Man City sell COMS naming rights to Etihad

Sir Matt

Blue Devil
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
18,341
Location
LUHG
Manchester City Said to Have Sold Stadium Name to Abu Dhabi’s Etihad Air
By Tariq Panja - Jul 7, 2011
Manchester City, the English soccer club owned by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan of Abu Dhabi, will sign the richest sponsorship agreement in its history with Etihad Airways, the Gulf state’s government-owned airline, according to two people familiar with the transaction.

Etihad, which pays 2.3 million pounds ($3.7 million) a year as the team’s shirt sponsor, will get naming rights for the City of Manchester Stadium, said the people, who declined to be identified because the deal hasn’t been publicly announced. They declined to reveal the terms of the contract, which will be announced soon. Etihad and City declined to comment.

Mansour has spent almost $1 billion since acquiring City in September 2008. He’s bought international players including Carlos Tevez and David Silva in an effort to win trophies and outpace rival cross-town rival Manchester United, which last season won a record 19th English championship. City qualified for the Champions League and won the F.A. Cup last season, its first major trophy since 1976.

City has been trying to increase its revenue in an effort to meet new criteria on fiscal responsibility established by European soccer’s governing body, UEFA. Under those rules, clubs that can’t keep costs and income at an acceptable level face being banned from the Champions League, Europe’s elite competition. City’s accounts for the year ended May 31, 2010, show it lost 121.3 million pounds, 31 percent more than a year earlier.

‘Financial Fair Play’

“There’s a sense, but UEFA will say it’s not the case of course, that financial fair play is aimed at clubs like Manchester City and Chelsea who have wealthy benefactors,” said Stefan Szymanski, a professor of sports business at London’s Cass Business School. “If this sponsorship deal were not to be a fair value deal Manchester City would be caught out, but I don’t believe that’s the case.”

UEFA will allow teams to incur losses for infrastructure and youth development. Its General Secretary Gianni Infantino said the Nyon, Switzerland-based organization will monitor sponsorship deals to ensure agreements are based on fair value.

Infantino was responding to concerns that wealthy benefactors could use sponsorship deals to inflate the balance sheets of teams they own. Mansour is a member of the Abu Dhabi royal family.

In last year’s results Manchester City said revenue from sponsors and partners grew 400 percent to 32.4 million pounds because of agreements with Abu Dhabi-based companies including telecommunication company Etisalat, Aaabar Investments PJSC, the Abu Dhabi Tourism Authority and Etihad.

City moved to the City of Manchester stadium from its Maine Road ground in 2003. In October it re-negotiated with Manchester City Council to allow it to sell naming rights.

To contact the reporter on this story: Tariq Panja in London at tpanja@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Christopher Elser at celser@bloomberg.net

Manchester City Said to Have Sold Stadium Name to Abu Dhabi
That's fair...sponsoring yourself. :lol:
 

Feeky Magee

keen violinist
Joined
Oct 13, 2010
Messages
9,004
Early test of the FFP if it's anything above decent market value. Funny stuff though, given Etihad loosely translates to United.
 

Sir Matt

Blue Devil
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
18,341
Location
LUHG
From Twitter: Manchester City's other Abu Dhabi based sponsors: Aabar Investments, Abu Dhabi Tourism Authority, Etisalat, Ferrostaal


I know they're the shirt sponsor too, but the whole idea is ridiculous.
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
23,131
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
Reckon it's about 10 million py. Nothing massive, but a little help. City need to do a lot more to stop worrying about FFP.
 

Rood

nostradamus like gloater
Scout
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
21,411
Location
@United_Hour
there is nothing wrong with this deal in principle - depends how much it is for though
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2006
Messages
14,829
there is nothing wrong with this deal in principle - depends how much it is for though
Exactly.

Their deal should be comparable to Arsenal's imo, maybe a bit more as the market is higher than when Arsenal signed theirs
 

RedRover

Full Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
8,982
This was always going to happen, though.
All irrelevant anyway.

Something struck me the other day - regardless of how clubs behave will UEFA throw the likes of City, Chelsea or Real Madrid, with some of the world's best players out of their flagship competition.

No chance. The sponsors would go mad.
 

Feeky Magee

keen violinist
Joined
Oct 13, 2010
Messages
9,004
Exactly.

Their deal should be comparable to Arsenal's imo, maybe a bit more as the market is higher than when Arsenal signed theirs
I would say less, given their stadium was called the Emirates from the get-go, hence that's what everyone refers to it as. With this, I suspect most will continue to call it COMS/Eastlands.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2006
Messages
14,829
I would say less, given their stadium was called the Emirates from the get-go, hence that's what everyone refers to it as. With this, I suspect most will continue to call it COMS/Eastlands.
Fair point, I guess that is balanced out by how much more the sponsorship world is worth now, plus City will be trying to buy the names that sponsors will want to see wearing the shirt

Seems Arsenal's deal was worth ~£100m over about 15yrs, but I suspect it rises like our Nike deal appears to

From what I can tell, I think there deal brings in about £9m/season for shirt and stadium, divided into £3m for stadium, and according to today's Times £6m for the shirt
 

SteveJ

all-round nice guy, aka Uncle Joe Kardashian
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
62,851
Was this deal sealed by Sheikh Mansour with a sock over his hand?


Mansour: "Hello, Sheikh Mansour. I'd like to sponsor your stadium for eleventy-billion quid."

Mansour: "That's very generous of you, Sheikh Mansour. Would you like to buy Gareth Barry too?"

Mansour: "F**k right off. I may be a sock but I'm not bloody stupid."
 

kafta

Perpetual Under 11's Team Player
Joined
Sep 29, 2004
Messages
5,634
Location
Beirut
Etihad is the Arabic word for United. Scum.
 

JazzG

Resident Arse.
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
2,682
eleventy?

Fair point, I guess that is balanced out by how much more the sponsorship world is worth now, plus City will be trying to buy the names that sponsors will want to see wearing the shirt

Seems Arsenal's deal was worth ~£100m over about 15yrs, but I suspect it rises like our Nike deal appears to

From what I can tell, I think there deal brings in about £9m/season for shirt and stadium, divided into £3m for stadium, and according to today's Times £6m for the shirt
Our deal isn't really a fair indicator for market value, a lot of our money was front loaded so a lot of the money was paid upfront to pay for the stadium.
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
87,266
So it will be called the Etihad Stadium?

Another nail in the coffin of football.
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
23,131
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
Love it. I love that this is happening to be honest.

There stadium is now the Etihad stadium.

The long serving Man City fans must go to the Etihad Stadium, look at players like Tevez and Boetang complaining constantly, look up to see their massive "thank you Sheikh Mansour" sign and feel utterly utterly embarassed!
 

mufcwarm92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
5,744
Location
W3103
City as a club have become a real embarrassment, here is another nail in the overpriced, overpaid, success-free City coffin.
 

Neutral

BTV
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
11,619
Location
DC/Canberra/Dhaka
City as a club have become a real embarrassment, here is another nail in the overpriced, overpaid, success-free City coffin.
Not sure I'd have a go at them, do we have concrete guarantees our owners won't do the same in the future?

10 year naming right for a cool 150-200mil doesn't sound like something the Glazers would turn their noses up at. What the fans would think of such a move wouldn't matter one iota to them.

Boycotts you say, sure 1 weekend, possibly 2, and then everyone moves on.
 

Rood

nostradamus like gloater
Scout
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
21,411
Location
@United_Hour
Not sure I'd have a go at them, do we have concrete guarantees our owners won't do the same in the future?

10 year naming right for a cool 150-200mil doesn't sound like something the Glazers would turn their noses up at. What the fans would think of such a move wouldn't matter one iota to them.

Boycotts you say, sure 1 weekend, possibly 2, and then everyone moves on.
No concrete guarantees but it has been discussed on here several times and general consensus is that it is very unlikely to happen to us because there is not so much value in renaming a historic stadium like ours, usually only works with newer stadia.

Plus if they were going to do it then surely it would have happened by now.
 

Rowem

gently, down the stream
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
13,123
Location
London
"The city is ours, the city is ours, sponsored by Etihad, the city is ours...."
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
The funniest thing about this is The Mail, Mirror and Sun all carried a different figure for how much this name change was going to earn City.
 

Lynk

Obsessed with discrediting Danny Welbeck
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
14,976
"And the sick, commercial madness of naming rights means City now play in United Stadium cos Etihad means United in Arabic"



:lol:
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,780
tariqpanja tariq panja
EXCLUSIVE: Manchester City's 10-year agreement with Etihad Airways worth more than £300 million, according to person with knowledge of deal
Surely this can't be allowed by UEFA.
 

ha_rooney

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
38,933
£300 million!! If UEFA allow this then their financial regulations will have failed before they are even implemented.
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,780
According to Tariq Panja the deal is structured as 20m for Shirt Rights and 10m for Stadium. I think that will be accepted by UEFA.