Frosty
Logical and sensible but turns women gay
I think this decision could have been made in the Summer to be honest. Probably a loan with a view to a move.
I think Macheda had a deal lined up but we decided against it because the club refused to guarantee him chances in their team.Interesting that SAF thinks Macheda and Diouf need to be loaned out now. Which is exactly what every fan said in the summer.
Sorry, but Fergie has left me fecking baffled at times in the last few months.
how do you know that wasnt the case in the summer? Perhaps the suitable clubs did not come in for them?Interesting that SAF thinks Macheda and Diouf need to be loaned out now. Which is exactly what every fan said in the summer.
Sorry, but Fergie has left me fecking baffled at times in the last few months.
I think Macheda had a deal lined up but we decided against it because the club refused to guarantee him chances in their team.
I dont just say things for the sake of it...how do you know that wasnt the case in the summer? Perhaps the suitable clubs did not come in for them?
Or in Diouf's case. Noone at all
"I am not unhappy with that situation - I am not going to complain about it. Some clubs would love to have seven strikers," said the 69-year-old.
"There is a difficulty of course, in terms of managing the situation in the sense of the number of games they can get. But I've got those players - so get on with it.
"We'll compensate by making sure they train well and I expect them all to be here at the end of the transfer window.
"You might get an injury down the road you never know. At the moment I've no intention of changing."
The club in question refused to guarantee that he'd start for them in the league whenever he was fit. Which is fair enough really, especially for a Premier League team. The fact we wanted that clause inserted in the loan agreement strongly suggests that we weren't really interested in loaning him out.I think Macheda had a deal lined up but we decided against it because the club refused to guarantee him chances in their team.
With Owen, Berbatov and Chicharito out injured it's not looking that mental right now to be honest.My point is that deciding to have 7 strikers at the start of the season is fecking mental - if not unfair on the players not playing regularly. If what you say is correct, then we should have been pushing harder to loan them out, because its clear during the time of those quotes (around the middle of the August) its sounds like we weren't interested in loans at all.
I'm certain that if we really want them loaned out in January, you can bet we'll get it done.
With Welbeck and Owen's injury record I thought at the time that it made some sense to keep either Diouf or Macheda. But to keep both of them was pretty odd.With Owen, Berbatov and Chicharito out injured it's not looking that mental right now to be honest.
I'm certain Macheda was on his way to Newcastle only for the deal to break down at the last minute.With Welbeck and Owen's injury record I thought at the time that it made some sense to keep either Diouf or Macheda. But to keep both of them was pretty odd.
The Newcastle deal fell through a few days before deadline day. The last minute deal that broke down was with another PL club.I'm certain Macheda was on his way to Newcastle only for the deal to break down at the last minute.
Ah well there's a few clubs in the Premier League that in my opinion that could do with a centre-forward so hopefully he'll get a loan in January.The Newcastle deal fell through a few days before deadline day. The last minute deal that broke down was with another PL club.
Still hardly seems to have improved since 2009. When ever he plays for us he looks so limited. He needs to massively improve his overall game if he wants to make it as a United player.Still only 20.
Stupid thing to say, considering you know absolutely feck all about what impact its had on him professionally. A loan move isnt just about football. He's openly said his eyes were opened after such an experience, if that makes him grasp his chance with United and appreciate the opportunity he has here thats hardly a waste now is it?2011 is a wasted year for Macheda.
He made his last start for Sampdoria in February and his two starts for United were in League Cup, first on the wing and second against Palace.
He's 20 and a good loan move really helps (see Welbeck).
I meant it was a waste on the pitch.Stupid thing to say, considering you know absolutely feck all about what impact its had on him professionally. A loan move isnt just about football. He's openly said his eyes were opened after such an experience, if that makes him grasp his chance with United and appreciate the opportunity he has here thats hardly a waste now is it?
It's what he needs. If he's going to develop then he needs regular football. If he has a succesful spell and improves like Welbeck did at Sunderland, we'll take him back and he'll get his chance.Looks like he's going on loan. Here's a quote from his agent:
"I spoke last week with (sir Alex) Ferguson: I think that Federico will play somewhere else in January," Bia told Sportal.
Macheda set for New Year loan | Football News | Sky Sports
I am starting to think he won't make it at United.
Ah ok, It annoys me as many focus purely on the football side of things when at his age, so many other factors can have a greater impact.I meant it was a waste on the pitch.
Of course I'm happy he realised United is the best team for him and now he's probably even more determined to make it here.
I don't - he's a box striker reliant on service. Won't get that in Wigan.I don’t see a future for Macheda at Utd.
But then again I thought the same about Welbeck
I think Wigan would be a good loan move for him
Eh, he's shown great aggression at times, and has really changed games on occasion when coming on as a sub by pure aggression and physicality as much as anything.No aggression, not physical enough
Why would he be going on Loan because "we're not in the Champions League"."I spoke last week with (sir Alex) Ferguson: I think that Federico will play somewhere else in January," Bia told Sportal.
"He can no longer continue to be on the field for only 15 or 20 minutes, he must absolutely find more space.
"There are requests, but not from Italy. In the first week of January we will evaluate the proposals that we've received.
"Macheda's departure, however, has nothing to do with the elimination from the Champions League of the United "
I personally think that Wigan would be the wrong choice for a loan move. He is the kind of player that feeds off of chances, and well, Wigan create feck all in that particular department.I don’t see a future for Macheda at Utd.
But then again I thought the same about Welbeck
I think Wigan would be a good loan move for him
Sigh.I don't think it's a loan at all. I think it's a permanent move he is looking at.
If you actually read the article, while the article is about "a loan move" the quotes sound much more permanent than that.
Why would he be going on Loan because "we're not in the Champions League".
I think he is gone.
Exactly. The quotes seem to be pointing more towards an exit. A "departure" is a strange choice of words for a loan move.I'm not 100% convinced it's a loan either..the headlines point to it, as well as our expectations, but the quotes seem a little sus.
"I spoke to Ferguson last week, and Macheda will play somewhere else in January"
Pretty strange that his agent wouldn't even mention the fact it was a loan, if it was.