I wonder if he prefers Julian or Gregorian?
US Politics
- Thread starter Nick 0208 Ldn
- Start date
No, but I swear it isn't far off! It's crazy how many times he mentioned it.Is this an actual quote!?
Who have a sponsorship with Budweiser.
Calendars and beer, name a more iconic duo.
If there is one thing I agree with Brett on its that the state of this country is a disgrace. The world continues to look on with bewilderment I'm sure.
Pirelli.
Only reason I drank beer when 17 was to get drunk. Didn't like the taste back then. I think that's true about most teenagers...
But Brett seemed to drink it cause he liked it so much.... strange in my ears.
But Brett seemed to drink it cause he liked it so much.... strange in my ears.
It's always awkward, as you have the "why have you not mentioned anything about this in 30 years", which will always be greeted with "no one would believe me, shame, etc" which is hard to argue.
But it's still frustrating, as saying something at the time might give some first hand evidence, and stop someone in their tracks. Like we would have seen with Savile, and seemingly ever DJ of the period.
The deflection on the FBI question from Feinstein should do it if we lived in a fairer world. He was not convincing at all.
The Dems should keep on it.
The Dems should keep on it.
I'm already using that on my tombstoneIs this an actual quote!?
At least he showed that he's just an originalist and not some kind of ultra-partisan hack
Dems should ask him if he's planning to be a judge for all Americans or only the right. The accusatory tone he took as if it's all a left wing conspiracy by default strips of his position to be a fair supreme court judge.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I don't think I have any iota of doubt that he is lying.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I'm surprised he didn't shout at himself "stop saying beer you idiot, you've already said you weren't ever drunk..mm beer"
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Can't wait to see her get stuck in.
Brave Sir Robin.
He's doing what repub senators need. Testifying forcefully and giving them an excuse to vote to confirm. It's he said/she said and he's convincing enough with his denial for them to vote for him. Without other testimony and an investigation he's off the hook.
He's Alan Partridge.
Just had to make a comforting Horlicks drink...feel drained after watching that performance.
They will still confirm, they'll say that he was believable. That is all they need from him.
Dont doubt it. Pathetic naturally but thats the American 'justice' system.
So he believes that Ford is telling the truth and was assaulted, and the committee is justifiably looking into it, but at the same time this is a circus/farce/digrace? So all that talk about due process does not apply to him?
Got a call at work and missed everything after his opening statement. Is it over?
I feel the other Dems should cede their time to the ones who used to be prosecutors. Feinstein did a poor job when he deflected the question and starting ranting.
No, he’s having a break, will be back in soon.
Glad to see I'm not the only one watching this instead of working.
Let's hypothetically imagine he is innocent. Why wouldn't he want an FBI investigation? I mean are there any reasons, political or otherwise, that would make this a prefferable route for him?
Is anyone else listening to the CSpan call ins
He still looks angry.
Edit: Also, arent supreme court judges supposed to be non partisan? Mentioning the fecking Clintons and barking at the democratic senators because he is on the bench seems like an odd move for someone who is supposedly non partisan
You missed him sniffing.
I accidently clicked the fox news youtube channel for the stream. Those comments. It's not pretty
He'll pretend that the FBI is biased (à la Trump) but, in reality, he fears what the FBI might discover.
Would he allow someone to talk all over the questioner the way he is.
Leahy not putting up with his bullshit