NM
Full Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2011
- Messages
- 12,354
The feck? I looked at this and thought "easy win for Isotope". I look at the voting and he is getting smashed! What am I missing?
You don't half not get a hint, do you?Such a limited fullback is a sore thumb to any team. There's a reason why he's losing his place to Evra, and Argentina had a porous defence with him there. To be fair, I heard he's getting a good review playing as centerback with Rome.
Are you kidding me? I'm telling you Boban is key to your midfield and that you need to overcome the fact that people do indeed not rate him as highly as I do.Just found out it's true only few rate Boban nowadays. Antohan even 'questioning' if Boban can get the best of Heinze.
Before anyone complains, "miserable Roman" is a reference to a running joke in Argentina about Riquelme always looking miserable and constantly having personal problems, arguments with Boca management, retiring, coming back, then retiring again... It was a regular TV show question now etched in popular culture "Riquelme, are you happy?", and Riquelme invariably answering "Yes, I'm happy" and looking like someone just stamped on his bollocks.
Someone latched onto it and actually made an ad campaign entirely based on Riquelme looking his usual miserable self but eventually drawing a smile from him when he used their products...
See below, the miserable feck is playing to that persona now and making a ton of money out of it
We will remember to consider your vote in case the match is decided by a difference of 1 vote. Looks unlikely.I mistakenly voted for kps. Can I change my vote to isotope?
Difference of two votes = drawWe will remember to consider your vote in case the match is decided by a difference of 1 vote. Looks unlikely.
Yep, this ones over.Extreme midfield control won't claw back a 9 vote advantage. You need to score and just got rid of arguably your most prolific goalscorer. Nuts.
Agree, Valeron should be playing behind the striker, his natural position. Iso has a number of quality midfielders, it's a case of getting them in the team.Gobsmacked that Forlan has been given the nod ahead of Valeron.
Eto'o?Extreme midfield control won't claw back a 9 vote advantage. You need to score and just got rid of arguably your most prolific goalscorer. Nuts.
It certainly was Eto'o that made it "arguable", who else?Eto'o?
Tbf, I was going to vote for you. I'm a big big Riquelme and Kohler fan. But that changes worked for me. As far as Davids and Cambiasso getting to Valeron goes, I can argue that he has Redondo marking Riquelme. And Riquelme had 2 major weaknesses which makes your team worse. For one, he needed team play to be based round him and two, he could be marked out of the game. Put Gatusso or Redondo on him and he'd be non existent. As much as I love the player, he really struggled with quality man marking.No that's fine. Although Davids and Cambiasso will eat Valeron for breakfast
I don't get people who wait too long to place their vote though. It's almost as if you're willing to completely forget the first lineup as long as the second one is good.
Bayern has a donkey upfront. Dortmund has only one experience striker and a rookie as their goal threat. And seems like Barca are doing fine with it. I love Forlan as the next man (as you can see, I put him on my first formation), but seems like not many voters rate him. I still think Forlan and Eto'o duo (at their peak) would run havoc at any defence any can put.Extreme midfield control won't claw back a 9 vote advantage. You need to score and just got rid of arguably your most prolific goalscorer. Nuts.
I'm voting for Isotope. It seems to me like kps has too much riding on Riquelme. If he's marked out of the game, there's no one to get the ball to the dangerous front 3. Neither Davids nor Cambiasso are good distributors.
For Isotope, even if Valeron's marked out of the game, Redondo is an excellent distributor from deep.
Doing fine. Pop in every now and then though I rarely post.How Have you been RI? Haven't seen you on here much since the cricket draft!
Thanks, RI. Any sympathy votes are welcome.I'm voting for Isotope. It seems to me like kps has too much riding on Riquelme. If he's marked out of the game, there's no one to get the ball to the dangerous front 3. Neither Davids nor Cambiasso are good distributors.
For Isotope, even if Valeron's marked out of the game, Redondo is an excellent distributor from deep.
Well, it could, if you bastard would vote for me6 votes in it, this could be memorable!
Worried you are now 15-8? That's quite a comeback he is mounting.I don't get people who wait too long to place their vote though. It's almost as if you're willing to completely forget the first lineup as long as the second one is good.
Haha! Sorry man, couldn't. Was leaning towards Kp anyway and when you took off Forlan and refused to target Heinze it was the final straw. You do have midfield control (would've been better if you started that way) but your threat is diminished IMO, particulary against that pair of CBs.Well, it could, if you bastard would vote for me
Worried you are now 15-8? That's quite a comeback he is mounting.
The voting lasts 24 hours. He made that change before he even got to the 20th minute or so.
Early votes are needed to gage how things are going and enough people will vote purely on thinking one side is clearly superior and there's no chance it will change.
In this game, I reckon there was more than the starting lineups to it and wanted to see the twists and turns along the way.
I told you the moment you got him that Riquelme was a double-edged sword. As it stands, Redondo stops Riquelme and you stop being fluid and start relying on isolated efforts.
No, he can't, which is my dilemma here. I could see him winning this if he played it right and I can see him controlling the game but he has lost so much firepower...Am I right in thinking you can't bring Forlan back on?I remember Brwned making trial substitutions . I think you might've changed personelle of early.