Summer Transfer Tweets 2016

[Damien]

Gibson only signed a new contract in June (was about a week before Koeman was officially confirmed so you'd assume they got his thoughts).

 

[shabadu84]

I remember when people were upset when we got rid of Cleverley.

I think you're thinking of Welbeck. Can't remember too much uproar about Cleverley.

 

[Wednesday at Stoke]

I remember when people were upset when we got rid of Cleverley.

Can't think of many, people were ready drive him down to Villa after the Moyes nightmare.

 

[RedMachine03]

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

 

[RedMachine03]

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

 

[izec]

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

Pay it Everton, would like to see him in the PL

 

[Scorpy]

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

 

[roonster09]

Considering the prices that are quoted for decent players we haven't overpaid for Pogba.

 

[TJSF]

Bonkers that City spent so much on him

They didn't scout him appropriately and thought we just walked into the Premier League. Was error prone in Portugal especially in 2013-14 season.

 

[Adnandos]

I remember when people were upset when we got rid of Cleverley.

I don't

 

[TJSF]

Maybe that's why they've moved on to Sissoko.

Brahimi would have been an excellent buy.

Actually no, did great until AFCON 2015, intermittent after that. Porto getting 40M on him would be their best deal since Mangala...As hyped as fecked.

 

[Andy_Cole]

I remember when people were upset when we got rid of Cleverley.

I don't remember one fan who was upset. Best business LVG did.

 

[RedMachine03]

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

 

[vodrake]

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

Three year loan? That's a thing?

 

[Berbaclass]

Three years

 

[J-Stander]

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

Italian clubs fecking love a loan deal.

 

[charlenefan]

Fecking hell the definition of a waste of money. He'll leave of a free transfer having barely ever played for Chelsea

 

[Wednesday at Stoke]

3 year loan is basically saying we bought him but there is no return policy so you can use him if you want to.

 

[anant]

3 year loan!! Sell him and get some money rather

 

[VanHaal'sRedArmy]

Three year loan? That's a thing?

More like a car lease.

 

[Hed Zitin]

Three year loan.

 

[senorgregster]

what on earth?

 

[F1D]

Juventus Football Club can today confirm that an agreement has been reached with Chelsea for the loan of Juan Guillermo Cuadrado Bello until 30 June 2019, for an annual consideration of €5 million.

Juventus has the right to acquire the player on a permanent basis, or will be obliged to upon the achievement of agreed team results during the loan period, for a fee of €25 million, payable in three financial years, minus the loan fees already paid.

Should Juventus achieve certain sporting results during the player’s contract of employment, the club will owe Chelsea an additional €4 million in contingent payments.

http://www.juventus.com/en/news/news/2016/-cuadrado-returns-to-juventus-.php

Sorry for posting this statement, I don't know about you but my head started to ache reading this, typical from Juventus.

 

[Truedevil]

How does a three fecking year loan make sense financially for Chelsea? They're basically giving him away for free when surely Juve would have been able to pay them a few millions.

Edit: So they do get a few millions afterall, but still a weird transfer.

 

[iammemphis]

Chelsea probably subsidising his wages for all that time aswell

 

[Scorpy]

This is fecking hilarious

 

[prateik]

So its basically a loan fee of 5m euros each year for 3 years... and they can sign the player for 25m (- the loan fee) if they want.

 

[duffer]

Fecking hell the definition of a waste of money. He'll leave of a free transfer having barely ever played for Chelsea

We'll have made a profit on him, given the money we get from loaning him out.

 

[Damien]

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

FINALLY

 

[Zoo]

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

 

[Scorpy]

Why would Juventus take advantage of the 25 million euros option when his Chelsea deal expires at the end of his loan and they can agree a pre-contract with him in January 2019?

Maybe I'm missing something, but it doesn't make much sense.

 

[Nighteyes]

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

Valencia's shite.

 

[RedMachine03]

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

 

[KiD MoYeS]

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

FINALLY

Our #Pogback campaign has really changed transfer announcements.

 

[RedMachine03]

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

 

[paulscholes18]

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

Never seen a 3 year loan deal, very good for Juve considering his age

 

[Zoo]

Valencia's shite.

Yep Everton fans are not happy with this at all.

 

[Damien]

Our #Pogback campaign has really changed transfer announcements.

Yeah these played the long game, taking over a month to do the deal just so they could put the montage together.

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

 

[prateik]

Why would Juventus take advantage of the 25 million euros option when his Chelsea deal expires at the end of his loan and they can agree a pre-contract with him in January 2019?

Maybe I'm missing something, but it doesn't make much sense.

Apparently triggered by appearances.. If he plays a certain number of games, they have to sign him.

 

[Classical Mechanic]

How does a three fecking year loan make sense financially for Chelsea? They're basically giving him away for free when surely Juve would have been able to pay them a few millions.

Edit: So they do get a few millions afterall, but still a weird transfer.

He is probably on £120 - 150k a year so it would cost them millions each year to have him at the club or they can get money back on him. If Juve are the only team seriously in for him the hold all the aces.