Nolan's Batman

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,998
Part 4: Gripes

Now I can fill the caf with gripes and plot holes, but I'm not going to as they don't matter a jot. Some one said earlier we nitpick Bay films yet give this a by. The reason, because they don't matter, the film itself was enjoyable so you do forgive it everything. If at the point of Batman returning within the last hours of the countdown and having a hollywood send off you care more about the facrt that he has recovered from having his back broken and made a full recovery from every injury he's ever had whilst become super srong, over the journey you've been on then maybe you need to lighten up.

I will happily nitpick a film to death if it was crap and pretends to be something it's not whilst getting praise from the highest quarters even though overall it dull, boring and shit (NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN, INCEPTION are prime examples). This though, this was a big goodbye to everyone and it was waving us off on a great fun ride. It was Nolan riding the bomb, stark naked, bollocks dangling in the wind and every other metaphor I can think of for not giving a shit other than enjoy the ride. It was a send of for us all and damned be sense and sensibility.

Well except for one gripe.......

and for me it was the biggest in the whole film. The Whole series. The one thing that I couldn't reconcile.

Alfred would never, ever, ever, ever leave Bruce. Don't justify it, don't argue it, it just wouldn't happen.

Superman would in cold blood murder Lois Lane and declare himself an anarchist. Bond would be impotent.

Alfred though would never ever leave.
 

Snow

Somewhere down the lane, a licky boom boom down
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
33,557
Location
Lousy Smarch weather
Alfred did leave Batman in the comics that TDKR is heavily based on. Look up Batman: Knighfall.
 

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,998
Alfred did leave Batman in the comics that TDKR is heavily based on. Look up Batman: Knighfall.
Don't care. Alfred doesn't ever ever leave Batman.
 

Leg-End

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
19,582
So he does in the source material but can't in the movie?
 

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,998
So he does in the source material but can't in the movie?
He doesn't really leave him in the source material though. He's still around. and ends up back with him very quickly to help him.
 

gaz1185

Full Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Messages
3,467
Location
Manchester
Don't care. Alfred doesn't ever ever leave Batman.
:lol: Well technically he didn't leave him, he decided to stay in England so he didn't have to see Bruce receive any more physical damage, but definitely what the film is referencing.

Other than that, it was a lovely little review / write up on the film btw, nice read.
 

gaz1185

Full Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Messages
3,467
Location
Manchester
He doesn't really leave him in the source material though. He's still around. and ends up back with him very quickly to help him.
Thinking of it that way, I do agree with your point, it would of been nice to see Alfred return earlier in the film and help Bruce Wayne tbh. The relationship between Wayne & Alfred was a fundamental plot point in the trilogy, but once Alfred leaves him there is nothing more about the two and is quite sad tbh, their scenes over the three films were always brilliant and it would of been nice to have a few more in TDKR. I understand it's meant to bring out more emotion in Alfred at the end because he feels that he “failed” the Wayne family, but surely he would of felt exactly the same way if he had returned to help him out.

There is also the point that nobody could have gotten back into Gotham during the siege, so maybe that’s why Alfred didn’t come back – but, again, that’s just nitpicking.
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,989
Location
Editing my own posts.
Something like this?

:lol:

Tag on this to the end and you've got a win.


Agree with pretty much all of gambits reviews/points/wafflings. Except probably this..

The only film he could make next would be the Dark Knight returns and for that we will have to wait for 20 years.
Since, well, wasn't this basically The Dark Knight Returns anyway?

And I think the whole Alfred thing was needed because he would've become a hindrance during the 3rd act, as he would've been one of the first to be round up. Other than that, I couldn't agree more with everything else.
 

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,998
I agree with that point, it would of been nice to see Alfred return earlier in the film and help Bruce Wayne tbh. The relationship between Wayne & Alfred was a fundamental plot point in the trilogy, but once Alfred leaves him there is nothing more about the two and is quite sad tbh, their scenes over the three films were always brilliant and it would of been nice to have a few more in TDKR. I understand it's meant to bring out more emotion in Alfred at the end because he feels that he “failed” the Wayne family, but surely he would of felt exactly the same way if he had returned to help him out.

There is also the point that nobody could have gotten back into Gotham during the siege, so maybe that’s why Alfred didn’t come back – but, again, that’s just nitpicking.
Alfred always gets where he needs to be. It would have been Alfred that would have got him out of the pit not some inner quest. He wouldn't have abandoned him completly. Instead he fecks off for the majority of the film and leaves him to it.
 

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,998
Since, well, wasn't this basically The Dark Knight Returns anyway?
No. More Knightfall, son of the demon and no mans land mash up. Read it (The Dark Knight returns), you'll like it. You'll see where the influences come in as well. Also you read the watchmen but did you know the whole thing was a metaphor for the superhero comc book industry.
 

Zen

Full Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
14,580
tbf, there is plenty of Returns in Rises(the start and kind of the ending), but I did come out thinking the same, that he could use it again more true to the novel if he wanted to do a 20 year later thing, but I highly doubt. Could Nolanverse really be so dumb as to not realize a Batman/Wayne reappearance again? Plus how often does the whole "go back to the franchise near retirement" actually work, but I guess it's a challenge. Despite the flaws, he broke the second sequel curse.
 

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,998
tbf, there is plenty of Returns in Rises(the start and kind of the ending), but I did come out thinking the same, that he could use it again more true to the novel if he wanted to do a 20 year later thing, but I highly doubt. Could Nolanverse really be so dumb as to not realize a Batman/Wayne reappearance again? Plus how often does the whole "go back to the franchise near retirement" actually work, but I guess it's a challenge. Despite the flaws, he broke the second sequel curse.
Yeah but no Batman beating the living crap out of Superman.
 

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,998
A friend made a good point. The fights between Bane and Batman were the live action equivalents of the Peter Griffen Rooster battles.
 

Luminous Lizard

Full Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Messages
4,543
Location
Manchester
Just got home from watching it. Why isn't Bane THAT strong? I want him to go round flipping cars and kicking Batman across rooms.
 

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,998
Just got home from watching it. Why isn't Bane THAT strong? I want him to go round flipping cars and kicking Batman across rooms.
He pretty much did in the first half, then Wayne jumped across a gap and the world changed.
 

Luminous Lizard

Full Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Messages
4,543
Location
Manchester
He beat him up before he was back in shape. But in the comics isn't he meant to have super strength? Plus it never went into the venom or anything to explain why he is so big. Apart from a few quick words that didn't really explain anything.
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,989
Location
Editing my own posts.
If you haven't realised they're supposed to be the toned down non-supernatural versions of these characters by now, you've missed the boat by about 8 years.
 

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,998
He beat him up before he was back in shape. But in the comics isn't he meant to have super strength? Plus it never went into the venom or anything to explain why he is so big. Apart from a few quick words that didn't really explain anything.
Why does it need to be explained why he's so big. It's not like the Hulk walked on screen.
 

Luminous Lizard

Full Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Messages
4,543
Location
Manchester
Because he isn't just some guy who went to the gym a lot. He was already strong then got injected with Venom making him exceptionally strong.
 

Luminous Lizard

Full Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Messages
4,543
Location
Manchester
So why can he punch holes in walls? That was my point, it didn't explain why he was such a beast. I was just asking if I missed anything that explained it.
 

Big-Red

Not actually very big
Staff
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
25,334
Location
Dublin
Supports
this year is my year on SM
Seen this again, still fantastic.
 

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,998
So why can he punch holes in walls? That was my point, it didn't explain why he was such a beast. I was just asking if I missed anything that explained it.
Eh? He was a big tough bastard. By that point it was all you needed to know. No venom or anything.
 

Big-Red

Not actually very big
Staff
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
25,334
Location
Dublin
Supports
this year is my year on SM
I just figured the fact he's a big bastard, added to the fact he has a small amount of constant pain killers put into his body, is why he's such a vicious bastard.
 

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,998
I just figured the fact he's a big bastard, added to the fact he has a small amount of constant pain killers put into his body, is why he's such a vicious bastard.
At that point, who cared?
 

gaz1185

Full Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Messages
3,467
Location
Manchester
So why can he punch holes in walls? That was my point, it didn't explain why he was such a beast. I was just asking if I missed anything that explained it.
I just figured the fact he's a big bastard, added to the fact he has a small amount of constant pain killers put into his body, is why he's such a vicious bastard.
Yeah, basically he's just a viciously skilled fighting machine who's constantly filled with pain killers so he hardly feels anything, hence the reason he was so feared by people. His strength seemed to be there whilst he was in the Pit, but his fighting skills that made him who he was were trained to him by the LoS.

The punching holes in to walls only came at the end, but I think that was due to pure rage. Batman had found his weakness and started to dislodge the mask, once the painkillers stopped working on Bane he seems to flip, losing his close combat skills and just throwing punches anywhere in anger just to get at Batman.
 

Big-Red

Not actually very big
Staff
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
25,334
Location
Dublin
Supports
this year is my year on SM
Yeah, basically he's just a viciously skilled fighting machine who's constantly filled with pain killers so he hardly feels anything, hence the reason he was so feared by people. His strength seemed to be there whilst he was in the Pit, but his fighting skills that made him who he was were trained to him by the LoS.

The punching holes in to walls only came at the end, but I think that was due to pure rage. Batman had found his weakness and started to dislodge the mask, once the painkillers stopped working on Bane he seems to flip, losing his close combat skills and just throwing punches anywhere in anger just to get at Batman.
This, exactly what I concluded.
 

gaz1185

Full Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Messages
3,467
Location
Manchester
This, exactly what I concluded.
;) One of my favourite scenes as well, to me it just shown the first signs of nervousness in Bane's character that we hadn't seen before and was well blended with the action / fighting sequence.
 

Hal9000

Full Member
Joined
May 24, 2010
Messages
6,323
One of my main issues.

The prisoners of the pit could of easily escapred without the jump. Why couldn't they all just shimmy up the safety rope? As it was attached to the top of the pit
 

Eyepopper

Lowering the tone since 2006
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
66,961
Saw it last night. I enjoyed it but I thought it was the weakest of the 3.
 

dumbo

Don't Just Fly…Soar!
Scout
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
9,403
Location
Thucydides nuts
One of my main issues.

The prisoners of the pit could of easily escapred without the jump. Why couldn't they all just shimmy up the safety rope? As it was attached to the top of the pit
:lol: Surely not. They were lead climbing.
 

Stick

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2005
Messages
6,686
Supports
Liverpool
One of my main issues.

The prisoners of the pit could of easily escapred without the jump. Why couldn't they all just shimmy up the safety rope? As it was attached to the top of the pit
It was attached mid way up to break the fall of the climber.
 

Woodzy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
14,806
Location
Cardiff
One of my main issues.

The prisoners of the pit could of easily escapred without the jump. Why couldn't they all just shimmy up the safety rope? As it was attached to the top of the pit
You may be getting confused with the rope at the top that Wayne dropped down on his way out. This was obviously the rope that Bane uses to get in/out of the pit. The support rope for climbing was only attached mid way.