Earthquake
Pokemon expert
Has Feghouli reached the locker room yet?
Reminds a bit of the Roma/Lazio stadium.Doesnt give a vibe of a PL stadium at all especially with stands being so far from the pitch.
Game on Monday looked like some European away game.
Give Hammers' fans those irritating trumpets and it will be like in Ukraine.
Yeah, not far of, both rectangular in shape.Reminds a bit of the Roma/Lazio stadium.
Have they sorted out the segregation issues between home and away fans yet? I'm down there on Friday for our FA Cup game and looking forward to it.Yeah, but it was relatively isolated pockets from where I was
Yeah, it largely went off without a hitch as far as I was awareHave they sorted out the segregation issues between home and away fans yet? I'm down there on Friday for our FA Cup game and looking forward to it.
The costs include an estimated £8m every year to move supposedly retractable seats, installed to bring football fans closer to the action, off the track to allow athletics every summer.
The original projection was it would take just five days to move the seats at a cost of around £300,000 a-year.
Rather than sliding on the planned hydraulic system however the stands have simply been built on the track, and have to be dismantled and moved by hand in a process that could take up to 30 days in total.
That would eat into the time available for athletics and a planned community and concert programme every summer.
The bill for conversion has risen from £272m to £323m, and the total cost of the stadium to £752m.
Nearly £450,000 of taxpayers' money has been spent trying to find a sponsor for West Ham's London Stadium home but a backer is still being sought.
ThisThat's disgraceful. How dare they spend the tax payers money on a fecking stadium. cnuts
Never move to the US if that makes you angry.That's disgraceful. How dare they spend the tax payers money on a fecking stadium. cnuts
I live in Vegas and the Raiders got $700 million for their new stadium, always thought it was the norm everywhere.Never move to the US if that makes you angry.
Yeah that's easy to assume for those of us here but it seems in the rest of the world they actually assume the sports teams finance the dealio. Shocking concept I know. Taxpayers here just paid about 325 million for the new Detroit Red Wings arena. But hey it cost a mere 870 million or so total so I guess us taxpayers got off cheap.I live in Vegas and the Raiders got $700 million for their new stadium, always thought it was the norm everywhere.
I've read a little bit about the stadium situation in US. Billionaire owners pressuring cities to fork out taxpayer money to replace stadiums which don't need replacing or they threaten to move the "franchise" to another city.Yeah that's easy to assume for those of us here but it seems in the rest of the world they actually assume the sports teams finance the dealio. Shocking concept I know. Taxpayers here just paid about 325 million for the new Detroit Red Wings arena. But hey it cost a mere 870 million or so total so I guess us taxpayers got off cheap.
That's basically exactly what they do - or even if you know there is no way in their right mind they d leave (don't think the Detroit NBA, NFL, MLB and NHL teams made threats like that in any recent times for instance) - then they say they require an incentive to further invest in the city because hey its good for everyone right? Public opinion is sometimes easily swayed by fancy new arenas and stadiums for instance if you say you re also bringing in lodging and entertainment options with it, improving the neighborhood, etc. Often times the plans are so grand that everyone gets starry eyed but in the end you re lucky if anything other than the stadium itself gets built. Mind you - I don't believe that investing in facilities like that can't do good things in the long run for a city or neighborhood but at what cost is it still worth it? Plenty of studies out there that show sports facilities for pro teams have very little net positive impact when you factor in cost to build, the thousands of jobs that it creates during construction but are then gone again and so forth.I've read a little bit about the stadium situation in US. Billionaire owners pressuring cities to fork out taxpayer money to replace stadiums which don't need replacing or they threaten to move the "franchise" to another city.
It's ridiculous.
It isn't. What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas.I live in Vegas and the Raiders got $700 million for their new stadium, always thought it was the norm everywhere.
...didn't he mount the bid for the Olympics?The London Stadium has been a shower since it's inception. The original plan was to turn it in to a 25k Athletics stadium after the Olympics. Problem is almost no athletics events get crowds anywhere near that. Also it didn't have a roof so using for concerts etc wouldn't work either.
The cost of it was originally planned at £250m, it actually cost £429m, the another £323m to convert it to multi use with a roof. It's an awful football stadium as well. Only about 10k seats near the pitch and the rest what seams like miles away.
When the Olympics was planned it should have been built primarily as a football stadium that would temporarily be used for athletics. As soon as the original decision was made to build it primarily for Athletics there was no way it could be easily used for anything else. Not Boris's fault.