- Joined
- Jun 27, 2014
- Messages
- 171
Godin.
Godin.
The 'almost' manI have never seen the OX make a decent strike.
It's painful seeing him being compared to Lingard. He's not playing the same positon as Lingard, he's not a similar player to Lingard. I question just how much people have actually seen of him when they keep making this comparison.I'm not a fan.
Firstly Lingard can be a match winner with his strikes, I have never seen the OX make a decent strike.
He seems to be good going past a player or two yet rarely finishes a move and I'm not sure his distribution is anything special either.
I would be interested to see if clubs outside the top 6 would come in for him, perhaps Everton if Barkley moves on.
Am I watching a Pogba highlights reel from this season?The 'almost' man
This could be said for quite a few Arsenal players, some of which improved their injury record at other clubs. Just look at Wilshere and Fabregas for example.I like him.
It's a shame he's so injury prone because he is a very good footballer
Last year of contract, but english and selling to a top 4 rival, I'd guess 20-25m. Which isn't terrible. He's been one of their better players this season from what I've seen, and could still improve a lot if he's allowed to settle on a position.If it's true he'd better not be expensive. And he better not be as brainless as Ibe.
He's not nearly as bad as Ibe and Klopp will improve him. Great move for him and you imhoIf it's true he'd better not be expensive. And he better not be as brainless as Ibe.
I don't think he's bothered by money. Seems like the type who wants to win things.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I really don't know what's worse, Oxlade offered £180k or him turning it down.
He's as bad as Lingard when it comes to putting figures on board.I don't think he's bothered by money. Seems like the type who wants to win things.
Would like to see us get him and lose Lingard.
3 FA cups do not count?I don't think he's bothered by money. Seems like the type who wants to win things.
Would like to see us get him and lose Lingard.
Ox is much better ball carrier, a fighter who tends to do well in big games, much pacier and has more potential.He's as bad as Lingard when it comes to putting figures on board.
Actually, he's worse. Lingard popped up with an useful goal now and then in actual big games.
And don't forget, countless Emirates Cups...3 FA cups do not count?
Wow, I thought this was off but he has indeed scored just 9 goals for Arsenal in the league in 130 appearances, 20 in all competitions in nearly 200 games (skewed by scoring 5 in 11 League Cup games). That's a horrific return.What exactly does he do?
This is his 7th PL season. 9 goals, 14 assists.
He is decent.. basically their Lingard. Looks busy, does little. Good squad option.
He is home grown and top teams need players good enough to be in their squad who are home grown.
Thats the only reason players like him get that sort of money.