Awwwww!something about Plan M being a wanker and we all love you too much not to let it go unpunished mate!
He was banned for that thread?! Harsh.
Even if he made 100 outrageous posts it was still the wrong decision.
Even if he made 100 outrageous posts it was still the wrong decision.
I agree...a slight annoyance isn't banning material, otherwise this place would be pretty empty...He was banned for that thread?! Harsh.
no he was banned because he asked if we could play the sexual abuse game, i said no and he thought i was playing...He was banned for that thread?! Harsh.
meh. It's not the first time he has started a thread about not posting.He was banned for that thread?! Harsh.
I don't even know who Scholesy is, but I think the issue of banning does concern the whole forum, especially when it appears to be an unfair banning.Who cares?
Probably because mods were annoyed with his attention seeking, Top said something about it yesterday in the thread.
I don't feel all that concerned.I don't even know who Scholesy is, but I think the issue of banning does concern the whole forum, especially when it appears to be an unfair banning.
Well actually, if we're getting into the technicalities, then in the words of Scholsey himself, everyone here is to blame for bullying him off the forum.I'll stand up for someone, whether I like them or not, if I think they've been treated badly
He's not my cup of tea, but if offering an opinion is enough to get you banned on here, what's the point? Some won't be happy until its been turned to the blandest most uninteresting place possible
I remember a time when folk were banned for being proper proper dickheads, and not just have them dished out like confetti for little to no reason
There's also doubt about whether or not he's a WUM among us mods, and it's probably the only reason he hasn't been perm banned yet.I'm not sure he does post just to wind folk up and take the piss
Agreed.I'm not sure he does post just to wind folk up and take the piss
I think he's from the Rubberman mould
Deeply passionate in his opinions, which just happen to be utter and complete tripe
I don't know much about Scholesy's case, I'm just making a general point. There sometimes seems to be a reluctance by the mods to discuss bannings, as if they're not in the forum's interest. I think they probably are.I don't feel all that concerned.
A poster who only posts on the caf to wind people up and take the piss, gets mysteriously banned AFTER claiming he's going to stop posting here anyway.
Is it even possible to find something more pointless to be concerned about?
You give him too much credit.He requested it to revise for his 11-plus.
Literally everytime anyone is banned, there ends up being a multiple page thread in here in which the banning ends up being explained in grave detail about 50 times over, while a bunch of people whinge about it, even if the ban is for repeatedly aggresive Nazi sympathysing.I don't know much about Scholesy's case, I'm just making a general point. There sometimes seems to be a reluctance by the mods to discuss bannings, as if they're not in the forum's interest. I think they probably are.
If the modmins at some point unanimously feel that you only come on here to wind people up, then you will probably get banned, yeah. As is the case with all wums.A couple of years ago I called Wibble a cnut. I guess I can be expecting a ban sometime next week eh
Probably because mods were annoyed with his attention seeking, Top said something about it yesterday in the thread.
It definitely doesn't work talking about it, see nani nanas banning.I don't know much about Scholesy's case, I'm just making a general point. There sometimes seems to be a reluctance by the mods to discuss bannings, as if they're not in the forum's interest. I think they probably are.
I swear he's made about 4 threads on exactly the same subject, he complains about people not debating with him but when i've tried to start a debate with him he ignores it.
We have answered pretty much all threads like this for a while now.I don't know much about Scholesy's case, I'm just making a general point. There sometimes seems to be a reluctance by the mods to discuss bannings, as if they're not in the forum's interest. I think they probably are.