Television Tho Prop Grops Throps

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,256
Location
Canada
More 24/7 fun...



More entertaining than anything else on the main roster, by a large distance.
The best thing happening in WWE right now. R-Truth is a comedy gold, who deserves all the applause. I know it would seem impossible to happen but just for comedy purpose can we have Rock win it for a moment and have some bizarre character pin him just for his reaction.
 

paulscholes18

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
20,278
Rollins vs Corbin starting and heard that Ziggler V Kofi is the main event. Guess Brock to cash in on Kingston
 

Shane88

Actually Nostradamus
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
35,488
Location
Targaryen loyalist
Imagine being a lapsed fan and looking at Rollins. Supposedly the top guy or one of them and he is also supposedly a good guy and the only way he can get the better of Lesnar is kicking him in the balls. What a dork.
 

Renegade

Full Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
5,393
They’re really building Shane up bizarrely. HHH & his OTT self important entrances are so boring. Right after seeing the clip of that self important creator blah blah documentary. He really does think of himself as the best doesn’t he?
 

Renegade

Full Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
5,393
In a way, it's reminiscent of Ric Flair building himself up as the top dog when he was running WCW from 1999 onwards.
I don’t recall, don’t think I was watching WCW that year. I struggle to believe that it’s similar to this Shane situation as Ric is at least a good promo and a former multi time champion. He has credibility at the very least.
 

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,198
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
I hope you’re right. Kofi is the worst champion since Jinder. And I actually think Jinder was slightly better
You've literally not been a fan of him from day dot, you're bias af. So bias that you claimed he was an insult to previous WWE Champions and try to rewrite history claiming Vince McMahon had never won the WWE Championship.

The fact that you think he's a worse champ than Jinder fecking Mahal who literally was not, and has never been over says a lot about your opinion.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,859
Location
Salford
I'm not a massive fan of champion Kofi, but man, what did Kofi do to hurt you?
I don’t get it at all. Think WWE/F champions and I think of Rock, Austin, Hogan, Bret Hart, HBK, Eddie, Lesnar. Not some guy who dresses like a unicorn and throws pancakes at peoples heads.

You've literally not been a fan of him from day dot, you're bias af. So bias that you claimed he was an insult to previous WWE Champions and try to rewrite history claiming Vince McMahon had never won the WWE Championship.

The fact that you think he's a worse champ than Jinder fecking Mahal who literally was not, and has never been over says a lot about your opinion.
Jinder sucked but he served his purpose.

I was wrong about Vince not winning the title, he has. I’d still say he’s a more realistic Champion than Kofi and at least he had the decency to drop it to someone more worthy
 

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,198
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
I don’t get it at all. Think WWE/F champions and I think of Rock, Austin, Hogan, Bret Hart, HBK, Eddie, Lesnar. Not some guy who dresses like a unicorn and throws pancakes at peoples heads.



Jinder sucked but he served his purpose.

I was wrong about Vince not winning the title, he has. I’d still say he’s a more realistic Champion than Kofi and at least he had the decency to drop it to someone more worthy
He vacated the title. You trying to tell me vacant is a more worthy champion than Kofi? A title that Jinder, sheamus, Vince, Miz (well before he was decent), mankind etc have all won, Kofis the joke. Hmmm.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,859
Location
Salford
He vacated the title. You trying to tell me vacant is a more worthy champion than Kofi? A title that Jinder, sheamus, Vince, Miz (well before he was decent), mankind etc have all won, Kofis the joke. Hmmm.
Mankind winning the title shifted the power in the Monday night wars. And therefore changed the landscape of professional wrestling at the peak of its popularity.

Unsurprisingly, Kofi wins the title and people are switching the product off more than any point in recent history. It was a nice idea and all, this grafter who has been around forever winning the biggest prize. An underdog story. But they did it with the wrong guy. It worked when Eddie Guerrero did it. That was special. Kofis moment will never be in that league. He’ll lose it eventually and it’ll go down in the history books as a failed experiment.
 

Alex99

Rehab's Pete Doherty
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
16,225
I don’t get it at all. Think WWE/F champions and I think of Rock, Austin, Hogan, Bret Hart, HBK, Eddie, Lesnar. Not some guy who dresses like a unicorn and throws pancakes at peoples heads.



Jinder sucked but he served his purpose.

I was wrong about Vince not winning the title, he has. I’d still say he’s a more realistic Champion than Kofi and at least he had the decency to drop it to someone more worthy
The Rock was a goofy bastard, HBK was regularly a goofy bastard, even Austin spent a good chunk of his time as a different kind of goofy bastard. Kofi's been presented as a far more serious character in the build up to, and since winning the title. Hogan was shite, and almost all wrestling from his era on top was shite.

Jinder was actually a failed experiment, but in another post you're calling Kofi a failed experiment. You seem really bitter about it for no reason.

I'm not a massive fan of the "give it to the veteran" thing, but it's actually not been a bad run. He'll drop it soon, sure, but they're certainly not trying to make him the next face of the company, and it's certainly been a less boring reign than the abomination that was Jinder's poorly booked mess.

I just don't get this bollocks about "realistic" champions. Like, you're watching wrestling. If you want realism watch MMA.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,859
Location
Salford
The Rock was a goofy bastard, HBK was regularly a goofy bastard, even Austin spent a good chunk of his time as a different kind of goofy bastard. Kofi's been presented as a far more serious character in the build up to, and since winning the title. Hogan was shite, and almost all wrestling from his era on top was shite.

Jinder was actually a failed experiment, but in another post you're calling Kofi a failed experiment. You seem really bitter about it for no reason.

I'm not a massive fan of the "give it to the veteran" thing, but it's actually not been a bad run. He'll drop it soon, sure, but they're certainly not trying to make him the next face of the company, and it's certainly been a less boring reign than the abomination that was Jinder's poorly booked mess.

I just don't get this bollocks about "realistic" champions. Like, you're watching wrestling. If you want realism watch MMA.
Goofy bastards who drew money and interest. Kofi does neither.

I don’t mean realistic as in who would win real fights. But realistic as in who should be fronting the company. Daniel Bryan would get killed if it was real, but he’s the best thing in WWE by a landslide and a very realistic worthy top class Champion
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
37,535
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
I don’t recall, don’t think I was watching WCW that year. I struggle to believe that it’s similar to this Shane situation as Ric is at least a good promo and a former multi time champion. He has credibility at the very least.
He did, but he wasn't necessarily pushing himself to the top. He was abusing his power to have things be done his way (similar to Shane giving Elias and Drew favours). There was a time when he was pushing his son for the WCW title even though his son wasn't even a decent wrestler. They had good wrestlers like Booker T who were ready for the title, but they were all put aside for Ric's son.
 

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,198
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
Mankind winning the title shifted the power in the Monday night wars. And therefore changed the landscape of professional wrestling at the peak of its popularity.

Unsurprisingly, Kofi wins the title and people are switching the product off more than any point in recent history. It was a nice idea and all, this grafter who has been around forever winning the biggest prize. An underdog story. But they did it with the wrong guy. It worked when Eddie Guerrero did it. That was special. Kofis moment will never be in that league. He’ll lose it eventually and it’ll go down in the history books as a failed experiment.
Yep, Kofi is the reason people are unhappy with the product :lol:

Did he refuse to sign your autograph or something?
 

Mystry

Friendship is magic
Joined
Apr 24, 2010
Messages
15,837
Location
You're...going to love me
In a way, it's reminiscent of Ric Flair building himself up as the top dog when he was running WCW from 1999 onwards.
Flair never ran WCW in 99. In fact Flair had various periods of being outright buried by numerous bookers from about 91 despite being one of their most over guys and one of their best workers.
 

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,198
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
Goofy bastards who drew money and interest. Kofi does neither.

I don’t mean realistic as in who would win real fights. But realistic as in who should be fronting the company. Daniel Bryan would get killed if it was real, but he’s the best thing in WWE by a landslide and a very realistic worthy top class Champion
New day is one of the biggest merch sellers and kofimania was created by fans :lol:

At this point I reckon you're on a wum.
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
37,535
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
Flair never ran WCW in 99. In fact Flair had various periods of being outright buried by numerous bookers from about 91 despite being one of their most over guys and one of their best workers.
He never formally ran it, but he was billed as the president in their live events for several months. Before that, yeah, he was perfectly fine.
 

Charlie Foley

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
18,599
Goofy bastards who drew money and interest. Kofi does neither.

I don’t mean realistic as in who would win real fights. But realistic as in who should be fronting the company. Daniel Bryan would get killed if it was real, but he’s the best thing in WWE by a landslide and a very realistic worthy top class Champion
I have absolutely no idea what you mean by “realistic.” I don’t think you know what that word means
 

Patrick08

New Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2018
Messages
5,447
Goodness me I have to wait for 50 men to be thrown over ropes to see the main event.