Feed Me
I'm hungry
How much have they spent on Carroll, Suarez and Henderson combined?
You think you're getting anywhere near £16m for Aquilani?If we assume the Henderson deal is 13mil or so plus Ngog, and Aquilani is sold to an Italian club, our transfer net spend is still around 0 for the FSG transfer windows.
INS (approximations obviously):You think you're getting anywhere near £16m for Aquilani?
Is that a good or bad thing you think? I mean once again it looks like your owners don't really use cash from their own pocket to sign players.Alright then, our net spend will be around £3m.
Which means your new Yanks are looking to fund transfers by selling first very much like ours.Alright then, our net spend will be around £3m.
Well Juve have said they won't go over £7m at the moment, so it's looking like you either keep him, or flog him on the cheapEdit: I thought your post said £21m? Anyway, yeah I reckon Aquilani will go for a bit less than 16m. I'd predict the fee to be between 11-14m.
It did I forgot BabelEdit: I thought your post said £21m? Anyway, yeah I reckon Aquilani will go for a bit less than 16m. I'd predict the fee to be between 11-14m.
I saw a couple reports suggesting it so went with it. I'm not pretending that I know for sure.Where is this £13m fee for Henderson coming from? Genuine question, as all I've seen is £20m which may or may not include N'Gog - and there's no way N'Gog is valued at £7m
Or sell him to another club. He's only 26 and came off a decent year, according to those keeping up with him. I don't think over 10m is unlikely.Well Juve have said they won't go over £7m at the moment, so it's looking like you either keep him, or flog him on the cheap
Is that a good or bad thing you think? I mean once again it looks like your owners don't really use cash from their own pocket to sign players.
Which means your new Yanks are looking to fund transfers by selling first very much like ours.
You are in a better position debt wise and strategy wise though in that your new yanks have cleared the debts and are letting the manager do his thing.
Even assuming Kenny does put together a very good Liverpool side you may find it will still come at the wrong time in terms of City's gradual climb to buying the premier league and Abramovich's return to spending after a long run of being more thrifty. And of course, you can never rule out any United side under Sir Alex.
Kenny's first big challenge is to see if he can use the lack of European football to his advantage in the league and, oddly enough, I'd say next season may well be his best chance of having a pop at the title as once you are back in the CL I really don't think you'll have the squad to compete on all fronts.
It's alright, I tracked it down, it's the Telegraph's story by Rory Smith. He's the NW football correspondent with a lot of links to LFC so he's a decent source.I saw a couple reports suggesting it so went with it. I'm not pretending that I know for sure.
I think this is a good shout. Missing out on Europa will possibly turn out to be a blessing (Kenny was successful at Liverpool domestically as a manager when the club was banned from Europe), and the aim has to be top 4 next season, which will not be an easy task.Which means your new Yanks are looking to fund transfers by selling first very much like ours.
You are in a better position debt wise and strategy wise though in that your new yanks have cleared the debts and are letting the manager do his thing.
Even assuming Kenny does put together a very good Liverpool side you may find it will still come at the wrong time in terms of City's gradual climb to buying the premier league and Abramovich's return to spending after a long run of being more thrifty. And of course, you can never rule out any United side under Sir Alex.
Kenny's first big challenge is to see if he can use the lack of European football to his advantage in the league and, oddly enough, I'd say next season may well be his best chance of having a pop at the title as once you are back in the CL I really don't think you'll have the squad to compete on all fronts.
I think both players will do well at their respective teams.Its just aswell, now we wont be signing Henderson.
If only they stepped up their Ashley Young bid.......
Decent may get you a Top 4 challenge.Add Phil Jones to the list! They'll have a pretty decent squad to be honest.
The Times. And tony barret is without a doubt the most credible liverpool reporter out there these days.Where is this £13m fee for Henderson coming from? Genuine question, as all I've seen is £20m which may or may not include N'Gog - and there's no way N'Gog is valued at £7m
And yet you will still have a higher net spend than us, and still bemoan our lavish spending as the reason for our success.Alright then, our net spend will be around £3m.
Add Phil Jones to the list! They'll have a pretty decent squad to be honest.
Or dontAdd Phil Jones to the list! They'll have a pretty decent squad to be honest.
It matters not what NGog is valued at, it is the cash amount which is important. If it is £13m cash then Sunderland will want NGog to be valued at 6-7m to get close to a figure they have valued him at. They can value him for whatever they like as far as I care.But I still think £7m is over-valuing N'Gog
INS (approximations obviously):
£22m Suarez
£35m Carrol
£13m Henderson
Total = 70m
OUTS:
£50m Torres
£7m Babel
(Leverage) Ngog
£13m Aquilani
Total = 70m
Edit: I thought your post said £21m? Anyway, yeah I reckon Aquilani will go for a bit less than 16m. I'd predict the fee to be between 11-14m.
and will he not have been?Meh, they'll just put up another trump card that N'gog was sold for profit,