Man Spurs really wanted him out that bad.
Transfer Tweets - Manchester United - 2023/24
- Thread starter mazhar13
- Start date
Martial? It is more like who will be Martial's back up.
Who?
Chelsea must be kicking themselves for over asking for cucurella, they'll just have to pay him all season now for the odd appearance in the early cup rounds.
I doubt they'll care mate.
If they accepted the break clause and United cancelled the loan in January when Shaw was fit, they'd have to pay him for the rest of the season anyway.
Plus Boehley doesn't seem like the sort to lose sleep over a few extra weeks wages anyway!
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
No way! Who would have thought?
Yep, it was a hilarious misunderstanding for you.
Could care less about some naft LB.....just throw a freezer box out there......have we signed a fecking DM yet?
Yep, for the Glazers it’s all about cash and nothing else. They symbolise the dark age that the world finds itself in.
This one has been deleted whatever it was
Then I would call it bad luck just like everyone goes through. Our squad already has the highest number of players from top 5 (32, since yesterday 31). Do you want 40 players in a squad?
It is more than enough to have 3 players on that position and if really all three are injured which is seldom, then you either play someone out of position (Dalot…) or you let a young player jump in (Fernandez). Take a look at other clubs, City, Arsenal, Pool or Spurs - in these circumstances they play someone out of position or get a young prospect to replace the injured.
I just don’t see a point getting someone who haven’t really played in two years continuously on a good level instead of using our own players. But again I am glad it is us just paying Reguilon’s salary, no laon fee, no obligations to buy him and we can send him back in January when our injury situation hopefully improves.
They McTominayed themselves.
Just enough time to get Amarabat deal over the line.
16 hours.
Why is it a problem for us if a deal has obligation to buy?
It's not about that. It literally is about Covid losses, having been fined by UEFA a couple months ago and overspending. Sure, the Glazers putting in money would help but it's really about past spending catching up to us as well as an inability to get rid of the players that that spending meant for their wages.
Hopefully should be sorted within another season or two.
I’m convinced they played him on purpose to try and get more cash from us
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He's injured for a good part of the first half of the season and not played whereas McTominay has. Interesting that.
It would be ridiculous to rely on those 3 as our squad players. 1? Fine but 3 of them? No. We're not risking a Southampton 22/23 season.
Reguillon coming in would mean there are 4 fullbacks fit at the club.
Changes nothing what I've said. Interesting that.
You're adamant that Mainoo is ahead of McTominay based on no proof. I said something factual.
There is proof. Mainoo was preferred to McTominay during pre season, while the latter was on the market. Mainoo is a far bigger talent than McTominay.
Couldn't* care less
Just the type of club as expected.
surely every club has been offered the possibility to sign Mason Greenwood ? 
Do we pick one and say - "dear Lazio, we do not want Mason, but we feel you have the required morals (or lack of) to accomodate him in the future ?"
Do we pick one and say - "dear Lazio, we do not want Mason, but we feel you have the required morals (or lack of) to accomodate him in the future ?"No mention of Amrabat - doubling down on his “United were never interested” stance.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He's taken a massive shot to his credibility.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Welcome, Altay!
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Even if he doesn't join, it is fairly obvious that the club were interested and made attempts to sign him. So him not joining would do absolutely nothing for his credibility.
Completely forgot about Greenwood. Are we not a bit stuck if we don’t find a club for him today?
After the statement we put out about him not doing the things he was accused of and supporting him with his next move I’m not sure we will just cancel his contract.
But look at the glaring gaps in the squad. Mount feels like a luxury buy. We didn't need him. £60M that could've gone towards those gaps has gone on him.
I think he's a good player, I think he could be a good player for us in a future squad but it stands out like a sore thumb in amongst all of our poor planning and current scrambling to get anyone in on loan for dirt cheap. We had the money to get these players in, we spunked it on Mount. If he'd gone to Liverpool or Arsenal, hardly any of us would've been arsed.
Pretty sure we (as in the club) do want Mason though, so would probs be more along the lines of "hey Lazio you legends, you're just like us and we have a player that we both love do you want him?".surely every club has been offered the possibility to sign Mason Greenwood ?
There's a very good chance we already have. I'm not sure why people are assuming he's still a united player.
Mount is not a luxury buy, he's there to fill a hole we had in the first XI.
I get he's not your choice but he was the manager's and after learning the system he's looking to implement I actually think Mount fits well there.