Preach
Two balls on the pitch. An interesting miss by the officials.
- Thread starter laughtersassassin
- Start date
Missed that.
Just seen on twitter the Denmark FK should've been disallowed aswell as Denmark had players in the England wall instead of building their own one infront.
Just seen on twitter the Denmark FK should've been disallowed aswell as Denmark had players in the England wall instead of building their own one infront.
A little bit, yeah. But the short version is that unless it's interfering with play then the ref should just let it go. The OP claimed you can't play with 2 balls on the pitch when that is 100% false.
Wasn't affecting play so doesn't matter
Weird how non-English fans won't let us celebrate.
I didn't see it in the other thread. Not everything is that deep mate.
I was merely interested in showing it and seeing the exact rules etc.
I know 99% of the time play is instantly stopped regardless of if it interferes but for all I know that not the rule.
Maybe it's up to the ref to decide?
I think people on forums could do well to remember discussing something isn't always "moaning".
They didnt force you into this thread that is about a genuine talking point? It's not an English forum for feck sake
Discussions are not always required.
It takes a few minutes to check the rule. Conversation over after that.
I'm defensive but we have been attacked on a pure moment of joy for us.
It's coming home
I edited as I was unsure.
That's how the refs interpret the rule 99% of the time but if it's up to their own discretion then that is fine it's a non issue.
As someone said the Denmark player should have been smart and went and kicked it instantly stopping the attack hahah.
So I see.
This
Not all of us. I said it at the time that it was a dive. Imagine the reaction from the England fans and press if that happened to us. VAR fecked up.
Ssshhhh... An English player cheated to get a penalty and it led to a goal.. so for the first time in 55 years they've got a dodgy decision in their favour in a big game. But will ignore it and call everyone else salty because it's coming home.
Attacked? Wtf
Yes, it's an verb in the English language - criticize or oppose fiercely and publicly.Attacked? Wtf
We good?
U wot m8?
Highlighting a moment from the game is by no means an attack man.
Enjoy the win. They played well. Sterling on fire will cause Italy a lot of trouble.
Is Henry there to speak about cheating?
Maybe I was just on a roll, apologies.
Great to see the anti-English brigade out here inventing new rules. Anyone who backs science and evidence will know that the rule states that there is no obligation to stop the game in this situation and it is entirely up to the referees discretion. Fake newsing sad bastards.
I'm honestly baffled by the saltiness doing the rounds. England deservedly won, the much better team throughout bar a good Denmark spell in the first half and the penalty incident was a clear penalty. They were denied an even clearer penalty in the second half to boot.
The only bit of cheating England did tonight was that laser pen on Schmeichel just before the penalty. I really don't like seeing that at all.
The only bit of cheating England did tonight was that laser pen on Schmeichel just before the penalty. I really don't like seeing that at all.
Between this and the penalty call it sounds like England should not have made it through to the final. Yet here we are with England in the final. You love to see it.
Everything in football is entirely up to the referees discretion. A player could stab another player with a machete and it’s the referees discretion wether to send the player off for violent conduct.
The discussion re this topic is if the referee made the correct call or not - I.e was the extra ball interfering with play or not. My gut feeling is no as the ball was stationary and not really confusing to the players. However some people will disagree given the proximity of one ball to the other and it’s not exactly unusual for people on a football forum to want to discuss things like this.
Nah, they said that it was a pen but the game should have been stopped because of the second ball on the pitch.
The World Cup winner Desailly was there. How many World Cup winners do you have as pundits ?
Don't cry. Its coming home.
So am I. Specially on a United forum.
I agree with this. I somehow missed the laser pen, but if that's true, that's well out of line.
Don’t play the victim. If Danemark did that all England would be fuming. I thought english people hated cheating in football…
Nothing to do with United. United used to win by playing beautiful footy. England is very boring.
It depends at least between countries.. There wouldn't be many left in England if that was a requirement.
Two balls on a pitch
Jules Rimet still gleaming
Jules Rimet still gleaming
It was a dangerous situation for Denmark, a danish player should have played the ball like it was the live ball and start going forward, the ref would have been forced to whistle 
I'm not English, by the way. I used to live in London so for obvious reasons it's nice to see them do well but I wouldn't be losing any sleep had Denmark won. It's just that England were the much better team tonight and accusations of them being undeserved winners are bonkers.
Why ? To be honest, I liked old english teams as they had Beckham, Scholes, Rio, Rooney, Neville, so it felt like supporting United a bit (just a little bit). But now it makes me sick to watch Foden and Sterling up front, I cannot resolve myself to like them. It would probably different if Greenwood and Rashford were playing.
Plus, I don’t like Southgate and his negative brand of football.
I won't lose any sleep over this. We were much the better side, anyone with eyes could see it.
People love to hate England, it's just facts, especially on this board
What's Irish for "That here game should be replayed, like"?
No one is saying you weren't the better side.