Schweinsteiger Suffers MCL Injury

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,792
Location
india
We paid like £7m for him, it was a gamble worth taking and it's by no means been a failure overall.
Yep. He will be 32 when next season starts. It's not beyond the realms of possibility that he will give us two good seasons of quality midfield play and leadership. And as you say, it was worth the risk given the quality of the player and the fee.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,792
Location
india
He's just about done my man. I don't expect much when he returns. He wasn't exactly sprightly to begin with. Maybe I'm too pessimistic considering he's not someone who's game is based on being athletic like say Kai's dad. It's still the EPL though, the world's most physically demanding league.
As demanding as it is, Giggs and Scholes contributed big time while often playing at walking pace. As physically demanding as it is, classy players often stand out even more.
 

DatIrishFella

Band of Brothers, Thief
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,587
Location
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Having someone like him in the dressing room is more important that on the pitch in some ways. Whats the time frame on his return?
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,717
From the club who sold us Owen Hargreaves
 

Vilev

New Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2015
Messages
2,310
We paid like £7m for him, it was a gamble worth taking and it's by no means been a failure overall.
We did not, it's wrong to calculate it that way. The cost of the player per year is portion of his transfer fee (transfer fee/contract duration) and his salary. He pay him huge salary and will continue to be doing so. That's the reason he cost 7m, that the reason we offloaded Nani and RVP for 3-4m, nobody would take their salaries otherwise.
And if we factor it in then basically a Vidal on a 5-year deal at 30m comes at almost the same price per year in expenses, maybe just a little bit higher, than Bastian on a three years deal.

And while in computer games or fantasy football or whatever you operate with these net spending and things like that, real football clubs as any real businesses actually operate differently, under financial standards. So a price of the asset in expenses is not the money you've paid for it. Especially if the asset needs money to maintain it's useful economic live and in financial terms that is exactly what salary is.
After Keane left, he was the player most of us dreamed of signing to reboot our midfield. We thought it never had a chance of happening so when it did, even if it was past his best years, it was hugely exciting.
not sure how that's relevant. I mean would you be ecstatic if we sign Kaka. Or any other player who is way-way past it?
I consider is like picking up garbage, that maybe overly harsh, i don't mean like garbage-garbage. More like a thing that is basically wasted and not needed by it's original owner. Maybe a second-hand is a better analogy.
 

marjen

Desperately wants to be like Noodle
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Messages
8,643
Location
At the back post
So that's his season done then and I have to say I'm a bit underwhelmed.

For me, the biggest thing is Schweinsteiger at his peak was a physical beast. At United, it doesn't look like he's been busting his guts to stay fit, which obviously impacts his game to a great degree.

He's still been pretty much our best midfielder about half of the games he's played, but I think that says a lot about how poorly we've performed and not a lot about Bastian, who's a shadow of his former self.

I wouldn't play him ahead of Carrick or Schneiderlin at this point.
 

Crossie

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2015
Messages
4,929
Supports
vibrant attacking football
I don't necessarily disagree, but Schweinsteiger was already injury prone before he joined us
Very true.

We did not, it's wrong to calculate it that way. The cost of the player per year is portion of his transfer fee (transfer fee/contract duration) and his salary. He pay him huge salary and will continue to be doing so. That's the reason he cost 7m, that the reason we offloaded Nani and RVP for 3-4m, nobody would take their salaries otherwise.
Plus in most cases a generous signing fee for the player and his agent.

We paid like £7m for him, it was a gamble worth taking and it's by no means been a failure overall.
I'm divided on this. I also wouldn't consider him a failure. However, it appears as if the prospect of getting Bastian drove United away from Gündogan. IMHO the latter would have been more worth a gamble than BFS.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,956
Location
France
Ofcourse he can. The club can withdraw him too.
If the game is scheduled during an official international break the club has to release the player and iirc a non injured players has to join his national team.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
He was always going to be a gamble but one worth taking given his price, previous quality and history with LVG. If it doesn't work out then so be it.

As a lot of us said in the summer, the important thing was that we weren't actually depending on him. Signing Schneiderlin as well at least meant we'd be covered in terms of numbers.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,171
Location
Manchester
We did not, it's wrong to calculate it that way. The cost of the player per year is portion of his transfer fee (transfer fee/contract duration) and his salary. He pay him huge salary and will continue to be doing so. That's the reason he cost 7m, that the reason we offloaded Nani and RVP for 3-4m, nobody would take their salaries otherwise.
And if we factor it in then basically a Vidal on a 5-year deal at 30m comes at almost the same price per year in expenses, maybe just a little bit higher, than Bastian on a three years deal.

And while in computer games or fantasy football or whatever you operate with these net spending and things like that, real football clubs as any real businesses actually operate differently, under financial standards. So a price of the asset in expenses is not the money you've paid for it. Especially if the asset needs money to maintain it's useful economic live and in financial terms that is exactly what salary is.
I'm well aware of how assets are written down in financial reporting and in fact deal with the finance aspect of football for a living, but thank you for the bizarrely condescending attempt at a lesson. I was merely saying his transfer fee was a relative pittance for a player of his experience and calibre. The notion that Bayern ripped us off or that he's a flop is just not true.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,392
Location
Barrow In Furness
I'm well aware of how assets are written down in financial reporting and in fact deal with the finance aspect of football for a living, but thank you for the bizarrely condescending attempt at a lesson. I was merely saying his transfer fee was a relative pittance for a player of his experience and calibre. The notion that Bayern ripped us off or that he's a flop is just not true.
I don't think Bayern ripped us off, but they had their reasons for not fighting to keep him. The reason we have now found out. It was an exciting signing that has ended up a bit underwhelming. I think in the summer it will either be him or Carrick who stays. Don't think we will keep both. Depending who the manager is we might not keep either.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,956
Location
France
I'm well aware of how assets are written down in financial reporting and in fact deal with the finance aspect of football for a living, but thank you for the bizarrely condescending attempt at a lesson. I was merely saying his transfer fee was a relative pittance for a player of his experience and calibre. The notion that Bayern ripped us off or that he's a flop is just not true.
We have found Woody!
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,171
Location
Manchester
I don't think Bayern ripped us off, but they had their reasons for not fighting to keep him. The reason we have now found out. It was an exciting signing that has ended up a bit underwhelming. I think in the summer it will either be him or Carrick who stays. Don't think we will keep both. Depending who the manager is we might not keep either.
We all knew at the time that there were questions over his fitness given his injury issues but I still think it was a signing worth making. Players like him are great to have around even if they're not playing every week.

We have found Woody!
:lol: shit, busted
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,266
Location
Lucilinburhuc
Some comments in here are embarrassing. I expect him on 1st July to turn up at Carrington, hopefully lean.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,520
Fabulous more Fellaini in central midfield then with Herrera and Schweinsteiger injured.
 

Esquire

Full Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Messages
2,318
Had more than a decent season, scored some crucial goals, great goals even, played some blinders and scored the penalty in the CL final after Ronaldo had missed. I'm happy enough with that but, in the grand scheme of things, Bayern knew what they were doing there. Same here with Schweinsteiger.

He has been rubbish tbf, with the exception of a good cameo against West Ham
Yip. Hargreaves when fit was a monster. Shame he just broke down.
 

dannyrhinos89

OMG socks and sandals lol!
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
14,453
We got him cheap So we might aswell get rid in the summer it'll hardly be noticable if we do get rid because he has been very uninspiring so far in the matches he has played he's simply not the same Schweiny he was at Bayern

add to that he's probably one of our top earners and those wages could be better spent elsewhere.
 

skidmark

Account closed by request: 23/12/16
Joined
May 28, 2015
Messages
1,744
Supports
Utd, and NUFC
The time out depends how bad the tear is and the article is not particularly clear on that, so could be anywhere from weeks to a season finisher. But, international friendlies, I just don't see the point of them. Not only does it mean we miss a week of club football as fans, but the team suffer injuries in return...great.
 

Vilev

New Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2015
Messages
2,310
I'm well aware of how assets are written down in financial reporting and in fact deal with the finance aspect of football for a living, but thank you for the bizarrely condescending attempt at a lesson. I was merely saying his transfer fee was a relative pittance for a player of his experience and calibre. The notion that Bayern ripped us off or that he's a flop is just not true.
I would not have to explain it to you if you'd actually shown your knowledge in the post. If you have a good idea how player's are accounted then you should not base your conclusions of whether we paid pittance or not, whether Bayern ripped us of or not on a transfer fee. That's just wrong, that's not how things work. And you should know better.

Now if we calculate the things properly i think it's a pretty decent theory that Munich did rip us of and we massively overpaid for Schweinsteiger. He was on a last year, with a huge salary with fitness and injury concerns, also as i am sure you are aware, but i will point it for other's users benefit, he was not on Munich's books in terms of financial asset, since he was homegrown, his original cost was zero. So any money Munich does make on his transfer is pure profit. Now we sold RVP for twice as little, player with same problems, age etc. And we sold him at a book value, so with zero profit, maybe even a loss if we consider his singing fees and bonuses, i don't know whether we paid those. Looks like we did partially because loss of 7m (our player trading loss for the summer of 2015) is too much for Di Maria's transfer alone. Anyway the 3-4m pounds is much fairer price. 6-7 is over-payment definitely. That's my opinion based on other similar transfers. But that's concerning whether Bayern ripped us off or not. As you can see, at the very least it's a 50-50. There could be a case for saying that Munich got themselves a great deal.
But whether he was a big investment and a major flop or not, there can be little discussion there. And saying that 7m transfer fee proves that he was not a flop is a very simplistic and inaccurate thing to say, especially for someone who deals with financial side of running things. Because his salary alone, even if we don't buy the story that it is over 200k a week, it still obviously huge, makes Schweinsteiger a rather expensive players for our accounts.
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,711
What other past-it player will Ed come up with next that looks good on paper. Ibrahimovitch? Pele? Bobby Moore?
 

buckooo1978

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
13,767
hard luck Bastian.....

could be a blessing in disguise - the management team, whoever that might be, need to be well aware the only two midfield players we have that we can rely on are Herrera and Schneiderlein

in the summer Fellaini will hopefully be sold, Carrick should perhaps move on and I'm not expecting Bastian to be fit for a prolonged period

we need to top quality signings in there..... a playmaker and a leader would be great
 

::sonny::

Full Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
17,868
Location
Milan
Manchester United's new signing Bastian Schweinsteiger has not been fully fit for three years, claims his former boss Pep Guardiola.



Bastian Schweinsteiger played just 15 times last season for Bayern

He is a top, top player. Unfortunately, during the last three years he was never in good condition.
 

Woodzy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
14,765
Location
Cardiff
Was delighted when we signed him but looks like this gamble didn't pay off. With that being said, it wasn't the biggest gamble to begin with.

With him and Carrick all but done, it looks like signing another CM should be high on the wish list this summer.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,365
Real shame, he was just about to be able to start a game after seemingly ages out!
Always the sods law way though.

Carrick and Schneidy will have to see us through then
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
Bloody hell lads. Hope he recovers soon. He's still our player you ungrateful sods.
 

LuisNaniencia

Sky Sports called my bluff
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
10,145
Location
271.5 miles from Old Trafford
It'd bad news but maybe not the worst timing. He will miss the end of this dead season but will have all summer to recover and get fit.

Is it likely there would be any terms in his contract or insurances etc for if he gets a major injury? Would seem sensible if there was.
 

shamans

Thinks you can get an STD from flirting.
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
18,226
Location
Constantly at the STD clinic.
So frustrating, we just don't get any luck do we?
You blame it on luck when it happens in one season. These injuries have been going for maybe four years now. Just because we haven't addressed the issue doesn't means we're "unlucky". We have only ourselves to blame.