17Larsson
Not a malefactor just a lagomorph
That's an unbelievable decision. Disgusting dive
Was there ever any doubt that would be the case?Liverpool have gotten absolutely everything in their favour since that spurs decision
Anthony Taylor gave it on field so if VAR wasn’t there it would still be givenCan var die already?
Yeah and they had everything for years before it too. Literally one thing goes against them in years and they whined nonstop. But clearly it works and influences the officials, so it’s hard to say their moaning isn’t justified.Liverpool have gotten absolutely everything in their favour since that spurs decision
This have happen even before. It is no wonder people have been calling them Livarpool since VAR have been introduced. Amount of decision going their way is amazing.Liverpool have gotten absolutely everything in their favour since that spurs decision
Sorry but that’s nonsense. Off the top of my head they were denied a clear penalty against Arsenal for a handball by Odegaard, and then had a goal disallowed against Burnley when the player deemed to be interfering with play was blatantly pushed into this position by a defender.Liverpool have gotten absolutely everything in their favour since that spurs decision
He'd be going absolutely berserk if it was given the other way, too. There is a chance at least Howe loses his head over it so there is that.If no journalist asks Klopp if he will be demanding a replay, they’re all spineless sack of client journalism shits.
Most of them are hanging out the back of him. Anyone dares question him and they get the bullying treatment.If no journalist asks Klopp if he will be demanding a replay, they’re all spineless sack of client journalism shits.
Dives are new?The game is dead
Where do the rules state that it matters how you end up being in an offside position? Do the laws also make exceptions for players if they play someone onside because they're drinking from the goalkeeper's water bottle while play is ongoing and stuff like that?Sorry but that’s nonsense. Off the top of my head they were denied a clear penalty against Arsenal for a handball by Odegaard, and then had a goal disallowed against Burnley when the player deemed to be interfering with play was blatantly pushed into this position by a defender.
You’re in the VAR thread mate. Context mattersDives are new?
And it would be infinitely less annoying because we haven’t had football as a watching experience ruined by a system whose only upside is (allegedly) correcting obvious errors like that one.Anthony Taylor gave it on field so if VAR wasn’t there it would still be given
Haha you really think they'll pick this one for their mic'd up show?Yes there is contact but there can be contact. It doesn’t automatically make it a foul or penalty.
Howard Webb has been very clear about that in Mic’d Up, when criticising the the one given against Wolves (infact two, the one V Newcastle and the one V Sheff United from memory)
Will be interesting to see what’s said about this. A clear dive and the contact wasn’t enough to bring about a foul. Why they didn’t send him to the monitor is unbelievable really and shows this professional body aren’t learning anything as the season goes on.
Honestly, I presume people commenting like this have never done any physical activity in their lives, I'm mainly running now and I can tell you, when you clip something at speed, you can continue for 3/4/5 strides while off balance and eventually go down. I don't know if Diaz could have stayed up or not, but the fact is, he was fouled, if that was a Utd player, you'd be calling 100% penalty, take the blinkers off.There was 3 like that yesterday and only 1 was given. Gallagher was asked about them on ref watch and he wouldn't give a straight answer about any of them yes or no.
Diaz should have been booked for diving.
You should be ashamed mate. If any of our players did that I’d be horrified and call them out for it. Absolutely pathetic behaviour.His elbow caught Jota. It’s a penalty with a delayed dive with contact which will never get overturned by VAR. Jota should have stayed up and scored but he’s not here to appease supporters.Either way it’s a goal.
There wasn’t enough contact. It’s pretty clear.His elbow caught Jota. It’s a penalty with a delayed dive with contact which will never get overturned by VAR. Jota should have stayed up and scored but he’s not here to appease supporters.Either way it’s a goal.