RedDevil@84
Full Member
Hopefully we don't rush any of our players. Let them recover completely, be match fit and all.
I disagree. I'm sure the squad have been as injury prone as previous seasons, only this time our lack of quality back-ups are exposing us game after game.Still can't believe how unlucky Ole has been with injuries.
We really need Pogba, Rashfrod and McTominay back. I was also hoping Tuanzebe would take Lindelofs place in the team this season.
Name one team in the Premier league that has had their by far 3 most important outfield players long term injured this season at the same timeInjuries are a fact of life in professional football.
He is no more unlucky than any other manager where it is not unheard of to have 3 players missing.l at any one time.
His problem is lack of adequate squad depth, mainly self inflicted.
He’s probably, in a handful of games, created more chances than all of our midfielders, probably combined, so I don’t agree with you trying to make out he’s no loss at all. You are also using the fact that he’s hardly played this season as some sort of reason in itself that he hasn’t been much of a loss! Because we never had him? That’s the point! He’s contracted to us, we’d be better if we could actually use him.I do understand that.
My point is that United has really only had 3 players missing at the same time.
Pogba has hardly played all season. And when he has, he has made little impact.
McTominay is a loss but recently Matic has come in and played really well.
And of course Rashford is a big loss. No doubt about that.
But to compare them to Keane, Scholes, Yorke and Beckham is nothing like the same.
Please don’t mention Mata and those two flops in the same breath. Mata has been wonderful to this club. At 31 he doesn’t have the pace and endurance, anymore, but he always does his best and he’s always the smartest player on the pitch. In games where we needed his particular style + skills, he’s been good for us, even this season.I was actually thinking more along the lines of Lingard, Pereira, Mata
Name one thing that Lindelof has that Axel hasn't.Has Axel shown anything to suggest that he’s a better option than Lindelöf? Sounds like usual academy bias to me.
Composure on the ball. And more importantly, good performances at centre half at the very highest of levels in the biggest of games. It’s not as simple as everyone who is faster and slightly stronger than Lindelöf is better than him. Going by Axel’s actual performances, there’s a disparity between the player discussed on here and the one on the pitch. The one on the pitch has performed worse than Lindelöf has. That doesn’t mean Lindelöf is the answer either, because I don’t think he is. But not sure what the basis is that Axel Tuanzebe is a better centre half than him. People see what they want. Always happens, until at some point, what they actually see and the actual performances align, and then the criticism of the youth players starts.Name one thing that Lindelof has that Axel hasn't.
Bailly, Rojo, Dalot, Axel, Jones?Its amazing isn't it? Never the bit part players that are out. Always our top guys.
Can't use that against top teams, we will get dominated in midfield.Pogba and Fernandes could be a thing of beauty in a 433 with either Scott, Matic or Fred behind them. We need him back desperately.
Scott and Pogba could be ready for Chelsea if they resume full training next week.Neither Pogba or McT are going to the winter training camp, so the earliest we could see them is likely to be late Feb or early March.
It might be later than that.
Matic should be back from suspension after the break and if he can keep up with his recent good form, the area where we’re most desperately short is the front line. Ighalo coming in should help, but apart from Bruno and Fred, who fills in the gaps?
This.Think our season will be done and dusted before we get most of them back, unfortunately.
We would be the ones doing the dominating in midfield. We would actually have 2 players who can pass the ball for once.Can't use that against top teams, we will get dominated in midfield.
And you think that's all you need to dominate the midfield?We would be the ones doing the dominating in midfield. We would actually have 2 players who can pass the ball for once.
You're telling me it will be any worse than playing Andreas Pereira in central midfield?And you think that's all you need to dominate the midfield?
only issue is we’re not allowed to arrange international friendlies during the break to help give them some playing minutes.
Scott McTominay Knee Injury Jan 10: "Scott's going to be out for a while. We won't see him before the winter break, we'll see him hopefully in February." 23/02/2020 None Ruled Out Track Nemanja Matic Suspended Sending Off - Two Yellow Cards 17/02/2020 None Ruled Out Track Axel Tuanzebe Thigh Injury Hamstring Strain 17/02/2020 None Ruled Out Track Paul Pogba Ankle/Foot Injury Jan 01: "He's injured now and he'll probably need an Op on his foot. We've had a consultant looking at him and the club has done the scans. He'll probably be out for three or four weeks." 17/02/2020 None Ruled Out
I did not say it would be worse than with pereira, that's called a straw man fallacy.You're telling me it will be any worse than playing Andreas Pereira in central midfield?
If Pogba Herrera Matic worked for us so can Pogba Fernandes Matic. It should be even better.
Fernandes is a better football player than Herrera. Also you think we paid 60 million for him to sit on the bench when Pogba's back? You better believe they're going to play together.I did not say it would be worse than with pereira, that's called a straw man fallacy.
Herrera and matic do defensive work and know how to do defensive positioning/reading. So yes it worked, it's a well balanced midfield.
I don't get this when Pogba's back theory.Fernandes ist better football player than Herrera. Also you think we paid 60 million for him to sit on the bench when Pogba's back? You better believe they're going to play together.
Even if it doesn't work against the big teams, that's not where we struggle. We struggle to break down teams who sit back and park the bus. So them two will be perfect to find a way through a packed defence.
How do you figure Pogba won’t play ? Just a small matter of the Euro’s coming up in the summer also.Pogba? Won't play again this season
Mctominay? Conflicting reports
Rashford? April/May
Tuanzebe? Unknown. Was due back weeks ago
He'll get picked no matter what. I don't think he'll play another game for the club.How do you figure Pogba won’t play ? Just a small matter of the Euro’s coming up in the summer also.
Scott and Pogba could be ready for Chelsea if they resume full training next week.
Scott will be strengthening his knee; when he was out injured last time he only needed one full training session before being ready for Spurs.
So I wouldn’t read too much into them not going to the winter training camp.
Hmmm, where are you guys getting this information from? are they even back in light training ? I admire your optimism but think it’ll be some time before either is seen.Reckon Pogba and McTominay will be in the squad for the Chelsea game. Rashford will probably be back after the international break in April. No idea about Axel.
He’ll play by the end of the month.He'll get picked no matter what. I don't think he'll play another game for the club.
In my opinion, yes. BUT even if not, he deserves the chance to show whether he could be Maguire's partner next year as Lindelof definitely shouldn't.Has Axel shown anything to suggest that he’s a better option than Lindelöf? Sounds like usual academy bias to me.
We’re still doing this nonsense I see.He'll get picked no matter what. I don't think he'll play another game for the club.
I’m not sure why Axel deserves anything. Even if Lindelöf is not the answer, we should certainly be going into the market. And even then, I don’t think it’s pressing.In my opinion, yes. BUT even if not, he deserves the chance to show whether he could be Maguire's partner next year as Lindelof definitely shouldn't.
Feels like that is hyping up the guys that do not play much as our saviours.It's unreal how much better we *should* be with Fernandes, Ighalo, McTominay, Pogba, Rashford, Tuanzabe & Matic all in the squad. You could argue they all start when fit, in a diamond formation.
We should expect that team to win the Europa in my opinion.
I'm sure you get my point though.Feels like that is hyping up the guys that do not play much as our saviours.
With Rashford he would lift our attack like he has all season.
The hype there is justified given how many goals he has scored for us and that we have 0 league goals without him.
Bruno and Ighalo are totally unknown in our side so hard to know if we would improve with them.
Bruno should be much better than Lingard and Pereira, but is he better than Pogba as our number 10 and can they play well together?
Tuanzebe is worse than Jones and Bailly in my opinion from what I have watched. Gets hyped by not having played that much.
Matic has done very well recently and Mctominay has been great this season.
Although Fred should play so we might only have room for one of them. Good with more options though so we could rotate.
Pogba in form is amazing, but when it is out of it he can be totally crap. Remember the end of last season and start of this one.
Think our best 11 for big games should be Wan Bissaka, Maguire, Lindelöf, Shaw/williams, Fred, Mctominay, Pogba, Bruno, Rashford, Martial. Ighalo might be better than Martial so we should wait and see with him. I don't think anyone has watched him in China though so we just remember the days at Watford.
Why would a player that did good on loan, and played well in the little he's played for us not deserve the chance to make the spot his own before deciding on whether we should spend 75m on another CB?I’m not sure why Axel deserves anything. Even if Lindelöf is not the answer, we should certainly be going into the market. And even then, I don’t think it’s pressing.
Add to that the fact that Tuanzebe can’t stay fit. As things stand, I’d sell him before Lindelöf. He’s young and British and some team would probably pay £25m-£30m for him, which would of course be unwarranted, but will be considered his price. The teams that would pay such a fee for him are an indication of where he is currently too. It will be a mid-table side.
Again, I don’t think Lindelöf is all that at all and would gladly see him replaced. But with someone better than he is. Just because he isn’t the best doesn’t mean everyone is better than him.
I didn’t say ‘let’s not play him again’ though. That would be weird. As weird as it would be to suddenly say, ‘let’s drop Lindelöf and replace him with a player who has not shown to be as good’.Why would a player that did good on loan, and played well in the little he's played for us not deserve the chance to make the spot his own before deciding on whether we should spend 75m on another CB?
That's just common sense.
Whether or not he does make it his own is irrelevant until he proves he can or can't when the other options is Lindelof who isn't good enough long term.
If as your point states it isn't pressing then it doesn't matter if you give Tuanzabe a try and he gets injured again and you get rid of him, but you at least give him an opportunity after his injury.
What a weird idea to just say 'no, let's not play him again, even if he does turn out good'.
You do realize Herrera and Fernandes play 2 different roles right?Fernandes ist better football player than Herrera. Also you think we paid 60 million for him to sit on the bench when Pogba's back? You better believe they're going to play together.
Even if it doesn't work against the big teams, that's not where we struggle. We struggle to break down teams who sit back and park the bus. So them two will be perfect to find a way through a packed defence.
i know they are two different types of players, Mr. know it all.You do realize Herrera and Fernandes play 2 different roles right?