Chesterlestreet
Man of the crowd
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 19,528
Fluent attacking football isn’t necessarily what I find most pleasing - just saying.
Fluid attacking football can be downright dull too. So, aesthetically pleasing is a relative term. I have always enjoyed watching so-called “negative” sides as much I’ve enjoyed watching champagne football - the key is whether what’s on display is masterfully done or not. My ideal match isn’t two pretty teams playing pretty football - much rather see a clash of styles. The latter is what I find most aesthetically pleasing, if you will.
As for current teams, I’ve no idea. Depends on how good they are on the day. I don’t have any team I particularly enjoy watching for the style alone - to be honest I don’t think we’re in a period right now where truly masterful football is on display. Waiting for the next truly grand team to emerge, to put it like that.
Fluid attacking football can be downright dull too. So, aesthetically pleasing is a relative term. I have always enjoyed watching so-called “negative” sides as much I’ve enjoyed watching champagne football - the key is whether what’s on display is masterfully done or not. My ideal match isn’t two pretty teams playing pretty football - much rather see a clash of styles. The latter is what I find most aesthetically pleasing, if you will.
As for current teams, I’ve no idea. Depends on how good they are on the day. I don’t have any team I particularly enjoy watching for the style alone - to be honest I don’t think we’re in a period right now where truly masterful football is on display. Waiting for the next truly grand team to emerge, to put it like that.