We are an awfully coached team

Jeffthered

Full Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
2,705
Nothing wrong with being a Utd fan who is happy for the win but who knows we were bailed out by a worldie and our keepers first penalty save since he was u9’s! Had we of drawn, people would be glossing over the performance less. Forget possession stats- with your own two eyes- did we dominate West Ham and create genuine chances that should have been converted? Or were we slow and pretty sterile most of the game? I’d say the latter...the point being, with the squad we have, we shouldn’t be relying on late comebacks and individuals saving our ass. Great win- not a great performance by any stretch.
Absolutely. I am surprised some on here seem to suggest that our style of play (lack of...) is not a concern. Today was typical United under OGS.... no flamin' structure, leadership.. just a group of players waiting for something to happen. And, today, it did. If that is a strategy that some are happy with, then fine. But as a fan, I am not, and this is not unique...West Ham were flat, poor, without their main player, and how did we look? Wolves, Young Boys... look at the squad we have? How many players do we need to look a confident, well drilled, coherent team?

Look at City, Liverpool, Chelsea and us, and ask yourself, honestly, whether those teams have a clear identity to their play, which is both suucessful and effective, and ask whether we do.

Are we better than last season? I'm not so sure.
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
I'm saying that those structures and patterns need to be better.
For what? As long as we are scoring freely I don't see any need to call out our attacking coaching as an area that needs drastically improved. There are other things that we can improve but scoring goals is the least of our worries right now. I don't care if we don't put 100 passes for every goal or walk the ball into the goal. As long as we keep scoring at the current rate something we were doing before adding Ronaldo I'm fine with it.

We scored twice at West ham away after being denied a couple of pens and having quite a few chances otherwise. Meanwhile City couldn't come up with a goal at home vs Southampton a team that's lost a couple of their starting defenders. The fact that we have been able to come back to win after going down so many times in last few months actually is a massive compliment to our scoring threat and prowess something that didn't do under the previous managers. Bar the odd game here and there pretty much most games I've watched over the last 12 months I've always felt that we look like scoring anytime in the game and that's what we do. And we've only added to that now. We are going to have a front four this season where all of them can easily score at any given time. City is the only other team in the league that can compare to that.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Yeah Its like a clueless prats version of the socrates method
Buddy, you thought patterns of play were a made up thing only to get pointed to UEFA A License coaching material that explained exactly what they were.

If I lost an argument as definitively as that, I'd probably stop calling others clueless. Being wrong is fine, being obnoxious less so.
 

Jezpeza

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
2,024
Buddy, you thought patterns of play were a made up thing only to get pointed to UEFA A License coaching material that explained exactly what they were.

If I lost an argument as definitively as that, I'd probably stop calling others clueless. Being wrong is fine, being obnoxious less so.
I said the fact we have silly fans who seem to think we dont have them are making it up.

Work on your comprehension of written English pal. You writing 44 paragraphs of guff counts for nothing when its to support an argument that 2+2= garlic bread
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
For what? As long as we are scoring freely I don't see any need to call out our attacking coaching as an area that needs drastically improved. There are other things that we can improve but scoring goals is the least of our worries right now. I don't care if we don't put 100 passes for every goal or walk the ball into the goal. As long as we keep scoring at the current rate something we were doing before adding Ronaldo I'm fine with it.

We scored twice at West ham away after being denied a couple of pens and having quite a few chances otherwise. Meanwhile City couldn't come up with a goal at home vs Southampton a team that's lost a couple of their starting defenders. The fact that we have been able to come back to win after going down so many times in last few months actually is a massive compliment to our scoring threat and prowess something that didn't do under the previous managers. Bar the odd game here and there pretty much most games I've watched over the last 12 months I've always felt that we look like scoring anytime in the game and that's what we do. And we've only added to that now. We are going to have a front four this season where all of them can easily score at any given time. City is the only other team in the league that can compare to that.
As I said, the coaching I'm talking about relates to defence just as much as attack.

So in terms of "for what?", so the passages of play where we struggle to create chances (two shots in half an hour against Young Boys while we had 11 men), or get caught out in transition (the team with the most counter attacks conceded so far this season going into this week, at 6 per match) or have difficulty playing out from the back (as in the Wolves game), or struggle with opposition press (as in the Southampton game) are less frequent. Because improving in those areas will make us a better team.

I mean we haven't won a trophy in quite a while at this point (by our standards). I would have thought the need for us to improve in the areas we are week is pretty apparent. We want to be the best team in the league, don't we?
 

Lemansky

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
970
The brilliant coach and tactician Lars Lagerback was in the Swedish studio. He said that United relies very much on individual brilliance. But what does he know?
Have you ever seen Lars Lagerbacks teams? He is the definition of shit on a stick football. Was having a party when we got rid of him. Negative and pedestrian football.
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,938
Absolutely. I am surprised some on here seem to suggest that our style of play (lack of...) is not a concern. Today was typical United under OGS.... no flamin' structure, leadership.. just a group of players waiting for something to happen. And, today, it did. If that is a strategy that some are happy with, then fine. But as a fan, I am not, and this is not unique...West Ham were flat, poor, without their main player, and how did we look? Wolves, Young Boys... look at the squad we have? How many players do we need to look a confident, well drilled, coherent team?

Look at City, Liverpool, Chelsea and us, and ask yourself, honestly, whether those teams have a clear identity to their play, which is both suucessful and effective, and ask whether we do.

Are we better than last season? I'm not so sure.
oh, for feck's sake - have some perspective. We finished second last year. It is not actually the case that YBB/Wolves is how we REALLY are, while the big, impressive wins are some sort of mirage. It's possible to talk of shortcomings without jumping off a cliff here.
 

Mickson

Full Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Messages
3,738
Location
Vidal's knee
Have you ever seen Lars Lagerbacks teams? He is the definition of shit on a stick football. Was having a party when we got rid of him. Negative and pedestrian football.
I've seen him beat England with Iceland in a TOURNAMENT. Just that should tell you something about his ability. Anyway, he was ace as the Swedish coach too, and from listening to him and seeing his results, he is clearly a very, very good coach, regardless of what you think of his football.
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
As I said, the coaching I'm talking about relates to defence just as much as attack.

So in terms of "for what?", so the passages of play where we struggle to create chances (two shots in half an hour against Young Boys while we had 11 men), or get caught out in transition (the team with the most counter attacks conceded so far this season going into this week, at 6 per match) or have difficulty playing out from the back (as in the Wolves game), or struggle with opposition press (as in the Southampton game) are less frequent. Because improving in those areas will make us a better team.

I mean we haven't won a trophy in quite a while at this point (by our standards). I would have thought the need for us to improve in the areas we are week is pretty apparent. We want to be the best team in the league, don't we?
Yeah for sure and I was pretty much talking about our attack and in particular goalscoring as I saw your example of city scoring goals in a particular pattern. As I said there are things we can improve on but creating chances and scoring goals isn't one of them. It's actually something we are statistically best in the league at, or thereabouts. Talking about the PL that is.
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,414
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
Buddy, you thought patterns of play were a made up thing only to get pointed to UEFA A License coaching material that explained exactly what they were.

If I lost an argument as definitively as that, I'd probably stop calling others clueless. Being wrong is fine, being obnoxious less so.
Point me to the UEFA license material please?
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
I said the fact we have silly fans who seem to think we dont have them are making it up.

Work on your comprehension of written English pal. You writing 44 paragraphs of guff counts for nothing when its to support an argument that 2+2= garlic bread
Your exact words:

I’ve pressed several to explain the meaning of the phrases and theres never been a half decent answer.
Literally if there was an ounce of truth in this guff its a groundbreaking moment for football.
So you didn't think people could explain what they meant by phrases like "patterns of play" and thought if there was any truth in it would be some "groundbreaking moment" for football, yet were simultaneously arguing that we actually have it in our team already.

Forget reading other people's posts before trying to make an argument, try reading your own. You're arguing at cross purposes with yourself.
 

captaincantona

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
1,609
For what? As long as we are scoring freely I don't see any need to call out our attacking coaching as an area that needs drastically improved. There are other things that we can improve but scoring goals is the least of our worries right now. I don't care if we don't put 100 passes for every goal or walk the ball into the goal. As long as we keep scoring at the current rate something we were doing before adding Ronaldo I'm fine with it.

We scored twice at West ham away after being denied a couple of pens and having quite a few chances otherwise. Meanwhile City couldn't come up with a goal at home vs Southampton a team that's lost a couple of their starting defenders. The fact that we have been able to come back to win after going down so many times in last few months actually is a massive compliment to our scoring threat and prowess something that didn't do under the previous managers. Bar the odd game here and there pretty much most games I've watched over the last 12 months I've always felt that we look like scoring anytime in the game and that's what we do. And we've only added to that now. We are going to have a front four this season where all of them can easily score at any given time. City is the only other team in the league that can compare to that.
Scoring freely? Would you stop looking at stats and watch games. We have been shite this season full stop. The Leeds game is the reason you can make your point- we scored 4...that’s bumped up our numbers and so that is somehow a marker for how good we are generally at attacking? Did you watch the other 4 games?

Others talk about being second top scorers last season and point to that as evidence we are good going forward...But in reality, 19 of those 73 goals were scored in 3 games meaning we scored 54 in 35 games. Is that free scoring? What’s worse...on 11 occasions last season Jesse didn’t smash one in the top bin, Bruno didn’t find a killer pass or mason didn’t finish from a fuking impossible angle- and we drew...the point being made is that because we rely so heavily on individuals to produce it inevitably means we come up short to often to challenge for titles. City , Pool, Bayern, Barca, PSG, whoever will have one or two “Southampton “ games a season and go on to win titles by breaking teams down through relentless execution of their coaches tactics..we play slow ponderous shite until someone saves the day. We learned last season how well that works- so looking for a little more craft in our attack doesn’t make us a “genius”...it’s common sense.
 
Last edited:

One Night Only

Prison Bitch #24604
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
30,794
Location
Westworld
This thread can be summed up pretty easy:

Fans are idiots (me included).

We all have our opinions but not one of us is even close to being a premier league manager. All fantasizing we are genius'
 

Harold_Giles

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2005
Messages
1,234
Location
Iceland
I've seen him beat England with Iceland in a TOURNAMENT. Just that should tell you something about his ability. Anyway, he was ace as the Swedish coach too, and from listening to him and seeing his results, he is clearly a very, very good coach, regardless of what you think of his football.
So Lars thinks we rely on individual brilliance. Is that good or bad?
I've heard we rely on VAR, penalties, luck, counter attacks.. the list goes on.
 
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
875
What I mean is that I feel like SAF left a lot of personal responsibility on the players on the pitch to make decisions, whereas Pep and Tuchel seem very focused on positioning, set-up etc.

You've hit the nail on the head though. We played a very simple, but effective brand of football. But it's also worth noting SAF had a brilliant squad at his disposal. Someone always seemed to deliver when it mattered.

One thing I feel we always had was someone who could beat a man. Ronaldo, Giggs, Nani, Valencia to name a few. Having that ability in your team is underrated, especially with today's posession-based game. It's why I feel like we greatly miss Rashford at the moment.
Definitely agree with that last bit. It's why I don't like this combination of Pogba-Greenwood on the wing, need to get Sancho up and running ASAP.

On the point of SAF always having a brilliant squad, I think it was more that our system was so well-drilled that it always amounted to more than the sum of its parts: think back to that 2012/13 season where we had a genuine shot at Chelsea's points record going into April. Young and Valencia were our wingers for much of that season, and they both had crap campaigns individually, but the attack still functioned extremely efficiently. The next season we had the same individuals (Van Persie was admittedly unfit for a lot of it) but looked clueless in a lot of games - exhibit A, Fulham at home.

Think a lot of the frustration with the last few teams under Ole and Mourinho stems from that simple difference: when was the last time it felt like, going forward in particular, we were over-performing relative to the level of talent on the pitch? I don't think it's ever really happened for an extended period.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
I’m no genius but I do like watching football and i think there are two types of fans showing themselves at this point...fans who celebrate a win as a win, no matter how the team plays- and fans who celebrate a win but who look back at the game going

its not as complicated as you lot make it out to be...watch good teams play, City last season, Pool last few years, great Barca sides, Bayern most years, Chelsea currently, there is an inevitability


Scoring freely? Would you stop looking at stats and watch games. We have been shite this season full stop. The Leeds game is the reason you can make your point- we scored 4...that’s bumped up our numbers and so that is somehow a marker for how good we are generally at attacking? Did you watch the other 4 games?

Others talk about being second top scorers last season and point to that as evidence we are good going forward...But in reality, 19 of those 73 goals were scored in 3 games meaning we scored 54 in 35 games. Is that free scoring? What’s worse...on 11 occasions last season Jesse didn’t smash one in the top bin, Bruno didn’t find a killer pass or mason didn’t finish from a fuking impossible angle- and we drew...the point being made is that because we rely so heavily on individuals to produce it inevitably means we come up short to often to challenge for titles. City , Pool, Bayern, Barca, PSG, whoever will have one or two “Southampton “ games a season and go on to win titles by breaking teams down through relentless execution of their coaches tactics..we play slow ponderous shite until someone saves the day. We learned last season how well that works- so looking for a little more craft in our attack doesn’t make us a “genius”...it’s common sense.
What kind of nonsense is this? We were the second top scorers last season, this isn’t a small sample size.
Our goals means less than other goals. If so then what’s the point in fancy patterns of play? Why is it so suddenly easy to score goals?
To recap, we are the top scorers in the league and have conceded 4 goals. 2 of those have been fluke deflections that left the keeper no chance so in real world terms when considering defensive structure, it’s 2 proper goals in 5 games.
We are a mess.
 

MattyLT

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
310
Ok, check out this pattern of play: DDG to Varane to DDG to AWB to Fred to Varane to McTominay to Maguire to Bruno to Pogba to Ronaldo, and BAM! Goal! Just like ping-pong, forward and back again, whilst moving the team forward gradually. I just came up with that myself, on the spot. Just plucked it out of my massive footballing brain like it was nothing. Easy.

Oot!
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Point me to the UEFA license material please?
UEFA A License support material written by a UEFA A License holder and UEFA level 3 "B" tutor.

In case it's what you're setting me up for, please don't try to argue that a UEFA A License holder talking about "patterns of play" as part of UEFA A License support material isn't proof that "patterns of play" are a real thing as part of the A License. I can point to other A License and Pro Diploma holders using the term and concept but, more importantly, I'm tired from long posts already.
 

Jezpeza

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
2,024
Your exact words:





So you didn't think people could explain what they meant by phrases like "patterns of play" and thought if there was any truth in it would be some "groundbreaking moment" for football, yet were simultaneously arguing that we actually have it in our team already.

Forget reading other people's posts before trying to make an argument, try reading your own. You're arguing at cross purposes with yourself.

The arguments about lack patterns of play in relation to oles management are guff yes.

It would be groundbreaking. If this sacred patterns crap was so tantamount then we dont need Ronaldo, just some league 2 players and some genius like you to implement patterns. We will win the lot.

Its not difficult
 

Mickson

Full Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Messages
3,738
Location
Vidal's knee
So Lars thinks we rely on individual brilliance. Is that good or bad?
I've heard we rely on VAR, penalties, luck, counter attacks.. the list goes on.
He didn't put any validation on it. He just called it as he saw it. Called West Ham a very good team and was impressed by Moyes's work there and said that they have a clear idea of how they wanted to play.
 
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
875
I see Jezpeza is still running around calling names and accusing others of "talking guff" after the other guy first engaged with him in good faith with a couple of well-laid-out and perfectly reasonable posts, then realized the kind of blowhard he was dealing with and just slam-dunked him.

Best to stop digging at this point, buddy. You've been comprehensively shown up :lol:
 

Lemansky

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
970
I've seen him beat England with Iceland in a TOURNAMENT. Just that should tell you something about his ability. Anyway, he was ace as the Swedish coach too, and from listening to him and seeing his results, he is clearly a very, very good coach, regardless of what you think of his football.
He is obviously a good coach. But there is not a lot of patterns of play etc that people are banging on about here. He has not won a lot either. I have followed Lagerback both as coach for Sweden and Iceland. But watched all games when he was our coach (Norway) . He is a very, very boring coach. Love block, counters, extremely directional and loves his set pieces (more especially long throws).
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,271
We've only played 5 games this season. 13 goals so far, every one from open play too if memory serves. We've had tap ins, 30 yard screamers & goals from fast counter attacks. We've even had a goal from a delicate short passing routine inside the area. We've had assists from centre-backs and full backs. Even feckin Fred has scored!

I realise there is room for improvement in our attacking play on occasion, but don't we think we might be going a little bit over the top?
 

Mickson

Full Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Messages
3,738
Location
Vidal's knee
He is obviously a good coach. But there is not a lot of patterns of play etc that people are banging on about here. He has not won a lot either. I have followed Lagerback both as coach for Sweden and Iceland. But watched all games when he was our coach (Norway) . He is a very, very boring coach. Love block, counters, extremely directional and loves his set pieces (more especially long throws).
I don't see what his playing style has got to do with this though. I respect his opinion and I think he is very insightful in his comments. I don't like Hodgson's style or Big Sam's but they're clearly knowledgable and good coaches.
 

Abraxas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
6,052
Can't believe Lagerback is some kind of reference point. Let's be honest for the most part Scandinavian teams (at least prior to this Denmark side) bore everybody to tears. Physical, strong, making the best use of their talent certainly - but he's not an authority on how to create the type of football people expect from United. Which if we are being honest is analysed to within an inch of its life, near perfection is expected from some.

He's an authority for setting up drab, stubborn sides. If a pattern of play is setting up a defensive block I'm sure he's an expert but the reality is he's no more credible than any other pundit offering an opinion. It's nice to hear as viewer but shouldn't be treated that seriously.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
The arguments about lack patterns of play in relation to oles management are guff yes.

It would be groundbreaking. If this sacred patterns crap was so tantamount then we dont need Ronaldo, just some league 2 players and some genius like you to implement patterns. We will win the lot.

Its not difficult
No.

Because a lot of other teams have excellent players and that basic concept of coaching. See City winning the league last season and Chelsea winning the champions league. It's already common among top football sides.

I have no idea why you're pretending that we've argued patterns of play would render quality players irrelevant. You're the only person who has imagined that.

It's a particularly odd thing to say when you're arguing that we already have patterns of play in the same post. They can't be a groundbreaking thing that would let us win with League 2 players (as you and only you have imagined) and something we already have in our current team.

For most normal people they're just a standard thing for top sides to coach that help them play better. And we're saying we should do more of that and to a higher level.

Meanwhile you're in your own world flipping between saying people can't give you any definition of it, we already do it and it is the football equivalent of magic.
 
Last edited:

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,401
Location
Berlin
What I mean is that I feel like SAF left a lot of personal responsibility on the players on the pitch to make decisions, whereas Pep and Tuchel seem very focused on positioning, set-up etc.

You've hit the nail on the head though. We played a very simple, but effective brand of football. But it's also worth noting SAF had a brilliant squad at his disposal. Someone always seemed to deliver when it mattered.

One thing I feel we always had was someone who could beat a man. Ronaldo, Giggs, Nani, Valencia to name a few. Having that ability in your team is underrated, especially with today's posession-based game. It's why I feel like we greatly miss Rashford at the moment.
I think, it needs to be noted, that Fergies United was pretty adaptable. Yes it was usually very counter attacking focused and (like todays team) weren't creating too many chances per game in his later years but they were able to switch between countering and possession based, deep block and pressing, could go on to score from set pieces. So these teams had some some stuff up their sleeve to make something work. This is, what we have been lacking a bit last year. Lets see how it pans out this season.

Absolutely. I am surprised some on here seem to suggest that our style of play (lack of...) is not a concern. Today was typical United under OGS.... no flamin' structure, leadership.. just a group of players waiting for something to happen. And, today, it did. If that is a strategy that some are happy with, then fine. But as a fan, I am not, and this is not unique...West Ham were flat, poor, without their main player, and how did we look? Wolves, Young Boys... look at the squad we have? How many players do we need to look a confident, well drilled, coherent team?

Look at City, Liverpool, Chelsea and us, and ask yourself, honestly, whether those teams have a clear identity to their play, which is both suucessful and effective, and ask whether we do.

Are we better than last season? I'm not so sure.
I wouldn't overdo the sceptical stuff for todays match. I mean, we hit the post and we could have got 1 or 2 penalties. While that isn't awesome, it is alright against a tricky opponent trained by Moyes (Mr. Hard-to-Beat). Using this game, it was an improvement on some games last season. At least in my eyes. Plus the subs were pretty brave, taking Pogba off could have easily backfired but it worked out. Stuff like that is good, even it doesn't work out all the time, at least he did something today.

Yeah for sure and I was pretty much talking about our attack and in particular goalscoring as I saw your example of city scoring goals in a particular pattern. As I said there are things we can improve on but creating chances and scoring goals isn't one of them. It's actually something we are statistically best in the league at, or thereabouts. Talking about the PL that is.
I understand your point but one thing to note: while we scored many goals last season, we did so because our forwards have been pretty great. They overperformed on their xG, meaning they scored goals the average player prbably wouldn't have scored. That is to be expected somewhat because our players should be better than the average one. But still, it showed it negative effects as soon as we had to sub people off or went with a fringe-player team.

I agree with you, goal scoring in itself isn't the biggest issue these days. Creating chances can be one. And the stats suggest, that our competitors do it a bit better than we do, which might be an advantage for them. So why shouldn't we try to get something of that as well, if it doesn't work, nobody can take away the individual quality we have.

The arguments about lack patterns of play in relation to oles management are guff yes.

It would be groundbreaking. If this sacred patterns crap was so tantamount then we dont need Ronaldo, just some league 2 players and some genius like you to implement patterns. We will win the lot.

Its not difficult
Joe Sixpack is still arguing with socrates... I respect your bravery. Maybe I try a different angle: You are right, having Ronaldo in the team will help your team regardless of patterns of play. But this pre-drilled moves can help the team even when you don't have such great players than we do. Look at Brighton for example, or last seasons Leeds. These teams aren't stacked with worldclass offensive players but are still able to create good numbers. Nobody wants to take anything away from current United because, as you said, it works to a large degree and that isn't just luck. But adding another layer may even make the team even stronger. I am sure you would agree, that players like Bruno, Ronaldo or Pogba can deal with freedom probably better than players like AWB or McTominay.
 

Womp

idiot
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
9,262
Location
Australia
I'm very critical of him as is well documented, but I think we didn't play too badly today. There were periods where we moved the ball around, retained posession and switched the ball well. Still aspects we need to work on like how slow we move the ball, that we take too many touches, the pressing and the movement, but it was one of our better performances. Not too much to complain about.
 

eire-red

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2018
Messages
2,636
Definitely agree with that last bit. It's why I don't like this combination of Pogba-Greenwood on the wing, need to get Sancho up and running ASAP.

On the point of SAF always having a brilliant squad, I think it was more that our system was so well-drilled that it always amounted to more than the sum of its parts: think back to that 2012/13 season where we had a genuine shot at Chelsea's points record going into April. Young and Valencia were our wingers for much of that season, and they both had crap campaigns individually, but the attack still functioned extremely efficiently. The next season we had the same individuals (Van Persie was admittedly unfit for a lot of it) but looked clueless in a lot of games - exhibit A, Fulham at home.

Think a lot of the frustration with the last few teams under Ole and Mourinho stems from that simple difference: when was the last time it felt like, going forward in particular, we were over-performing relative to the level of talent on the pitch? I don't think it's ever really happened for an extended period.
Yeah that's fair enough, nobody has managed to crack the full potential of the squad since the great man himself.

For the first time in a long time, I'm entertained watching United again, but we could be more dominant. Not a complaint or a problem right now, but I worry come October when we have a run of tough games, and CL in the mix too.

I guess we can't complain too much, especially given our start last season compared to now!
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,575
Supports
Mejbri
We've only played 5 games this season. 13 goals so far, every one from open play too if memory serves. We've had tap ins, 30 yard screamers & goals from fast counter attacks. We've even had a goal from a delicate short passing routine inside the area. We've had assists from centre-backs and full backs. Even feckin Fred has scored!

I realise there is room for improvement in our attacking play on occasion, but don't we think we might be going a little bit over the top?
It's impossible to complain with the points put on the board. And hopefully we'll start to rapidly improve our performances, 3 home games coming up which is just what we need. The performances have been pretty shoddy, no question. Some players (Maguire, AWB) really need to step up, and our midfield needs to improve quite dramatically.

Hopefully that Ramsey guy has a positive effect. Didn't think our corners were at all threatening today. Would really like to see Shaw outside the box and a non-defender take our corners. Just for the sake of our shape in preparation for counters. Really loathe seeing a left back running over to the righthand side to take a corner.
 

Jezpeza

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
2,024
No.

Because a lot of other teams have excellent players and that basic concept of coaching. See City winning the league last season and Chelsea winning the champions league. It's already common among top football sides.

I have no idea why you're pretending that we've argued patterns of play would render quality players irrelevant. You're the only person who has imagined that.

It's a particularly odd thing to say when you're arguing that we already have patterns of play in the same post. They can't be a groundbreaking thing that would let us win with League 2 players (as you and only you have imagined) and something we already have in our current team.
Well youve nailed it there. It is indeed mainly about players. And this is the first season for about a decade that we have a squad that looks good enough.

We have good coaching to go with that squad. We have been very good since operation restart, with the odd bad result such is life. But in terms of coaching and players, So do chelsea liverpool and city. You just seem to think that because paul pogba doesnt do the same feint on a shaw pass 14 times a game as bruno makes run on tangent x, that everything is a puddle of shit. We arent Burnley for goodness sake. We have some of the most creative and intelligent players on the planet and you think we should have an under 10s style of telling everything to every player? Were you in a come when LVG managed us and we did that bollocks?

We do have patterns of play. The argument we dont is just a little buzzword used to bash Ole even when we win.

What i am saying and you fail to understand is that essentially they are worth about as much as a tube of pringles. If patterns were this all important thing it would mean you dont need good players. The argument ‘such and such has better patterns and will guarantee x trophies’ is just arrant nonsense.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Well youve nailed it there. It is indeed mainly about players. And this is the first season for about a decade that we have a squad that looks good enough.

We have good coaching to go with that squad. We have been very good since operation restart, with the odd bad result such is life. But in terms of coaching and players, So do chelsea liverpool and city. You just seem to think that because paul pogba doesnt do the same feint on a shaw pass 14 times a game as bruno makes run on tangent x, that everything is a puddle of shit. We arent Burnley for goodness sake. We have some of the most creative and intelligent players on the planet and you think we should have an under 10s style of telling everything to every player? Were you in a come when LVG managed us and we did that bollocks?

We do have patterns of play. The argument we dont is just a little buzzword used to bash Ole even when we win.

What i am saying and you fail to understand is that essentially they are worth about as much as a tube of pringles. If patterns were this all important thing it would mean you dont need good players. The argument ‘such and such has better patterns and will guarantee x trophies’ is just arrant nonsense.
Again, this is an extreme you and only you are imagining.

Absolutely nobody is arguing that they're some super-powered thing with the ability to rid us of the need for good players. They're not that important and we're not claiming they are.

We're saying they're important enough to potentially be the difference between our already very good team filled with quality players and the absolute best teams in Europe who are also filled with quality players. That's it.

And I'm not even saying we don't have any patterns or structure as is, just that (like our set piece organisation last season) it's something we need to improve on as we're weak in that area compared to our rivals.

It's a pretty reasonable point that shouldn't have started multi-page arguments.
 

Someone

Something
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
7,953
Location
Somewhere
The biggest problem with Ole is that he's yet to win anything at the top level, which will always leave him open to doubts. Personally I love him but felt a lot of times that he hasn't managed games as well as he should've due to his lack of experience, like in the final against Villarreal, and I've seen this happen from time to time as well. Now that we have a top group of players I feel this should be his year but I always have this doubt because he hasn't done it as a manager before. I can't help it, and there's nothing I want more than to see him make it here. It'd be the dream.

Think of last season with Klopp, now any other manager would've been sacked following that horrible run, but because he has a great record it was easier for the fans to stick by him, and this came after one of their greatest seasons in decades. Now if Ole loses few games in a row, the knives will be out from everywhere, including the dressing room, and you can't blame people for that. He needs to earn the reputation of being a top manager who can lead a club like united to success.
 

GOAT 777

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Messages
25
Supports
Portugal, Sporting
Ole is an important part of MUFC's history, the club is not going to sack him in the middle of the season unless the team collapses and I don't see him quitting either.

So I say go for Leonardo Jardim in the end of this season. He's one of the best managers in the world.

My other bet is Paulo Fonseca. He's young, free and has a bright future ahead.

Zidane is worth considering too, he won 3 UCL with CR7 in Madrid and he's also available.

Spoilt for choice.
 
Last edited:

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,414
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
UEFA A License support material written by a UEFA A License holder and UEFA level 3 "B" tutor.

In case it's what you're setting me up for, please don't try to argue that a UEFA A License holder talking about "patterns of play" as part of UEFA A License support material isn't proof that "patterns of play" are a real thing as part of the A License. I can point to other A License and Pro Diploma holders using the term and concept but, more importantly, I'm tired from long posts already.
Eh?

Im bored I just wanted to read something
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,224
Location
Lucilinburhuc
Gary himself said it well, we are not a great team, as in team performance. I would agree. Chelsea are the better team, and over the course of the season, they will amass the most points. We will drop too many the way we play. It isn't sustainable, not when you have Chelsea, Liverpool and City as your opponents, quite simple.

That will reemerge across the season and in the CL. This team well coached, and we would have a good chance.
 

EtH

Full Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,712
Gary himself said it well, we are not a great team, as in team performance. I would agree. Chelsea are the better team, and over the course of the season, they will amass the most points. We will drop too many the way we play. It isn't sustainable, not when you have Chelsea, Liverpool and City as your opponents, quite simple.

That will reemerge across the season and in the CL. This team well coached, and we would have a good chance.
Gary Neville who fancied Kane to give us a better chance at the league than Ronaldo.

I swear this thread is ridiculous.

On a day when Ole was vindicated in his persistence with Lingard in the most dramatic of wins making most here look completely foolish you still have posters bleating on about patterns of play.

Embarrassing. Just enjoy the win.
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,224
Location
Lucilinburhuc
Gary Neville who fancied Kane to give us a better chance at the league than Ronaldo.

I swear this thread is ridiculous.

On a day when Ole was vindicated in his persistence with Lingard in the most dramatic of wins making most here look completely foolish you still have posters bleating on about patterns of play.

Embarrassing. Just enjoy the win.
I have nothing negatively to do with Lingard, hence not making me look foolish.

But our lack of coaching wont go away, even if you wish so.