LVG Out Thread | BBC: Sacked!

Do you want LVG sacked?


  • Total voters
    1,419
Status
Not open for further replies.

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,629
Location
Barrow In Furness
It's a tough call. Do the club sack him now and see if Giggs can keep us in the top four? Or let him stay and try to equal what he did last season before giving him the boot in hope of an attainable world class manager in the Summer?

I think unless we go and lose a couple of games in the next four, he's safe until the end of the season and he's going to get to spend even more money in January... Despite injuries, we should be looking at 10 Points in the next four games.
The injuries are make things very difficult. If we lose a lot of points this month, then he could be in serious trouble.
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,892
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
As opposed to Ranieri at Leicester, or Tuchel or Dortmund? Examples of managers fitting their clubs and clicking immediately.
Yes I suppose those two managers have strung a couple of decent results together haven't they - Ranieri out Van Gaal in! And woe betide Ranieri drops any points, because this Tuchel fella sounds great - actually Ranieri out Tuchel in! But hang on, what about the much-discussed Klopp, who WAS the greatest manager of all time on Sunday at 4pm, but by 6pm, he had been beaten by Shteve McLaren, who at 4pm on Sunday was the WORST manager of all time, so now surely it is in fact Shteve McClaren who is the king of all the managers and should instantly replace Tuchel as Manchester Utd boss?
 

Attila

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
11,070
Location
RIP Mino
Supports
Trad Bricks
It's a tough call. Do the club sack him now and see if Giggs can keep us in the top four? Or let him stay and try to equal what he did last season before giving him the boot in hope of an attainable world class manager in the Summer?

I think unless we go and lose a couple of games in the next four, he's safe until the end of the season and he's going to get to spend even more money in January... Despite injuries, we should be looking at 10 Points in the next four games.
Sacking him for Giggs would be pretty insane right now. At least with LVG you know we will most likely get top 4. Anything could happen with Giggs in charge
 

bleedred

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2011
Messages
5,825
Location
404
Just out of curiosity, Has he ever accepted his fault in losing a game over the past 18 months?. Its always seem to be something else.
 

Attila

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
11,070
Location
RIP Mino
Supports
Trad Bricks
Yes I suppose those two managers have strung a couple of decent results together haven't they - Ranieri out Van Gaal in! And woe betide Ranieri drops any points, because this Tuchel fella sounds great - actually Ranieri out Tuchel in! But hang on, what about the much-discussed Klopp, who WAS the greatest manager of all time on Sunday at 4pm, but by 6pm, he had been beaten by Shteve McLaren, who at 4pm on Sunday was the WORST manager of all time, so now surely it is in fact Shteve McClaren who is the king of all the managers and should instantly replace Tuchel as Manchester Utd boss?
His point was that it doesn't take 2 years to get a team playing well and managers can come get things sorted a lot quicker like Tuchel did at Dortmund. He didn't say give them the Man Utd job.
 

Dobba

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
28,714
Location
"You and your paper can feck off."
Yes I suppose those two managers have strung a couple of decent results together haven't they - Ranieri in Van Gaal out! And woe betide Ranieri drops any points, because this Tuchel fella sounds great - actually Ranieri out Tuchel in! But hang on, what about the much-discussed Klopp, who WAS the greatest manager of all time on Sunday at 4pm, but by 6pm, he had been beaten by Shteve McLaren, who at 4pm on Sunday was the WORST manager of all time, so now surely it is in fact Shteve McClaren who is the king of all the managers and should instantly replace Tuchel as Manchester Utd boss?
:lol: Bravo.
 

Glory Glory Denis Irwin

Glory Glory Denis Irwin
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
868
Yes I suppose those two managers have strung a couple of decent results together haven't they - Ranieri out Van Gaal in! And woe betide Ranieri drops any points, because this Tuchel fella sounds great - actually Ranieri out Tuchel in! But hang on, what about the much-discussed Klopp, who WAS the greatest manager of all time on Sunday at 4pm, but by 6pm, he had been beaten by Shteve McLaren, who at 4pm on Sunday was the WORST manager of all time, so now surely it is in fact Shteve McClaren who is the king of all the managers and should instantly replace Tuchel as Manchester Utd boss?
Wow that's a mature post. Well done.
 

spwd

likes: servals, breasts, rylan clark and zooey
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
8,834
Location
Lyecestershyre
Lets wait till the end of the season shall we..

There's still 3 trophies he could win.
But in all honesty we won't, absolutely no chance,we couldn't even beat Middlesbrough, what evidence is there that we may win these 3 trophies because I surely don't see any.
 

bleedred

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2011
Messages
5,825
Location
404
Sacking him for Giggs would be pretty insane right now. At least with LVG you know we will most likely get top 4. Anything could happen with Giggs in charge
Its a risk either way. If we are going to part with him in the summer, as many seem to agree, I don't see any reason for him to continue on.

The longer this kind of results go on, the sooner the players will start losing him. I think it has already started. A change could be refreshing for the players.
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,892
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
Wow that's a mature post. Well done.
Don't want to get into arguments with individuals because it gets personal and we all want the best for the club at the end of the day, but the point I'm making is a serious one - which is that where do you stop just chopping managers? If you get rid of LvG under these circumstances you would have also had plenty of grounds for getting rid of SAF on more than one occasions and that didn't turn out too bad did it
 

spwd

likes: servals, breasts, rylan clark and zooey
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
8,834
Location
Lyecestershyre
Don't want to get into arguments with individuals because it gets personal and we all want the best for the club at the end of the day, but the point I'm making is a serious one - which is that where do you stop just chopping managers? If you get rid of LvG under these circumstances you would have also had plenty of grounds for getting rid of SAF on more than one occasions and that didn't turn out too bad did it
But lvg says he's not staying anyway which is a short term appointment so it's not really chopping managers because he's leaving soon anyway.
 

Livewire1974

If it moves, report it.
Joined
Jul 14, 2009
Messages
7,816
Location
Dublin
Don't want to get into arguments with individuals because it gets personal and we all want the best for the club at the end of the day, but the point I'm making is a serious one - which is that where do you stop just chopping managers? If you get rid of LvG under these circumstances you would have also had plenty of grounds for getting rid of SAF on more than one occasions and that didn't turn out too bad did it
The only time SAF was in danger was early in his United career, when he was a relatively young manager. LVG has already said he is retiring soon.
 

Glory Glory Denis Irwin

Glory Glory Denis Irwin
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
868
Don't want to get into arguments with individuals because it gets personal and we all want the best for the club at the end of the day, but the point I'm making is a serious one - which is that where do you stop just chopping managers? If you get rid of LvG under these circumstances you would have also had plenty of grounds for getting rid of SAF on more than one occasions and that didn't turn out too bad did it
I'm not even saying that he should immediately go but to say that we shouldn't expect better after 18 months and nearly unlimited funds as manager is idiotic. His signings have been nearly all appalling so far and his style of football makes me wonder why I pay nearly £1,000 a year to go and watch them.
I think you're forgetting that Ferguson inherited a team 2nd from bottom of the table with a poor squad and a drinking problem. He had a bad season and a half results-wise but did a hell of a lot behind the scenes at the club that justified keeping him on.
 

VeevaVee

The worst "V"
Scout
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
46,263
Location
Manchester
Don't want to get into arguments with individuals because it gets personal and we all want the best for the club at the end of the day, but the point I'm making is a serious one - which is that where do you stop just chopping managers? If you get rid of LvG under these circumstances you would have also had plenty of grounds for getting rid of SAF on more than one occasions and that didn't turn out too bad did it


Whilst we shouldn't be too hasty with sacking managers, we also shouldn't go too far the other way and hang on to people just so we don't look like one of those clubs. There's more important things at stake than that.
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,892
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
Yeah true, but you could just as easily argue that if he has been bought in on a short(ish) contract to do a specific job (and he is doing it - CL Qualification being the target) then why chop him midway through that contract with no obvious replacement?

Also, would argue you COULD have chopped Fergie during the "Djemba-Djemba" years if you are going to hold him to the somewhat harsh standards van Gaal is being held too, but stuck by him and he built another great side
 

Sammyjunn

New Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
10,299
Location
In Smalling's pocket (as every other person)
Yeah true, but you could just as easily argue that if he has been bought in on a short(ish) contract to do a specific job (and he is doing it - CL Qualification being the target) then why chop him midway through that contract with no obvious replacement?

Also, would argue you COULD have chopped Fergie during the "Djemba-Djemba" years if you are going to hold him to the somewhat harsh standards van Gaal is being held too, but stuck by him and he built another great side
Fergie had proved himself here at United, LVG has done feck all. Quite a difference.
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,892
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
I'm not even saying that he should immediately go but to say that we shouldn't expect better after 18 months and nearly unlimited funds as manager is idiotic. His signings have been nearly all appalling so far and his style of football makes me wonder why I pay nearly £1,000 a year to go and watch them.
I think you're forgetting that Ferguson inherited a team 2nd from bottom of the table with a poor squad and a drinking problem. He had a bad season and a half results-wise but did a hell of a lot behind the scenes at the club that justified keeping him on.
Well I don't think any of LvG's signings have been "appalling" and it hasn't been funds that have been the problem, it's been getting enough players of sufficient quality through the door when they all settled at other clubs. In my opinion, every single signing has improved us, just need several more!

Ferguson inherited a poor side, but he also spent big money (in context) and not always on good players. Was also given much more time, albeit if the Internet had been around then, and Sky TV, I genuinely think he would have been sacked
 

Question234

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
2,598
Location
?
Ive moaned about Rooney all season, but watching how LVG is destroying other talented players im starting to think Rooney may still be a good player and its LVG`s tactics and fecking philosophy that makes good players crap.


~Think about all the players who have gone to shit under LVG!
Come on Rooney has become fecking shite.

No manager would want to work with rooney atm.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,582
Most of LVGs signings are injured anyway. Herrera, Rojo, Morgan, Shaw, now Darmian. Adding in Smalling and Jones + Rooney. Thats a big part of the spine. Add 90% of these players to our team, we probably end up going through.

I still say LVG has done an overall good job rescuing us from the Moyes Era (error?):
-Moved on "deadwood"
-Signed a good set of youngsters to take us forward for years to come (when fit)
-Brought us CL football again (even tho were going to Europa now).

Hes done some bad things too, like his insistence on always playing Rooney even when it doesnt make sense, or falling out / refusing to play form players like Young and Herrera. His inability to actually change a game whilst its happening.
 

mattsville

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2005
Messages
1,090
Location
Dublin
Ironic how spent all of last season grinding out to get to the CL, only to go out at the first hurdle.
And here we are, after a year experiencing his surroundings, getting a shit load of money to shape the squad, then cutting the squad to a bare minimum, having to play the likes of Varela where Rafael was sold, Borthwick-Jackson, McNair are never United quality, certainly not right now and most likely ever, they are playing cos he has to play them due to injuries, it is incredible negligence, still grinding out "results", mostly draws in a sleep inducing fashion, feck this shit, he should be judged acutely on this season, and it is nothing short of poxy, the league table is staving of some of the criticism, that is going to change rapidly, we have a shit load of injuries, more tonight, no squad to support it, is his motivation ticking the the boxes on his contract by playing youth players (cos he has no other option), got you to the CL (actually Europa league), reality, we are all over the place and it is damaging the image of the club.
 

RedTillI'mDead

A Key Tool
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
5,475
Location
London
Yes I suppose those two managers have strung a couple of decent results together haven't they - Ranieri out Van Gaal in! And woe betide Ranieri drops any points, because this Tuchel fella sounds great - actually Ranieri out Tuchel in! But hang on, what about the much-discussed Klopp, who WAS the greatest manager of all time on Sunday at 4pm, but by 6pm, he had been beaten by Shteve McLaren, who at 4pm on Sunday was the WORST manager of all time, so now surely it is in fact Shteve McClaren who is the king of all the managers and should instantly replace Tuchel as Manchester Utd boss?
Message of the month/ season/ decade!

There is no patience in football any more.

Personally I think we are in a time in football of few world class players who are significantly ahead of the rest. Barcelona/ Madrid/ Bayern get these players. After that there is a second tier, Chelsea/ City/ PSG all are willing to gamble significantly more. United and Juve are then maybe category 3.

There are times United will be at 2nd slot, but I think maybe not as consistently. We seem to miss out on the Aguero's, Hazard's, De Bruyne's, Silva, etc, I.e. the slightly more proven/ higher rated players.

United have money no doubt, but not as much as meets the eye. A lot of cash is cycled I.e. lots of players out and others in making net spend less than it seems. Chelsea are heading that way and look at their struggles (but they have advantage of location). City continue to spend huge money!

The fact is few managers can do a SAF and make the average look sublime and in reality SAF actually had a fair amount of the sublime. I think even SAF would struggle in todays world. Mourinho showed he could compete in SAF's time, but I think the combination of more teams with more money and a higher segregation between the world class players and the next tier has meant it's far more difficult to build a consistent and top drawer winning team.

It was right to sack Moyes, he wasn't respected and you need to own the dressing room. LVG is different, his philosophy may not be working yet, but take into account the above and in reality it's not as bad as it seems. Maybe more Wenger than SAF in todays world, but SAF could easily be more Mourinho of this season in today's world.

The above all being said, LVG is due to retire so is not the long term option. There are few managers that would have enough crudentials and history to hold down the position and guaranteed criticism that will undoubtedly come at some point. I have doubts about Guardiola, but he would pull in some interesting players, his tactics could build on what we have, he is young enough and has moved enough that he may be willing to stay and build over several years. If he is available it has to be a case of better to get him than see City or Chelsea or Madrid get him! (Madrid unlikely, but you get the point)
 

Dobba

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
28,714
Location
"You and your paper can feck off."
And here we are, after a year experiencing his surroundings, getting a shit load of money to shape the squad, then cutting the squad to a bare minimum, having to play the likes of Varela where Rafael was sold, Borthwick-Jackson, McNair are never United quality, certainly not right now and most likely ever, they are playing cos he has to play them due to injuries, it is incredible negligence, still grinding out "results", mostly draws in a sleep inducing fashion, feck this shit, he should be judged acutely on this season, and it is nothing short of poxy, the league table is staving of some of the criticism, that is going to change rapidly, we have a shit load of injuries, more tonight, no squad to support it, is his motivation ticking the the boxes on his contract by playing youth players (cos he has no other option), got you to the CL (actually Europa league), reality, we are all over the place and it is damaging the image of the club.
I want to live in this universe where, when every other defender at the club is injured, suddenly Rafael is fit consistently enough to make any sodding difference
 

DarkXaero

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
2,286
Location
NJ, USA
No point in sacking him now unless he completely loses the players' trust & the dressing room, and our current bad form continues. I absolutely want him gone after the end of this season though.
 

GeneralGattuso

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2014
Messages
349
Absolutely. Both favour a possession based style of football.
That's about where it ends. Pep has gone on record as saying he hates Tiki-taka football, possession without any intent is pointless, passing for the sake of it serves no purpose. LVG on the other hand sees the entire game revolving around possession, if we have the ball, we control the game. That mindset is an expansion of "if we have the ball, the opposition can't hurt us". To LVG if we have over 60% possession, we have dominated the game and therefore the game plan worked. Pep doesn't see it like that at all, he wants possession so his team can score and create more opportunities, it's attack minded. It's about passing and moving while with the ball, playing in the oppositions half, where if you lose it they can do little damage and if you win it back, you have a chance to score quickly. LVG just wants the ball to be recycled, passed around until a weak spot or hole is found, where the game is played and the tempo is less important, only a pacey forward or big target man to exploit the space is needed. Entirely different mindsets, very different approaches to defending. Possession is just a means to an end for Pep, to LVG it is the be-all and end-all.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,929
Location
London
That's about where it ends. Pep has gone on record as saying he hates Tiki-taka football, possession without any intent is pointless, passing for the sake of it serves no purpose. LVG on the other hand sees the entire game revolving around possession, if we have the ball, we control the game. That mindset is an expansion of "if we have the ball, the opposition can't hurt us". To LVG if we have over 60% possession, we have dominated the game and therefore the game plan worked. Pep doesn't see it like that at all, he wants possession so his team can score and create more opportunities, it's attack minded. It's about passing and moving while with the ball, playing in the oppositions half, where if you lose it they can do little damage and if you win it back, you have a chance to score quickly. LVG just wants the ball to be recycled, passed around until a weak spot or hole is found, where the game is played and the tempo is less important, only a pacey forward or big target man to exploit the space is needed. Entirely different mindsets, very different approaches to defending. Possession is just a means to an end for Pep, to LVG it is the be-all and end-all.
This is spot on.

Actually, Pep's posession football is both more similar (and influenced from) to Bielsa's brand of football.

Bielsa couldn't make it into a top club though, but the ideas are quite similar. Insane pressing, fast movements, playing into the other side's half and trying to kill the other team is how Pep likes it.

Zombie passing to the keeper and between the CBs, and insane patience until the other team mistakes is how LVG seems to like it.
 

Chorley1974

Lady Ole
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
13,071
Most of LVGs signings are injured anyway. Herrera, Rojo, Morgan, Shaw, now Darmian. Adding in Smalling and Jones + Rooney. Thats a big part of the spine. Add 90% of these players to our team, we probably end up going through.

I still say LVG has done an overall good job rescuing us from the Moyes Era (error?):
-Moved on "deadwood"
-Signed a good set of youngsters to take us forward for years to come (when fit)
-Brought us CL football again (even tho were going to Europa now).

Hes done some bad things too, like his insistence on always playing Rooney even when it doesnt make sense, or falling out / refusing to play form players like Young and Herrera. His inability to actually change a game whilst its happening.
Good points here, I largely agree with them.

The key for me is that we need to improve this season in terms of performance, if not there's no point in continuing into the last year of his contract, may as well let him go, we know how our team's performance when fergie was planning to retire first time around. LVG is never going to survive on the basis of moving deadwood, bringing through youngsters etc unless we are also performing well. For such an experienced manager it looked nailed on to make the knockout stages bearing in mind the group we drew, regardless of the positives this is a step backwards.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,659
If Ancelotti is available and wants the job, he should get it come the morning.

If there is no other quality manager available, LvG should finish the season.
 

FujiVice

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
7,350
If Ancelotti is available and wants the job, he should get it come the morning.

If there is no other quality manager available, LvG should finish the season.
I think so too. Van Gaal's contract is up next year. If he isnt the long term manager, we should get someone who is. I found myself agreeing with Michael Owen tonight. That's the final straw for me, when I'm nodding my head at that clown. We've spent £200 million in 2 years. You should be winning titles with that investment.

Its not 2013. Pep and Ancelotti are available in the next 6 months if we want them. There top are managers out there.
 

caid

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
8,376
Location
Dublin
I hate the style of football so its hard for me to stick with him when results are crap.
But i dont see the point anymore.
I wouldn't be in a rush but i'd be looking for his replacement now.

I just think theres better managers out there and we've probably gained as much out of him as were going to get.
He steadied the ship but i dont see him doing anything worthwhile going forward with it.
If he cant win the league with the current level of opposition I just dont see how he ever will. anyway.
 

Moriarty

Full Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
19,148
Location
Reichenbach Falls
I think so too. Van Gaal's contract is up next year. If he isnt the long term manager, we should get someone who is. I found myself agreeing with Michael Owen tonight. That's the final straw for me, when I'm nodding my head at that clown. We've spent £200 million in 2 years. You should be winning titles with that investment.

Its not 2013. Pep and Ancelotti are available in the next 6 months if we want them. There top are managers out there.
What did he say?
 

pocco

loco
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
22,670
Location
Keep a clean shit tomorrow, United is my final bus
Depending how you view things currently it was either very insightful or Michael Owen talking.

He basically said spend ££££ equals winning titles. Very simple from a very simple man.
Not entirely true. He said he thinks we'll throw more money at it but that questions need to be asked as to whether Van Gaal can be trusted with more money. He also said we've been shite since he arrived and it's not just tonight that is the issue.
 

mu77

New Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2002
Messages
7,004
top 4 (4th actually the bottom of the top 4) ffs are we are asrenil in disguise
 
Status
Not open for further replies.