Spurs
Eriksen
Son
Kane
Spurs dip has coincided with Eriksen not giving a shit, wasn't sure about putting Kane in at all as at times they seemed better without him last season
This is pretty outdated. Eriksen has been bloody awful for some time now, and he hasn't been
great for Denmark either.
The Kane thing is just a complete myth. If you do the relevant statistical tests, not only is it not true that Spurs performed better without Kane, there's not even a good enough sample from each condition to draw statistically significant inferences anyway.
If you want to try to create inferences based on limited data, the run at the end of the season was their longest consecutive run without Kane. To wit, they played about 8 games, won 1(!) of them and scored a grand total of 3 goals(!!). I had thought that period would've put the meme of Spurs being better without Kane to bed but I think the collectively abysmal CL final made everyone forget again.
Anyway, taking a broader view of Spurs under Poch's entire reign, it's Kane #1 and not even close. He has scored almost as many goals in that time as every other current player in the team put together. At no point was it ever
not Kane, unless you start looking at individual games -- there's some ambiguity around granularity inherent in the question.