Except the only people not getting exactly what they want are the far-right social conservatives. The power blocs of the Republican party (corporatists and the wealthiest) have gotten everything they could possibly want from Roberts. It's why there are tons of articles calling Roberts the pro-money/pro-business court. Sure a few minor decisions that didn't go all the way to reverse abortion as far-right extremists wanted received front-page news and upset a crazy far-right loon like Pence who, in another time he'd be seen as insane, but the majority of decisions have gone a long way toward pushing everything else very far right:
"Four of these 13 cases—
FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life,
Davis v. FEC,
Citizens United v. FEC, and
McCutcheon v. FEC—systemically decimated both the historic Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as McCain-Feingold or BCRA) and prior Court precedents limiting corporate spending in elections.
[11] "
"The Roberts Five also permitted aggressive racial and partisan gerrymandering,
[18] limited the rights of minorities to challenge racially concentrated districts,
[19] allowed purges of voting rolls that have been shown to disproportionately disqualify minority votes,
[20] and permitted voting under electoral maps that a federal district court concluded were drawn with racially discriminatory intent.
[21] Every single map and policy upheld had been crafted by Republican legislatures and politicians."
"
In 33 cases—the largest category by far, full of hugely important decisions that rarely make front-page news—the Roberts Five have engaged in a two-front effort to insulate corporations from liability: they have limited the ability of government agencies to regulate corporate acts; and they have made it harder for individuals harmed by corporate acts to have their rights vindicated in court. "
"In
14 Penn Plaza v. Pyett, the Court held 5-4 that unions could bargain away workers’ rights to have age discrimination claims heard in court.
[34] In
Rent-A-Center v. Jackson, the same right-wing bloc held that would-be litigants challenging an arbitration agreement as unconscionable would have to challenge the unfairness of the arbitration before the very arbitrator whose legitimacy to hear the case they disputed.
[35] Also in 2010, the Court prohibited the use of class arbitration unless all parties specifically agreed to it.
[36] Less than a year later, in
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, the Robert Five prevented consumers from bringing class-action suits against corporations for low-dollar, high-volume frauds "
" In
Carhart,
Hobby Lobby, and
NIFLA, the Roberts Five delivered anti-choice victories to the religious right.
[58] This same constituency saw four partisan victories in cases involving the separation of church and state:
Hein,
Buono,
Winn, and
Galloway.
[59]"
and much more:
https://www.acslaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Court-capture-IB-Appendix-Table-A-2.pdf
https://www.acslaw.org/issue_brief/...the-integrity-of-todays-supreme-court/#_ftn45
