Wimbledon 2013

Murray played a great game today, there is not doubt about it at all. He used the crowd to inspire him, and he took every opportunity given to him, there was no other winner.

But... To me, he will never be a Brit. He is, and always will be, Scottish. Not that I have anything against the Scottish, it is that he does not associate himself with being British, but rather with being Scottish. His statements from before where he claimed to be purely Scottish at a younger age don't just leave like that: he was most probably told by a PR agent to change his stance about his views, and that going down his Proud Scottish heritage will not win over the fans at Wimbledon. I am now at that age of which he had first made those statements, and a lot of people blame him doing that due to his naivety at that age (21 years old). That is a complete load of bollocks too; he is just as mature in terms of intelligence and decision making as he is now, and saying those sort of things cannot be excused from. This was what I wanted to say to all those people who don't "understand" all those Murray haters, and I hope my explanation covered all the feelings of those people as well as possible opinions towards his demeanor and attitude on court which can be off putting too.

He fully deserved this final. He made so few errors, won all those passing shots and fed off the crowd. But to me, he will always be a Scot in his heart, and he won this for Scotland, not for Britain.

Rant over.

He won it for himself and rightly so.
 
What was so disrespectful?

Can't believe we are taking about a hostile crowd when we are all supposed football fans.

I said already - cheering during a point. Cheering double points. Booing Djokovic for remonstrating with an umpire when Murray has done the same (and more) in the past without a peep from the crowd. I understand supporting your player, but like I keep on saying there is a line between what is acceptable and what is not. Be as loud as as intimidating as you want, but at the appropriate times.

Comparisons to football also shouldn't be made, it's a completely different environment.
 
Murray played a great game today, there is not doubt about it at all. He used the crowd to inspire him, and he took every opportunity given to him, there was no other winner.

But... To me, he will never be a Brit. He is, and always will be, Scottish. Not that I have anything against the Scottish, it is that he does not associate himself with being British, but rather with being Scottish. His statements from before where he claimed to be purely Scottish at a younger age don't just leave like that: he was most probably told by a PR agent to change his stance about his views, and that going down his Proud Scottish heritage will not win over the fans at Wimbledon. I am now at that age of which he had first made those statements, and a lot of people blame him doing that due to his naivety at that age (21 years old). That is a complete load of bollocks too; he is just as mature in terms of intelligence and decision making as he is now, and saying those sort of things cannot be excused from. This was what I wanted to say to all those people who don't "understand" all those Murray haters, and I hope my explanation covered all the feelings of those people as well as possible opinions towards his demeanor and attitude on court which can be off putting too.

He fully deserved this final. He made so few errors, won all those passing shots and fed off the crowd. But to me, he will always be a Scot in his heart, and he won this for Scotland, not for Britain.

Rant over.


Doesn't really explain or justify why someone would "hate" him.
 
So you Brits hate Murray because he prefers to be referred to as Scottish? That explains a lot.
 
Murray played a great game today, there is not doubt about it at all. He used the crowd to inspire him, and he took every opportunity given to him, there was no other winner.

But... To me, he will never be a Brit. He is, and always will be, Scottish. Not that I have anything against the Scottish, it is that he does not associate himself with being British, but rather with being Scottish. His statements from before where he claimed to be purely Scottish at a younger age don't just leave like that: he was most probably told by a PR agent to change his stance about his views, and that going down his Proud Scottish heritage will not win over the fans at Wimbledon. I am now at that age of which he had first made those statements, and a lot of people blame him doing that due to his naivety at that age (21 years old). That is a complete load of bollocks too; he is just as mature in terms of intelligence and decision making as he is now, and saying those sort of things cannot be excused from. This was what I wanted to say to all those people who don't "understand" all those Murray haters, and I hope my explanation covered all the feelings of those people as well as possible opinions towards his demeanor and attitude on court which can be off putting too.

He fully deserved this final. He made so few errors, won all those passing shots and fed off the crowd. But to me, he will always be a Scot in his heart, and he won this for Scotland, not for Britain.

Rant over.


Actually he won it for himself. His nationality is irrelevant. Just nice to see the lad succeed when it's clear how much hard work he's put into his game.
 
Such a great thing to see him end that 77 year wait. But it's also extremely sweet to taste the tears of the bitter little lemons who were desperate for him to fail :D

in a relatively short space of time, olympic gold, US open Champion, Wimbledon champions.
 
Doesn't really explain or justify why someone would "hate" him.


Hate is a strong word I wouldn't use for 99.999999% of the world, so maybe "dislike" would be a better word. But "dislikers" isn't the same as "haters" is it?

Actually he won it for himself. His nationality is irrelevant. Just nice to see the lad succeed when it's clear how much hard work he's put into his game.


He did, as does most sportsmen. But all those fans celebrated this win like a British victory, which everyone should be proud of. I was pointing out why some British fans may not see the same way.
 
So you Brits hate Murray because he prefers to be referred to as Scottish? That explains a lot.

Only a small minority I'd say. And the little Englanders can be precious when someone doesn't support "Ingurland".

I wasn't a big fan of Murray's till the amount of underserved hate he got. He deserves this win
 
I give credit to Murray, the desire and the will to win was incredible today.

That said Djokovic was pretty abysmal. He made over 40 unforced errors and many times he let Murry back into the point. He couldn't close the point, yes a lot of that is Murray's determination to stay in the point but normally Djokovic puts those winners away all the time.

Murray should enjoy the celebrations they are deserved. Djokovic will be back, he is still the better player IMO and on another day it would have been different.
 
I can't believe that the slimeball Alex Salmond tried to politicize Murray's victory by unfurling a Scottish flag in the VIP box.

Cameron: "Oh put that away Alec. Here, drink some Pimm's and smile at the cameras."

Poor Ed is missing out on a bloody good photo op right now.
 
Nationality shouldn't matter. He's not representing a team or a country specifically (unlike the Davis Cup). He's representing himself and himself only. It just so happens that he's a Scottish/British player. Support him because you like him or you like his tennis, because his nationality doesn't matter at all. It's why I'm completely amoral towards him - I far, far prefer Hewitt, Del Potro or Tsonga. But I don't dislike him like I do Federer or Safin.
 
So you Brits hate Murray because he prefers to be referred to as Scottish? That explains a lot.

A few retarded English people dislike Murray, most of whom it appears live in this thread. The vast majority of the country loves him and is ecstatic at his victory.
 
Fair play to him, to beat Djoko in three sets is an astonishing achievement.

Well deserved winner.
 
Murray played a great game today, there is not doubt about it at all. He used the crowd to inspire him, and he took every opportunity given to him, there was no other winner.

But... To me, he will never be a Brit. He is, and always will be, Scottish. Not that I have anything against the Scottish, it is that he does not associate himself with being British, but rather with being Scottish. His statements from before where he claimed to be purely Scottish at a younger age don't just leave like that: he was most probably told by a PR agent to change his stance about his views, and that going down his Proud Scottish heritage will not win over the fans at Wimbledon. I am now at that age of which he had first made those statements, and a lot of people blame him doing that due to his naivety at that age (21 years old). That is a complete load of bollocks too; he is just as mature in terms of intelligence and decision making as he is now, and saying those sort of things cannot be excused from. This was what I wanted to say to all those people who don't "understand" all those Murray haters, and I hope my explanation covered all the feelings of those people as well as possible opinions towards his demeanor and attitude on court which can be off putting too.

He fully deserved this final. He made so few errors, won all those passing shots and fed off the crowd. But to me, he will always be a Scot in his heart, and he won this for Scotland, not for Britain.

Rant over.
:lol:

Why would he need to be excused from being proud of his heritage?! If the English fans want to cheer on a Scotsman that's their business, it's not something he should try and hide just so they can find it a bit easier to get on board. Don't think Murray played that well today to be honest. It says a lot that he can be below-par and still beat the World #1 of course, I'm not taking anything away from his achievement, I just thought the main thing to take out of that game was Djokovic simply didn't play well enough to win a final. It really wasn't a great game of tennis.
 
As for the match itself, nothing should be taken away from Murray. Djokovic was far from his best and made many unforced errors, but Murray played some excellent tennis as well. Some of his shot selection was superb and he made some very, very good winners.

The quality of the match was overall, fairly good. It won't go down as a classic since Murray won in straight sets, however up until then, despite the long rallies there were some very good ones and some excellent points. The number of breaks made it exciting for me. Djokovic's first serve was weak, while Murray's second serve was still showing to be a weakness of his. When you've got two great returners playing each other, a weak serve is always going to mean lots of breaks.

Murray's mental strength was very strong. On other occasions he'd have crumbled when throwing away a break lead or going a break down, but he just wouldn't give up here. Even when he bottled it himself, he just constantly found ways back into it. Djokovic's mental attitude was strange. He seemed to throw it away at points of the match where he was in complete control, and found it again when he was down and out.

No one can take that away from Murray though; no one. The crowd weren't great but they cheered before points were won at times which equally affected Murray sometimes. The long match excuse can't be used for Djokovic as he's a machine of a player and isn't generally fatigued by long matches. And as I say, despite Djokovic being poor, Murray still played some very good tennis and deserved his win. Incredible scenes and I'm delighted for him.
 
Wimbledon champion and Olympic gold medallist, I'd say so. I'd also hope he doesnt get it this year, but at the end of his career to celebrate ALL his achievements rather than being overly reactionary to give it to him this year

4 slam finals and 2 wins, and yet still people choose to say he didnt deserve it or he's not good enough :rolleyes:
 
Delighted for Murray, thoroughly deserved to win. Yes he's competing individually, but he's British as well as being Scottish. He won a Gold medal for Britain and ended the wait for a British player to win Wimbledon in his home country.
 
I'd have loved it if it all kicked off in the royal box, Cameron throwing a right hook right into Salmond's squishy face
 
Not sure he will go on to dominate. But he will be certainly in contention in every slam for years.

I look forward to more matches with Murray and Djok
 
What is wrong with the crowd at the French Open?

Personally, I don't have a clue why tennis is a silent sport. Golf yes, tennis no. I'm not suggesting singing but people getting irate about the audience's excitement just seems pathetic to me. The reason why you get people shouting out is because they're restrained in an arena of really high pressure for hours at a time. Imagine having to be quiet in a football match.