He hasn't made the semis the last two years. But there are no players as good as Berdych or Tsonga in his quarter. Gilles Simon may be his toughest match. But he's one of those top twenty players who generally folds as soon as Nadal and Federer are on the other side of the net.So why is the draw favorable to Federer? He'd probably make the semis regardless of the draw. And then make loads unforced errors and crash out
I know he hasn't. But I expect him to. He's better this year than last year. Still won't it sadly.He hasn't made the semis the last two years. But there are no players as good as Berdych or Tsonga in his quarter. Gilles Simon may be his toughest match. But he's one of those top twenty players who generally folds as soon as Nadal and Federer are on the other side of the net.
Sampras won a GS after numerous loses to the likes of Safin, Roddick and Hewwit.Once players reach 30 they never get better. And his results at Roland Garros against Djokovic kind of confirm his regression.
I think he has at least one more Grandslam in him. Could be any of Wimbledon, Us Open or Australian Open but the key part of his game is his serve. If he can get that back to it's best, there's no reason he can be a threat in a GS. As he gets older, he's going to struggle more in the longer rallies and the best way to keep the point short is to get a nice big first serve in. His serve is as it is hard enough to read. At his peak, it was absolutely brilliant. But he's struggling big time to get a decent first serve percentage these days.I think Fed is capable of winning Wimbledon. But if he doesn't do it this year, it won't happen at all.
Top game in terms of the best he can be today or the best Federer has to offer in general?He just needs Nadal and Djokovic to have an off day and he'll need to be on his top game to defeat them.
In terms of whatever he has left in his game. He'll never be able to roll back the years, so asking him to do it twice against Nadal and Djokovic in consecutive games would be impossibleTop game in terms of the best he can be today or the best Federer has to offer in general?
On grass I would say yes.Fed's declining rapidly but I'd still say he's a level above Murray/Del Po/Tsonga.
He can face Tsonga in the QFs. Will have to play well to beat himNadal gets a bye to the final again.
Fed's declining rapidly but I'd still say he's a level above Murray/Del Po/Tsonga.
That's nonsense. Federer would be the favorite for Wimbledon at his peak.In terms of whatever he has left in his game. He'll never be able to roll back the years, so asking him to do it twice against Nadal and Djokovic in consecutive games would be impossible
Ironically though, I reckon his current self has more chance to win as compared to him in his peak. He loves playing long rallies in the past, which would play right into Djokovic and Nadal's game as they're amongst the fittest players on the tour and can run for 5 sets if needed. He knows he's no longer able to run as much as he used to now, so he's trying to end rallies much quicker, which in theory would work, if it weren't for him screwing up his service game so often lately.
Not if he faces Nadal.That's nonsense. Federer would be the favorite for Wimbledon at his peak.
It's a 2-1 record in Federer's favor at Wimbledon. And his peak was arguably 03-07. He'd easily be favorite at Wimbledon at his peak. Two guys with 3 Wimbledon's between them certainly wouldn't.Not if he faces Nadal.
The only Wimbledon final Federer won against Nadal, he was second best for me.It's a 2-1 record in Federer's favor at Wimbledon. And his peak was arguably 03-07. He'd easily be favorite at Wimbledon at his peak. Two guys with 3 Wimbledon's between them certainly wouldn't.
He won two!?The only Wimbledon final Federer won against Nadal, he was second best for me.
Federer's experienced helped him to close it out. But for me Nadal was better. Also IIRC Nadal got an unfortunate niggling injury in the fifth.He won two!?
Disagree. He was better IMO. And performed big time in the deciding 5th set.
Considering all the free points Fed got on his serve Nadal was much the better player in the last two they played.He won two!?
Disagree. He was better IMO. And performed big time in the deciding 5th set.
Agree to disagree.Federer's experienced helped him to close it out. But for me Nadal was better. Also IIRC Nadal got an unfortunate niggling injury in the fifth.
Regardless, IIRC Nadal had not even won a tournament on grass by then but still pushed Fed to the brink. Then finished the job next year. I don't think Fed being fav on Wimbledon would be that cert if he had to face Novak and Nadal in their prime.
Right, so who got those free points for Federer on his serve? Federer himself, possibly?Considering all the free points Fed got on his serve Nadal was much the better player in the last two they played.
It might be a 2-1 advantage, but if they both make it to the finals, Nadal will be favorite and rightly so. He's the better player right now on all surfaces besides indoor hardcourts.It's a 2-1 record in Federer's favor at Wimbledon. And his peak was arguably 03-07. He'd easily be favorite at Wimbledon at his peak. Two guys with 3 Wimbledon's between them certainly wouldn't.
Like I mentioned, I feel Federer's game at his peak plays directly into Nadal and Djokovic's game. Federer used to be able to draw out the rallies to force opponents to make mistakes when they tire. This won't work against the two as they are good enough to take sets off Federer and being able to outrun him. Federer's best chance against the both of them was always to complete the game in as few sets as possible, which is what his current game is based on, trying to end rallies as quickly as possible to make up for his loss in overall fitness.It's a 2-1 record in Federer's favor at Wimbledon. And his peak was arguably 03-07. He'd easily be favorite at Wimbledon at his peak. Two guys with 3 Wimbledon's between them certainly wouldn't.
Because he's so overwhelming at his peak that not many players even gets a chance to play 5 sets with him, and when it's a 5 set game, it's mostly down to fitness and that's one aspect which Federer has dropped off in recent years mainly due to age.It might be a 2-1 advantage, but if they both make it to the finals, Nadal will be favorite and rightly so. He's the better player right now on all surfaces besides indoor hardcourts.
Also, random thought, but for a player of his calibre, Federer's 5set win-loss ratio is very underwhelming. Wonder why
It was also his peak. What was he supposed to do?Federer's greatness is overrated - he won 12 of 16 titles in a 4 year period when he had no serious competition (before Nadal or Novak were even 22 yrs old).
Who is talking about right now? Federer is well behind Nadal and even further behind Djokovic today.It might be a 2-1 advantage, but if they both make it to the finals, Nadal will be favorite and rightly so. He's the better player right now on all surfaces besides indoor hardcourts.
Also, random thought, but for a player of his calibre, Federer's 5set win-loss ratio is very underwhelming. Wonder why