Sparky Rhiwabon
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2013
- Messages
- 16,946
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I don't think Garner is the solution for our midfield from what I've seen of him. But to sell him before Fred is crazy. Fred ( and McT for that matter) have conclusively proven they can't make it here. Why not sell one of them before selling Garner?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
We’d struggle to sell them for any money due to their wages compared to their ability. It would be a loan with us subsidising their wages at bestI don't think Garner is the solution for our midfield from what I've seen of him. But to sell him before Fred is crazy. Fred ( and McT for that matter) have conclusively proven they can't make it here. Why not sell one of them before selling Garner?
Ye we should most definitely sell McTominay before anyone else.I don't think Garner is the solution for our midfield from what I've seen of him. But to sell him before Fred is crazy. Fred ( and McT for that matter) have conclusively proven they can't make it here. Why not sell one of them before selling Garner?
Finally. Not that I think he isn’t a good player but we would normally hold onto him until he’s 25 and sell him for nothing to Watford or somebody.
Who would want them?I don't think Garner is the solution for our midfield from what I've seen of him. But to sell him before Fred is crazy. Fred ( and McT for that matter) have conclusively proven they can't make it here. Why not sell one of them before selling Garner?
Right decision. He needs first team football
We’d struggle to sell them for any money due to their wages compared to their ability. It would be a loan with us subsidising their wages at best
Surely some Italian, French or Spanish team will buy Fred for 5-10 million. He's a Brazilian international. Though yeah we'll probably need to subsidize his wages, but given he's only got a year left on his contract, I'd do it.Who would want them?
Who then moan asking why we didn’t sign a winger after spending 160m quid. We need funds. Even without midfielders he’s 5th choice. 20m with a buy back makes perfect sense.Selling him with a buyback clause really isn't an issue. But we'll be ridiculed for it by idiots in our fanbase because a lot enjoy us being 'banter FC'
Yep, exactly. Some people just like to moanWho then moan asking why we didn’t sign a winger after spending 160m quid. We need funds. Even without midfielders he’s 5th choice. 20m with a buy back makes perfect sense.
I think some people were hoping he would break into the first team this season is where the frustration comes from.Yep, exactly. Some people just like to moan
Sorry but why is he being sold instead of mctominay?
Personally, I think that was more in hope than expectation. And the hope came from being tired of McFred.I think some people were hoping he would break into the first team this season is where the frustration comes from.
If Ten Hag is happy to sell then obviously Garner isn't rated particularly highly.I think some people were hoping he would break into the first team this season is where the frustration comes from.
Oh good we are going to sell are only ball playing no 6 in the squad, genius not that we need one or anything.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Can't draw either.If Ten Hag is happy to sell then obviously Garner isn't rated particularly highly.
We see loads of moaning about why players like Chong, Peirera etc are/were hanging around the club for so long, whilst Liverpool and Chelsea sell some nobodies we've never heard of for £15m. But then as soon as we're open to selling our own version of that (most other fans won't have a clue who Garner is) there is moaning about not giving them a proper chance first.
Can't win really
Because to sell a player you need a club that wants to sell and a club that wants to buy.Sorry but why is he being sold instead of mctominay?
1. Nobody would have him.Sorry but why is he being sold instead of mctominay?
No, but we're not in a financial position to buy unless we sell. Have to sell players that someone might actually want.Are we really in a position to be selling midfielders right now?
Clearly trying to raise funds.Keep fred and Mctominay and sell Garner.. what a joke.
Garner has a good reputation from his loan stint last season, while the McFred duo are a known entity for being shit midfielders, so they aren't good assets to sell, unlike Garner.I don't think Garner is the solution for our midfield from what I've seen of him. But to sell him before Fred is crazy. Fred ( and McT for that matter) have conclusively proven they can't make it here. Why not sell one of them before selling Garner?
That makes no sense. Garner has yet to be given a chance, Periera and Chong have had too many. It's not rocket science to figure out which is the sensible solution between those two paths.If Ten Hag is happy to sell then obviously Garner isn't rated particularly highly.
We see loads of moaning about why players like Chong, Peirera etc are/were hanging around the club for so long, whilst Liverpool and Chelsea sell some nobodies we've never heard of for £15m. But then as soon as we're open to selling our own version of that (most other fans won't have a clue who Garner is) there is moaning about not giving them a proper chance first.
Can't win really
That is the kind of stuff that makes you want to punch a *insert something cute here*. Selling the kid before he has even played one game for us, are you joking?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The same applies for people saying why aren’t we selling Fred and Mctominay .Can people stop inventing random nonsense and accusing people of moaning about it.
What’s Mctominay’s nationality got to do with anything?That is the kind of stuff that makes you want to punch a *insert something cute here*. Selling the kid before he has even played one game for us, are you joking?
Sell the Scottish fraud that is McTominay first.
Exactly. This is why Smalling was first out of the door, not because he was the worst of the bunch, the opposite, teams saw him as worth buying.The same applies for people saying why aren’t we selling Fred and Mctominay .
You can’t sell players without buyers. Obviously there’s been interest in Garner.
That's what City do and they make a lot of money out of it.That is the kind of stuff that makes you want to punch a *insert something cute here*. Selling the kid before he has even played one game for us, are you joking?
Sell the Scottish fraud that is McTominay first.
He’ll have already been analysed to the highest degree by Ten Hag. Being given a chance is nonsense anyway, it’s not like players suddenly transform if they’re given a start. It’s not 2001 anymore when a manager could tell a player to go out and express themselves and then see what happens. The days of performing better in match days over training is over. You don’t need to flop in an EPL game for the manager to work out who you areThat makes no sense. Garner has yet to be given a chance, Periera and Chong have had too many. It's not rocket science to figure out which is the sensible solution between those two paths.
Can people stop inventing random nonsense and accusing people of moaning about it.
Clearly trying to raise funds.
Nobody would take Fred or Mctominay off us.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date