Gladiator
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2012
- Messages
- 2,586
huh? lost me here man40 new appointments isn't nothing. The fans moan about everything these days.
huh? lost me here man40 new appointments isn't nothing. The fans moan about everything these days.
I suppose that's true. There were times when I felt SAF was content with the system he had in place. I don't like the thought that it was solely his and Gill's collective fault though, because I felt Woodward was in the wrong too. I did some snooping around and found a couple of old articles which partially explain the circumstances in which Woodward and Moyes had to take over. Obviously, I can't comment for the legitimacy of these articles, but if what is being suggested in them are true, it would mean that Moyes had already undertaken the revamping process, which leaves me a little confused. Does that mean even Moyes's structural changes were deemed as dated by the club or is it still very much a SAF thing ?I think the club as a whole club was guilty on ignoring problems due to on field success being sustained. From SAF to Gill, and not just SAF's brother. No offense, but I find blaming him a tad convenient. Sir Alex did move forward with the times but only as much as he had to (and largely restricted to on-the-pitch stuff), to get the job done IMO. Same with Gill. As long as he supported SAF in delivering trophies, things were good. The mistake made, and I bet it's a shared responsibility, is in not taking into account how much of what we put place worked by virtue of "having a good SAF thing going".
I don't mean to absolve Moyes and LVG of course, and I'm not even sure how much of these reports to take as gospel (probably none). But to me this sounds pretty believable given how the club has operated over the last 4-5 years - especially in it's cumbersome nature.
I'm not sure I follow with regards to the timing of this from Ed Woodard's POV? I mean, by all accounts, he was a bit of a fish out of water in his first year, and he's obviously tried to make the existing structure work for the last 1.5 years, and came to the conclusion, sometime back I should add, that some major changes are required. But these changes obviously don't happen overnight. A lot of analysis and audit goes into figuring out what the actual picture, what has to be done about and how.
Don't think this is anything but wanting to make sure we have the best possible chance to recruit top talents from around the world.If you look at the briefings from the club since Woodward has been here, you'd realize there is something to gain from not following through. Especially when you have brand loyalty
sure that's the intention which they are selling to people. if you can sell people on that, you don't really have to follow up with those results. you can get by doing the bare minimum because people are already sold on what you said you are going to do.Don't think this is anything but wanting to make sure we have the best possible chance to recruit top talents from around the world.
Can't see anything negative about this but some can't help but bash the club regardless.
So we have little interest in improving?sure that's the intention which they are selling to people. if you can sell people on that, you don't really have to follow up with those results. you can get by doing the bare minimum because people are already sold on what you said you are going to do.
Hang on, isn't it "the next Messi"?No. All we need to find the new Messi.
lolololololololTBF I wont be surprised if its Berta's or Maureen's work
You can have interest in improving without actually improving that much. Time will tell if we actually do but from what I've read above it's not really giving me much. If it's enough for you then fair dos. Just giving my view on how it comes across as more marketing speak than actual, fundamental, long-term change which will yield in better results. One thing saying it, whole 'nother beast doingSo we have little interest in improving?
What's with "enough for you"?You can have interest in improving without actually improving that much. Time will tell if we actually do but from what I've read above it's not really giving me much. If it's enough for you then fair dos. Just giving my view on how it comes across as more marketing speak than actual, fundamental, long-term change which will yield in better results. One thing saying it, whole 'nother beast doing
I'm laughing that you think life as a Man United supporter is hard for me. It's been quite calm actually. And it's just my interpretation regarding the marketing thing. Nothing more. Alot of that has to do with the fact we've been here before and because at the top of the hierarchal structure we have guys who don't really care about improving United for United's sake.What's with "enough for you"?
The club is clearly wanting to improve both with the academy and get a better scouting system in place and for the life of me I don't understand how you can take that as a marketing stunt? Life as a Man Utd supporter must be really hard for some
As we don't have any inside info what are we supposed to do though? Take every positive article as a marketing stunt?I'm laughing that you think life as a Man United supporter is hard for me. It's been quite calm actually. And it's just my interpretation regarding the marketing thing. Nothing more. Alot of that has to do with the fact we've been here before and because at the top of the hierarchal structure we have guys who don't really care about improving United for United's sake.
All you've done to me is regurgitate what's been said in the article because as a fan you want to believe that's what they want to do whether they actually thoroughly follow through or not. I'll wait.
nah you can just analyze and ask questions. I've said my view numerous times now so I think you get it but I don't take every positive article as marketing stunt. This one gave me that impression. Nothing more yoAs we don't have any inside info what are we supposed to do though? Take every positive article as a marketing stunt?
I get it but fair enough, we can't all agree.nah you can just analyze and ask questions. I've said my view numerous times now so I think you get it but I don't take every positive article as marketing stunt. This one gave me that impression. Nothing more yo
i come into any discussion knowing i likely won't agree with the other person. for me it's important we understand each other rather than that "agree to disagree" malarkeyI get it but fair enough, we can't all agree.
I do get it.i come into any discussion knowing i likely won't agree with the other person. for me it's important we understand each other rather than that "agree to disagree" malarkey
Attracting top tier talents from other youth academies is more a matter of negotiating rather than scouting.Doesn't the likes of Fosu-Mensah and Januzaj show that our scouting system is doing ok? It seems to me that a scouting system is much more important when it comes to youth signings. Good players do not stay unknown for long especially these days. And will never do great in South America because of Work Permit regulations.
cool. sorry probably went overboard thereI do get it.
Well i mean papers do tend to be used in this way.Yes, the club would be using only Charles Sale of Daily Mail as a marketing tool and no other newspaper for this particular news. Poor marketing from United's team if that's the case.
I don't think that it's a marketing stunt because from what I see, we are changing the club structure. I suspect that we are going to follow some of the continental organizations like Porto, Atletico or Sporting CP with more scouts and more administrative personal where everyone is highly specialized.You can have interest in improving without actually improving that much. Time will tell if we actually do but from what I've read above it's not really giving me much. If it's enough for you then fair dos. Just giving my view on how it comes across as more marketing speak than actual, fundamental, long-term change which will yield in better results. One thing saying it, whole 'nother beast doing
Sure though we know little in terms of the competence of this scouting structure or the "changing of the club structure" you're talking about. I think if we get Berta from Atletico as a DOF that would be an interesting and potentially positive change to the club but there's still a fair amount of assumptions there which is more or less what I'm getting at. I think as fans we make positive assumptions because we want to see the best for our club whether or not that's actually going to pan out. Hope's a bitch sometimes.I don't think that it's a marketing stunt because from what I see, we are changing the club structure. I suspect that we are going to follow some of the continental organizations like Porto, Atletico or Sporting CP with more scouts and more administrative personal where everyone is highly specialized.
I know that it's not accurate but in terms of scouting if you compare Arsenal numbers and a club like Sporting CP, Arsenal have 2 scouts in London and claim to have few worldwide while Sporting have 150 scouts, now Sporting are an extreme most big clubs have 20 or more scouts.
You are making positive or negative assumptions, I'm not rating the potential changes but only acknowledging that the club is restructuring, we will only judge the changes in due time.Sure though we know little in terms of the competence of this scouting structure or the "changing of the club structure" you're talking about. I think if we get Berta from Atletico as a DOF that would be an interesting and potentially positive change to the club but there's still a fair amount of assumptions there which is more or less what I'm getting at. I think as fans we make positive assumptions because we want to see the best for our club whether or not that's actually going to pan out. Hope's a bitch sometimes.
Hm i'm not sure how things will go which pretty much outlines my views in this thread. My initial impression was it reeks of marketing talk and I haven't seen anything to stray from that viewpoint. If you find that negative then so be it. You are entitled to that.You are making positive or negative assumptions, I'm not rating the potential changes but only acknowledging that the club is restructuring, we will only judge the changes in due time.
If they wanted to use something as a marketing tool to get the fans onside you'd think a large marketing team could do a lot better than leaking a story to 1 paper about changes to the scouting team. That's apart from the fact that they've already actually started hiring the scouts. The idea on here that any negative story about United must be true while any positive 1 is dismissed or must be a plant by the club to make themselves look good has reached bizarre levels.Yes, the club would be using only Charles Sale of Daily Mail as a marketing tool and no other newspaper for this particular news. Poor marketing from United's team if that's the case.
The problem is that you label it as a marketing stunt and at the same time say that you can't judge based on the article. You have to see the problem, right?Hm i'm not sure how things will go which pretty much outlines my views in this thread. My initial impression was it reeks of marketing talk and I haven't seen anything to stray from that viewpoint. If you find that negative then so be it. You are entitled to that.
As I've thread to @Red Katie I've given my impression and nothing more. Can't really judge based on an article.
I'm saying I can't judge what it really means because i view it as a marketing stunt therefore i find it vacuous.The problem is that you label it as a marketing stunt and at the same time say that you can't judge based on the article. You have to see the problem, right?
The club are really doing what they are saying, they are hiring scouts and they are bringing administrative personal, the only missing piece seems to be Berta, if Berta is confirmed then the club will have done everything they said.
The bottom line is that the scouting / youth structure has to be set up to as much retain talent as it is to find it. My feeling as that we seemed to have struggled to keep rather than find players these last few years.
I suspect there's always been change with scouting, maybe this is more co-ordinated. Maybe it's just got a heading and a press release - either way it's good the club is appearing to make positive moves. Let's hope it actually is!
My Dad retired from scouting at United in January, he'd scouted so long that I'm not sure there's even definitive evidence of how long, earlier than 1963 for sure. He's seen an awful lot of change and as any true football scout, he's never said a word! Who knows. The world of being a football scout appears to have been like being an MI5 spy, only a bit more secretive!
Sadly what you said is true. This thread has been littered with some of your posts which were completely overlooked and this article is not even the first time I have heard of this. When the Butt appointment was made as well, there were plenty of articles that were suggesting we were revamping many structures of the club. I'm usually a pessimist myself, but even for me this style of thinking is very disappointing.The idea on here that any negative story about United must be true while any positive 1 is dismissed or must be a plant by the club to make themselves look good has reached bizarre levels.
Son of the guy who managed Denmark when we won the euros in '92. Anyway, I thought he was mainly a coach but I guess he's here to cover Denmark and possibly the rest of Scandinavia.We've brought in Tommy Moller Nielsen as a senior scout