. England has the best attacking options in the world, and he decided to nullify that at every opportunity. This is all entirely on Southgate. He's got away from it from the off. The quality of the team has mitigated Southgate's negativeness.
He has to go.
Yup.From a Scot who watched my team go toe to toe with this immensely talented England team.
This loss in a Final is the worst case scenario for England. Southgate will be praised , keep his job , and waste the all the potential your attacking talents possess.
We didn't even go for it then! Rashford was ready to come on, then he waited another 14 fecking minutes! Rashford and Sancho on in the 119th minute, Sterling left on but didn't take a penalty...Everyone knows sitting on a 1 goal lead doesn't work - especially against Italy who are quality and clever.
Southgate's negativity bit him in the ass. Grealish has to come on at 60 mins. A ball holder and someone who can create. These were tactics of a championship side that snatched an early lead.
Thing is - England is better than Italy. At some point you have to go for it. But not in the 105 minute.
Guys, hell has frozen over with a sensible post from rimaldo. We are all doomed.that was so obviously on southgate that anyone who watches that and decides differently knows as much about football as gareth southgate does.
yep. just yep.We didn't even go for it then! Rashford was ready to come on, then he waited another 14 fecking minutes! Rashford and Sancho on in the 119th minute, Sterling left on but didn't take a penalty...
Seriously, anyone defending this clown surely can't have watched that game and grasped what actually went on.
Yeah, sadly agree. Seems a lovely bloke but from the Mourinho school of over-complicating tactics.As a Welshman, now that you're winning nowt I couldn't be more made up that you got so far - that massive chancer will probably be given another two more tournaments minimum, and you'll never have as much luck with tournament structure and draws ever again.
Guys, hell has frozen over with a sensible post from rimaldo. We are all doomed.
/thread
/caf
/world
With Phillips and Rice in midfield? Seems unlikely. He definitely was slow to react and bringing Sancho and Rashford on so late didn't help them but England's midfield is 2nd rate and just like at the World Cup the moment they played one of the best teams they got outplayed.Held back by their manager, switch them and England wins this 5-0.
Germany lost to Macedonia before the tournament and 6-0 to Spain not long ago either. They are the worst Germany side in recent memoryGermany wasn't decent?
Yes to all of this. Amd I'm not English so you should all accept my opinion as non-biased expert facts.Of course it's his fault. Sancho has over 150 goals and assists at the age of 21, and he brought on Saka with 6 goals in his entire career. He has a team dripping with attacking talent, and he played passively the entire tournament. When Italy scored he made two defensive subs, and he literally held off as long as he could to bring on Rashford and Sancho on. It's beyond contestation that he played for pens. If he plays for pens against the best penalty saver in the tournament, and expects 3 kids, 2 of which played scarcely a minute all game to win us the shootout, then that is all on Southgate. I'm sorry but you've got to be clinically blind think this is on the players.
Who the feck do you support you dosserFirst decent side they came up against and bottled it.
Not southgates fault.
Err no, Mancini wouldn’t have a Rice-Philips midfield pairing to begin with. England has enough talent to dominate in midfield but Southgate is too much of a coward to play them because his approach is defense first.With Phillips and Rice in midfield? Seems unlikely. He definitely was slow to react and bringing Sancho and Rashford on so late didn't help them but England's midfield is 2nd rate and just like at the World Cup the moment they played one of the best teams they got outplayed.
Falling on the easier side of the draw has flattered them in both tournaments, they have great attacking options and fine full backs but until they have a more commanding centre back pairing and a midfield that is more capable of keeping the ball against good sides it's going to be a struggle to win something.
Who would play then? England don't have a single midfielder who is anywhere near close to the quality of all 3 that started for Italy today.Err no, Mancini wouldn’t have a Rice-Philips midfield pairing to begin with. England has enough talent to dominate in midfield but Southgate is too much of a coward to play them because his approach is defense first.
To be fair, when you look at their team, it is not great. Their defence and forwards are pretty poor. They only really have a midfield with old-man Kroos.Germany was not a decent side?
What I find weird is why do people forget Bellingham? Even the pundits never mention him.Err no, Mancini wouldn’t have a Rice-Philips midfield pairing to begin with. England has enough talent to dominate in midfield but Southgate is too much of a coward to play them because his approach is defense first.
Grealish and Foden can both play in central midfield. Them two ahead of a Rice in a three, with Grealish helping Shaw and Sterling overload the left channel, and Foden helping Walker and Sancho/Saka overload the right, would make for a fine midfield.Who would play then? England don't have a single midfielder who is anywhere near close to the quality of all 3 that started for Italy today.