Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
More of both!More of the Felix less of the Weghorst rumours!
Yeah I mean I guess I could live with that. Can't be wrong to have a big lump for squeeky bum time.More of both!
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Sounds like the type of deal we'd be looking for. He was atrocious at Burnley but at least he seems to have gotten back to scoring form in Turkey. Think he'd only be a backup for us and Martial probably remains 1st choice. Expect we will see this move relatively quickly if there's anything to it.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This can still break down if Besiktas decide that they don't want to let go of Weghorst. However, the player giving the green light makes it difficult for Besiktas to stop Weghorst.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Memphis, Weghorst and Felix (Triple Loan with Felix Obligation to buy) anyone?How about Memphis?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Would give us options but cannot see three loan deals in one window,mind you Spurs did a couple this time last year.Memphis, Weghorst and Felix (Triple Loan with Felix Obligation to buy) anyone?
Romano jumping on after someone else as usual.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Your expectations are too high for January and no budgetProblem is this does not solve the issue of needing someone better than martial who is back to his usual goal shy self.
Yeah preciselyYour expectations are too high for January and no budget
I'll see if I can find the tweet but it lines up with the fact that apparently the owners want to give EtH the ability to have attacking options at his disposal this January.Would give us options but cannot see three loan deals in one window,mind you Spurs did a couple this time last year.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Ogden is tier 4 now?Thanks to @UnitedSofa in the João Félix thread:
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Source (Tier 2 - Dawson, Tier 4 - Ogden): https://www.espn.com/soccer/soccer-...ed-loan-for-netherlands-striker-wout-weghorst
Personally be happy with Weghorst and Felix. Would be a cracking reinforcement for the squad.Memphis, Weghorst and Felix (Triple Loan with Felix Obligation to buy) anyone?
He has been for a while. He's not been reliable for several years.Ogden is tier 4 now?
Yeah someone who gives us a different dimension up front and a creative player capable of playing in multiple positionsPersonally be happy with Weghorst and Felix. Would be a cracking reinforcement for the squad.
Exactly. If we add them both the Europa League is ours to lose.Yeah someone who gives us a different dimension up front and a creative player capable of playing in multiple positions
Anyone suggesting that Morata or Felix would be a low cost deal shouldn't be taken seriously.Ogden is tier 4 now?
The initial loan fee (what we want to pay at least) is a low cost deal.Anyone suggesting that Morata or Felix would be a low cost deal shouldn't be taken seriously.
Why are people talking about us getting more than one in, if what we are reading is right then it will be one and for cheap.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This doesn't necessarily indicate more than one signing (i.e. this may have been translated without context), and on top of that, this is the journalists' conjectures rather than anything conclusive.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Yeah that is very trueThis doesn't necessarily indicate more than one signing (i.e. this may have been translated without context), and on top of that, this is the journalists' conjectures rather than anything conclusive.
Perhaps we should see if we can go double Dutch and get Depay then
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
What a fecking parody of contradictions these tweets are.Thanks to @UnitedSofa in the João Félix thread:
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Source (Tier 2 - Dawson, Tier 4 - Ogden):
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
EDIT: Replaced link with Tweet to the same article
Our wage structure is a running joke which ETH and Richard Arnold are desperately now trying to rectify.Regardless of who is to blame. With your reasoning - we are asking our best goalkeeper who has over the last 7-8 years been our best or at least close to our best performer to take an insane paycut - not because we have to because of finances, not because he is overpaid in terms the wages we have at our club, but because you think its his market value. If we give DeGea £150.000 a week - we would demote him from one of our best performers, to one of the least paid first-team regulars. The only way to do something like this (if you have a TINY understanding of human behaviour) - is if you want to chase DDG out the door. Because that is what will happen - no sane person will accept a 60% paycut - unless maybe to save the club from bankrupcty as a gesture of goodwill.
But what you don't seem to grasp - is that if there are just 2 clubs with money competing for a 32 year DDG, "the market value" thing doesn't really count. Simply because since there is no transfer fee involved, clubs can afford to offer him a bit more to win a bidding war. But maybe you are right, maybe they will only offer him say £180.000 and a 4-year contract- of course they will likely sweeten that deal by a huge signing on fee. Let's for sake of argument that amount is £15 million - which isn't unlikely. Then that will be the equivalent to £75-80.000 extra a week over his contract period - so that renders your "market value"-theory rather void. Players who sign on free transfer don't get market value in their contracts. When Sol Campbell joined Arsenal from Spurs, the latter refused to give him £100.000 a week. Arsenal reportedly give him that and roughly £8-10 million in signing-on-fee. Which over his 5 year contract added another £30-40.000 a week.
You also make it sound impossible that anyone would give him above market value - market value is what anyone is willing to pay for him, not what similar goalkeepers get paid. The fact is - in Spain, there is a club DDG knows really well. Jan Oblak is their best paid player - almost on the same wages as DDG. Let's theoretically say that Oblak hands in a transfer request - Atletico sell him for £70 million and are short one goalkeeper. And they get DDG back for £15 million in signing on fee, and give him £300.000 a week - still £50.000 less than Oblak reportedly has. So when you say "it's really that simple" - you really over-simplify that. It's never that simple.
We gave him a contract of that amount a few years ago (which was too much granted) - I am sure we can get him to accept a slightly lower wage in his new contract- but your reasoning of an insane wage-reduction is only valid if your idea is to allow DDG to leave on a free. Because that is what will happen, and then we have to spend £50 million to replace him with a goalkeeper who may or not be just as good.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
We seem to be specifically looking at big men, Memphis doesn’t meet that briefHow about Memphis?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Dubravka has left?The maximum loans in one season is 4 - and Dubravka and Butland take up 2. So limit now would be 2 more loans. I'll be happy if we get 2 more options, but suspect it'll only be 1.