We are an awfully coached team

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,950
So if De Gea would have saved a penalty in May, we wouldn't be having these threads you reckon?
Well he certainly wouldn't have the words won feck all after his name but seriously you can't compare a serial winner to a novice who's not improving enough.
 

Harold_Giles

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2005
Messages
1,234
Location
Iceland
Well he certainly wouldn't have the words won feck all after his name but seriously you can't compare a serial winner to a novice who's not improving enough.
It's a difference of opinions really.
I do feel the team is making steady improvements.

This season is key though. We have a great squad, midfield options aside.
We need to have a great season, no excuses.
I'll agree with a manager change if this season goes to shit.
I just feel the talk of changing managers and the general negativity on here is a bit premature after 4 games in the league, with 10 points on the board.
 

mancan92

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
10,218
Location
Loughborough university
Let the excuses roll out for Pep. It makes for good reading. People will cling to their beliefs no matter what is presented to them. 1 shot against Southampton. Not even a red card to make excuses for. Wow! Imagine if that was United and Ole. It would be a shitshow on here.

Pep turns his players into robots. He is way to strict with his pattern of play with no plan b. Some of the football they play is nice. But most of it is boring. Possession for just possession sakes. I've always felt his team's bore the opposition to death then attack.

Just like people say not getting a midfielder was Ole's fault. Then isn't Pep not getting a striker his fault? I'm sure I'll hear a 1000 excuses.

People have their narrative written about Ole. Hence he gets a rough time. Pep has a narrative written about him. Hence he always has people giving out excuses.

Let them roll. It's good reading watching some never back down. Moving the goalposts. The but, but, but Pep. Hahaha
Pep has won every major trophy in existence and got records galore. That affords you leeway. Ole has won nothing that is why he gets critiqued.
 

Harold_Giles

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2005
Messages
1,234
Location
Iceland
So it’s just pure tribalism then? Got it.
Of course some tribalism is involved, this is football.

What I find strange are the United fans that come on here to defend City and Pep.
Some even arguing that yesterday was a better City perfomance than United's against Southampton.
 

Olecurls99

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2021
Messages
2,168
What dreams that? Winning feck all every season? Keep Ole on because he played for us and that's the Utd way? Fergie and Busby never played for Utd and had no connection prior and those were our best managers. Doc, Atkinson, VG and Mourinho won the littler trophies and guess what, they also had no connection.
The dream that we're not a chop and change modern club.
That our belief in good things coming to those who wait will pay off.
The same dream saw Fergie given 7 years before he won the league. Our loyalty and patience was paid off in spades.
That's the dream. That we're not a soulless husk of a club.
 

smi11ie

Not a philogynist
Newbie
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
885
Location
Buri Ram
Supports
Rangers
I’ve written much about this topic before. It’s a myth and typical nonsense which is easy to believe in, especially if they haven’t played on the highest level.

But probably more fun with a crazy manager on the sideline :lol:
I don't care what you have written before. I like a manager who is involved in the match.

If it doesn't matter then why do Ronaldo, Klopp and other high profile pros do it? I am looking forward to a very good answer!

The expression is "AT the highest level" not "ON". Ja?
 
Last edited:

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,414
Location
Berlin
The dream that we're not a chop and change modern club.
That our belief in good things coming to those who wait will pay off.
The same dream saw Fergie given 7 years before he won the league. Our loyalty and patience was paid off in spades.
That's the dream. That we're not a soulless husk of a club.
While understanding that sentiment, I think it is to one-sided. I mean, apart from Fergie, how often does it happen, that somebody is going to stay for so long having so much success? Wenger won his first titles in his 2nd year at the Gunners. So all in all, I know, the Fergie story is one of the greatest in sports but how realistic is it to expect that the same thing happens again? And that the only deciding factor was in fact the time?

I also don't think that teams like Real Madrid, Barcelona or Bayern are soulless husks. It feels like you try to construct a world, where we can "do the right thing" and remain with our soul intact plus successful. Doesn't feel realistic to me at all. Again, the results have been really good and I am not for sacking him just to get rid because he is "soooo bad" but for me, it needs to be noted that he didn't show too many indicators that he can be one of the great managers. He did a very good job recruiting and creating an atmosphere, but I think, it is at least debatable if these are the most important aspects for being a manager these days. Because who knows, if your Fergie story would even be applicable these days.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,950
The dream that we're not a chop and change modern club.
That our belief in good things coming to those who wait will pay off.
The same dream saw Fergie given 7 years before he won the league. Our loyalty and patience was paid off in spades.
That's the dream. That we're not a soulless husk of a club.
Let's hope your right then and it is only hope. Fergie won the FA cup in his third full season. Let's hope Ole can at least win something.
 

Kelly15

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
245
Oh lord...I do not think I have ever heard a football fan...ever...say that Pep’s Barcelona, with Xavi, Iniesta, Messi and Busquets, telepathically, routinely and majestically playing teams completely off the park for 90 minutes, and crediting their coach saying his training and philosophy expanded their very understanding of football ...was possession for possession sake? Their is being bias and then there is blind hate for city perhaps...but that’s just a bonkers statement for anyone with eyes! Fuk shots on target...why are these stats rolled out? You can have a beautiful, skilful build up and the ball gets headed an inch past the post. Doesn’t change that fact that as a fan, you saw a passage of excellent and exciting football. City battered Southampton and more often then not they will win those games as they did on their mad run last season. They play the odds. They play how they play creating chance after chance and if on an off day they don’t score and draw or lose, that’s the price paid for seeing that particular style of football every week. Any city fan who complains is a clown. We are far less consistent then city in terms of results, general performance levels and dominating/creating chances against lesser teams. So we might just focus on ourselves before throwing shit at other very fuking good football teams.


Your post has the feel of the cringeworthy rantings of a man who looks at some Instagram models pictures all day, knows he ain’t got a chance, so postS on her page that he actually doesn’t find skin tight leggings attractive!
I don't have to agree with you just like you don't have to agree with me. Your post is a perfect example of what I was talking about. That's some good stuff. I can feel your bitterness. Post is full of emotion. And to end it off ad hominem attacks.

"Felix Magath claims Pep Guardiola would have won the Champions League with Bayern Munich or Manchester City if it weren’t for his “boring style” of football.

Guardiola claimed the second of his two Champions League gongs in 2011, but Magath claims “Messi won the titles”.

"Without Messi, this system has never worked as successfully for Guardiola, otherwise he would have won the Champions League with Bayern or Manchester City long ago.

Tiki-taka only works if you have players who are technically superior to their opponents. For the spectator, holding the ball, as I call it, is just boring and a top team doesn’t really need it.""
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,816
I don't have to agree with you just like you don't have to agree with me. Your post is a perfect example of what I was talking about. That's some good stuff. I can feel your bitterness. Post is full of emotion. And to end it off ad hominem attacks.

"Felix Magath claims Pep Guardiola would have won the Champions League with Bayern Munich or Manchester City if it weren’t for his “boring style” of football.

Guardiola claimed the second of his two Champions League gongs in 2011, but Magath claims “Messi won the titles”.

"Without Messi, this system has never worked as successfully for Guardiola, otherwise he would have won the Champions League with Bayern or Manchester City long ago.

Tiki-taka only works if you have players who are technically superior to their opponents. For the spectator, holding the ball, as I call it, is just boring and a top team doesn’t really need it.""
Felix fecking Magath calling someone else's football boring is peak levels irony.
 

Eplel

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2016
Messages
1,938
Felix fecking Magath calling someone else's football boring is peak levels irony.
Are we going to pretend that he didn't win the Bundesliga with Wolfsburg playing great football? Is his stint at Fulham his defining career part?
 

TheMagicFoolBus

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
6,600
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Supports
Chelsea
ah Grafite.. thats a name i haven't heard in a while. What was the story with him? had 1 sensational season with Wolfsburg and that was that?
More or less! He only played 5 seasons in Europe - left Wolfsburg for a nice paycheque in the Middle East before retiring to Brazil.
 

Ayush_reddevil

Éire Abú
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
10,777
We can sign 50 more players but it won’t change the fact that we are huffing & puffing for vast majority of games and our football is nauseating to watch
 

ClassOf'99

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2016
Messages
709
Surely a team as big as United practice transitions? It really doesn't look like we confident to pass quickly, every player 2-3 touches then a sideways/backwards but as soon as we play a quick transition to Greenwood suddenly we look amazing, it's baffling!
 

wolffy

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
59
Location
West Yorkshire
The Ole Out lot refuse to acknowledge the progress the club has made since the dark days of moyes/van gaal/mourinho.

If we win the league this year they'll say it was nothing to do with Ole.
Why were they dark days? We win trophies with theses managers in the same time as OGS has been here. OGS has won nothing, no tactics, lousy subs, we rely on individual moments of brilliance to win matches.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,816
Are we going to pretend that he didn't win the Bundesliga with Wolfsburg playing great football? Is his stint at Fulham his defining career part?
More his stint at Bayern. I didn't even remember he was at Fulham.

I'm being unfair to him, yes, but he's dour as feck and his coaching philosophy is 'make them run 30 kms uphill every day'
 

marktan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
6,937
I genuinely believe if we had one player, one player that could stay out wide on the left, and dribble down to the byline and get a ball in, we'd genuinely be a top top team. It's the one flaw we have, way too narrow and we don't attack the flanks and stretch play the way City does. It's one of the most effective ways to break down compact defences. There's Ronaldo and Greenwood in the box that can finish, we just need to get to the byline and get balls into the box.

Someone like Saint-Maximin would be ideal, but I'd even take someone like Adama Traore.
 

Amadaeus

Pochémon Fan Club Chairman
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
9,234
Location
Amongst footballing managerial 'Gods'
I genuinely believe if we had one player, one player that could stay out wide on the left, and dribble down to the byline and get a ball in, we'd genuinely be a top top team. It's the one flaw we have, way too narrow and we don't attack the flanks and stretch play the way City does. It's one of the most effective ways to break down compact defences. There's Ronaldo and Greenwood in the box that can finish, we just need to get to the byline and get balls into the box.

Someone like Saint-Maximin would be ideal, but I'd even take someone like Adama Traore.
We spent 70m on Sancho. Plus have an £100m plus player in Rashford coming back. Moreover, a highly rated young wide player in Armand. What we lack is proper coaching. We have an amazing team. If we get rice next summer, I don’t think no one will have a better team than us.
 

Olecurls99

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2021
Messages
2,168
While understanding that sentiment, I think it is to one-sided. I mean, apart from Fergie, how often does it happen, that somebody is going to stay for so long having so much success? Wenger won his first titles in his 2nd year at the Gunners. So all in all, I know, the Fergie story is one of the greatest in sports but how realistic is it to expect that the same thing happens again? And that the only deciding factor was in fact the time?

I also don't think that teams like Real Madrid, Barcelona or Bayern are soulless husks. It feels like you try to construct a world, where we can "do the right thing" and remain with our soul intact plus successful. Doesn't feel realistic to me at all. Again, the results have been really good and I am not for sacking him just to get rid because he is "soooo bad" but for me, it needs to be noted that he didn't show too many indicators that he can be one of the great managers. He did a very good job recruiting and creating an atmosphere, but I think, it is at least debatable if these are the most important aspects for being a manager these days. Because who knows, if your Fergie story would even be applicable these days.
It's not just sentimentality. It also makes sense.
What's the point in backing a manager to rebuild the team and just as he gets it close to the way he wants it you clear him out and start again with another manager?
If he was underperforming I would understand but he's been doing really well with the squads at his disposal each season.
Everyone agrees he's hugely improved the squad so be thankful for that and let's back him.
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
We're an absolute mess tactically at the moment.

Thank feck we have such great players up front.
 

shahzy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2014
Messages
985
I genuinely believe if we had one player, one player that could stay out wide on the left, and dribble down to the byline and get a ball in, we'd genuinely be a top top team. It's the one flaw we have, way too narrow and we don't attack the flanks and stretch play the way City does. It's one of the most effective ways to break down compact defences. There's Ronaldo and Greenwood in the box that can finish, we just need to get to the byline and get balls into the box.

Someone like Saint-Maximin would be ideal, but I'd even take someone like Adama Traore.
Well that's what Sancho is supposed to be. The dribbler. As well as Greenwood on the other side. Martial should be able to do it otherwise get rid.

We need dribblers. Every good side needs dribblers that can carry the ball forward. You can't just pass it forward all the time.
 

marktan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
6,937
We spent 70m on Sancho. Plus have an £100m plus player in Rashford com back. What we lack is proper coaching. We have an amazing team. If we get rice next summer, I don’t think no one will have a better team than us.
Neither of them are great dribblers. Sancho's technically good on the ball but slow so doesn't take players on from a standing start, whereas Rashford's the opposite in that he's fast but doesn't have great close dribbling. Both are better passers.
It's not going to happen because as you say we've spent £70m on Sancho, but it's the biggest difference for me between the SAF era and the post-SAF eras. Our teams always had pace out wide before. Greenwood's good on the ball but he comes narrow often to try and score.
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,699
Are we?
We simply don't know how to control games
Yes. We're dominating possession and only went behind because of a hideous deflected goal. We've had the most shots on target in the first half by any team this season, we've hit the post and had Ronaldo clean through on goal. Odd to describe it any other way.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Forgetting the actual results so far this season (positive or negative and including today's, which may well still end up being a win for us), the way we actually play has the same consistent problems directly related to our coaching.

In basic terms our players don't take up the right positions in relation to each other consistently enough for us to have as much control as we should, as our players too often receive the ball in positions where they're isolated and immediately under pressure when they receive the ball. That combined with pre-planned sequences of play seemingly not being as well formed as they could be makes our play slow.

Where we want our players to be able to play quick one and two touch football with teammates in good positions and making almost instaneous pre-drilled movements in relation to each other, we instead get players having to take multiple touches before they can find teammates and delayed, reactive movements in relation to each other.

And then those problems also translate to our ability to defend and deal with transitions too. We're just too loose and scrappy positionally.
 
Last edited:

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,840
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
There can't be any complaints so far today. Shape has looked excellent, we have created plenty of chances and their goal was another spawny deflection.

West Ham away is going to be tricky this season. Even if we get a point, i'm more encouraged by us playing well and being unlucky as opposed to lucky wins like the Wolves game
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,280
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
Yes. We're dominating possession and only went behind only because of a hideous deflected goal. We've had the shots on target in the first half by any team this season, we've hit the post and we had already put Ronaldo clean through. Odd to describe it any other way.
Agreed, played well today bar a shaky 5/10mins after the Maguire mistake.
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,699
There can't be any complaints so far today. Shape has looked excellent, we have created plenty of chances and their goal was another spawny deflection.

West Ham away is going to be tricky this season. Even if we get a point, i'm more encouraged by us playing well and being unlucky as opposed to lucky wins like the Wolves game
Bingo.