Wayne Rooney | 2012-14 Performances

Status
Not open for further replies.

Name Changed

weso26
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
27,395
Location
Dublin
I tend to agree. I don't think he has that explosive burst that used to get him extra time and space against defenders. I think he could evolve into a quality midfield player.
 

NotoriousISSY

$10mil and I fecked it up!
Joined
Mar 20, 2012
Messages
16,302
Location
up north
I've said for ages, he should be used as a natural replacement for Paul Scholes.

He's always had the range of passing required for a midfield player, he tracks back well and would get forward and support the way a younger Scholes used to.
Arguably, Scholes' best ever season was 02/03 and not simply because he scored 20 goals, he was just the catalyst for almost everything we did with his passing and movement. He used to play off Ruud usually in front of Keane and Veron? Now because in the last 5/6 years Scholes has played a lot deeper they don't think it's plausible to say Rooney can step into his shoes, but when he plays well he's probably the most similar player to a younger Scholes that's out there.

The instinct to pop up for goals, he can score a screamer, his long range passing is wonderful. Rooney can overplay things and be wasteful at times, but when comparing him to Scholes, you will always pick up a flaw or two because Scholes is/was the most talented British player of his generation.
 

Plechazunga

Grammar partisan who sleeps with a real life Ryan
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
51,762
Location
Where Albert Stubbins scored a diving header
So considering your summary of his creative strengths and limitations, do you genuinely feel they are of such a level that they should take priority over his obvious goal-scoring ability?

I think there are some untruths about Rooney's best role being as a #10. Rooney, while being a good passer for a striker, has never been renowned for being particularly creative I don't think. The notion that he's best suited to the role of a second-striker has been around for many years, and if people remember correctly, it was largely put down to his ability and or willingness to run at defenders that caused people to feel he was best utilised slightly deeper. Never been about his creativity as such. I think as he has been less willing or able to run at defenders, his best role is certainly furthest forward, on the end of chances. I think it is clear, for instance, that someone like Shinji has a more specialised skillset to be a central 'creator' than Rooney.
I think if you have Rooney and RVP in the same side, you play Rooney deep. No, he's not Zidane, and he's not going to split defences with one pass that much, but hardly anyone in football can.

He generally thrives in that position. It's not just about running at people - which I agree is something he's lost a bit - it's about being the focal point of the team, linking defence and attack as moves develop. Even this season I thought he worked pretty damn well paired with Van Persie (including, as it happens, a few fairly magical defence-splitting passes).

Arguably, Scholes' best ever season was 02/03 and not simply because he scored 20 goals, he was just the catalyst for almost everything we did with his passing and movement. He used to play off Ruud usually in front of Keane and Veron? Now because in the last 5/6 years Scholes has played a lot deeper they don't think it's plausible to say Rooney can step into his shoes, but when he plays well he's probably the most similar player to a younger Scholes that's out there.

The instinct to pop up for goals, he can score a screamer, his long range passing is wonderful. Rooney can overplay things and be wasteful at times, but when comparing him to Scholes, you will always pick up a flaw or two because Scholes is/was the most talented British player of his generation.
But there's no real difference between where Scholes played in that set-up and how Rooney plays as a withdrawn striker anyway.
 

Amir

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2000
Messages
25,006
Location
Rehovot, Israel
May had just 9 appearances that season. We were really out of options
Those 9 games included some of the matches in the title run in and the cup final. It certainly seemed logical to play him and Stam at the back, with Johnsen and Butt in midfield, Giggs on the left and Becks on the right. Looking back at how we looked for most of the game, we probably SHOULD have done that.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,569
May had just 9 appearances that season. We were really out of options

I remember Jesper's old interview stating that he played the CL final despite being injured + it costed him his career. It was certainly his last game with the club

What's all this talk of it ruining his career? Wasn't the main injury a knee injury sustained that next pre season?

As for May, at least if he'd played in that final it would have justified him parading around after right in the middle of the celebrations John Terry style!
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,581
Location
Ireland
I wonder when we'll hear more news on the situation, I really hope it doesn't drag on and on.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,478
We all know he doesn't want to be here anymore it's time we sold him and moved on. You can put one transfer request in and say it was a mistake or a tactic to get a new contact but 2 transfer requests in 3 seasons and a change in attitude on the field and there's only one thing to do and that's to feck him off.
 

204Red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
2,543
Location
Canada
But there's no real difference between where Scholes played in that set-up and how Rooney plays as a withdrawn striker anyway.
Except that I'd waaaaaay rather have the Scholes from 02/03 than the Rooney of now filling that role.

Although I will admit, that if Moyes talks him into staying (or points out to him that realistically there really very few transfer options for him that would suit the club- which eliminates City / Chelsea) that this is the role Rooney will fill.
 

Red Shorts

Forrest Gimp
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
12,424
Location
Location, Location
From what I gather, a lot of this saga is to do with Rooney and Fergie's relationship recently. Now Fergie is retiring, he will have to think twice about what his reasons for leaving are now, because Moyes may have entirely different plans for him in terms of playing time and position.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,295
Location
...
I've said for ages, he should be used as a natural replacement for Paul Scholes.

He's always had the range of passing required for a midfield player, he tracks back well and would get forward and support the way a younger Scholes used to.
Well given he is a striker, how on earth can he be seen as a 'natural' replacement for Scholes? If he does replace him, it will be a very unnatural replacement.
 

Adzzz

Astrophysical Genius - Hard for Grinner
Staff
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
32,781
Location
Kebab Shop
You know that point is totally irrelevant because Evra was never a top-class forward at a proper level. What is it with some folk on here?!
 

Plechazunga

Grammar partisan who sleeps with a real life Ryan
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
51,762
Location
Where Albert Stubbins scored a diving header
So has this moved on at all or are we in just the same place we were on Sunday?
No change in his actual contract status, but there has been some movement on here: we've now convinced ourselves that he's not only a greedy cnut and a terrible human being who hates Man United, but also a functional alcoholic who's terrible at football and can no longer run. Not to mention that he orchestrated the entire timing of Fergie's retirement, as part of his sinister masterplan, despite being thick as pigshit.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,582
Location
Salford
When I picture Rooney joining Barcelona, all I can think of is their training sessions being like that John Smiths advert.

Messi plays with it a bit, passes to Iniesta who does some stepovers and keepy-uppys, then to Dani Alves who catches it on the back of his neck then flicks it to Rooney.. PUNT.. "Av it"
 

Sassy Colin

Death or the gladioli!
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
71,315
Location
Aliens are in control of my tagline & location
No change in his actual contract status, but there has been some movement on here: we've now convinced ourselves that he's not only a greedy cnut and a terrible human being who hates Man United, but also a functional alcoholic who's terrible at football and can no longer run. Not to mention that he orchestrated the entire timing of Fergie's retirement, as part of his sinister masterplan, despite being thick as pigshit.
Out! GET HIM OUT!
 

Earthquake

Pokemon expert
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
35,456
Location
Lemmy has forsaken us....
When I picture Rooney joining Barcelona, all I can think of is their training sessions being like that John Smiths advert.

Messi plays with it a bit, passes to Iniesta who does some stepovers and keepy-uppys, then to Dani Alves who catches it on the back of his neck then flicks it to Rooney.. PUNT.. "Av it"
Funnily enough, Barca could probably do with a bit of "av it" from time to time. :D
 

Plechazunga

Grammar partisan who sleeps with a real life Ryan
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
51,762
Location
Where Albert Stubbins scored a diving header
When I picture Rooney joining Barcelona, all I can think of is their training sessions being like that John Smiths advert.

Messi plays with it a bit, passes to Iniesta who does some stepovers and keepy-uppys, then to Dani Alves who catches it on the back of his neck then flicks it to Rooney.. PUNT.. "Av it"
Exactly! Because Rooney's such a guileless oaf with a football.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.