The question comes down to whether you can hold onto him until then.
Kane is a fantastic player, but as a traditional type of striker I don't think he would suit the style of play of Madrid or Barca. I do t think Pep is too bothered about Aguero - at the moment I think that's his most likely destination. But all the top team all have decent strikers, so I don't see anyone even making a move for him at the moment.
What about Jesus, unless you can see City permanently going with two strikers?
Unfortunately I think that he would suit Madrid superbly, why do you feel he wouldn't?
Jesus has been fantastic, but still such a young player, you couldn't rely on him as their sole forward. Kane would pretty much guarantee 25-30 goals a season.
He would be bought to displace Benzema - and whilst Kane is clearly the better player, Benzema does so much to make the team tick and he's not the main man, which Kane should expect to be. Whilst Ronaldo is there, I can't see it working. But given the ages of Benzema be Ronaldo, perhaps Kane could be the right player in a couple of years.
Top class striker no doubt. Looking forward to the day he signs for United.
Not that I think it'll ever happen, but as I'm bored I'll entertain the thought. Do you think him and Lukaku could play together?
Incorporating the pair of them in the same team when we predominantly play a 1 striker system would of course be... awkward. Were we to ever switch to a 352, which Jose has lined us up in on various occasions over the summer and In the league cup this season, then a Kane - Lukaku striker partnership could be incredible.
Same can be said about Lukaku but they do the most thing difficult in football well.
Nelson, Churchill, Aristotle, Lincoln, Shakespeare, Einstein, Washington, Napoleon, Jefferson, Jesus ......and oooh nearly forgot, Harry Kane
Actually, Pep, it's 5 this week.
I think he meant every game. Have to say he's some talent you have there.
Kane is more dangerous than Van Nistelrooy. Ruud scored one goal from outside the penalty area once in his career, while Kane regularly smashes them in.
Slightly off topic, but I would consider Kane a better man than any on that list who are responsible for thousands of deaths.Nelson, Churchill, Aristotle, Lincoln, Shakespeare, Einstein, Washington, Napoleon, Jefferson, Jesus ......and oooh nearly forgot, Harry Kane
And yet you've fallen behind United, Chelsea and City after your record high finish in the premier league. Even after you've finished your stadium you still won't be able to compete financially with those aforementioned clubs.
Additional match day income isn't going to come even close to closing the financial gulf you have with the big clubs. And that debt still needs to be serviced.
Madrid is my only real fear, mainly due to their head turning capabilities. I only hope he looks at Bale as an example, they are in my opinion a horrible club, rotten to the core and thinks "no il stay where I am". I honestly think he would score as much if not more than Messi and Ronaldo in Spain. I'm not saying he's as technically as good a player but he would own La Liga. I just wish the media would praise Kane's locality more than they do, it's so refreshing to hear a player like Kane over the childishness of Neymar etc.
Are you seriously talking about the first 7 games of this season (and even if you are we're above Chelsea in the current table)? If so, it's a joke to base anything much on that. And you ignore clubs like Liverpool and Arsenal, who also out-spend Spurs.
Give it time, plenty of Gooners will suffer in the next couple of years and then who knows how the Spurs fans will respond when Kane does leave.
Match day income will be only one of the increased income streams accruing to Spurs from the new stadium complex. In a few years from now I expect our income to exceed that of Liverpool, with Chelsea not far ahead.
I really like Kane but I think you're being very harsh on Lukaku.
Getting abit ahead of yourself there, he's only just joined CityNelson, Churchill, Aristotle, Lincoln, Shakespeare, Einstein, Washington, Napoleon, Jefferson, Jesus ......and oooh nearly forgot, Harry Kane
I'm being harsh, but I'm really a fan of Lukaku, but here's my point:
So? Liverpool don't have great income compared to the big boys. And Chelsea are backed by a sugar daddy, so can offset significant costs into infrastructure etc, without occurring FFP issues, and thus offer much better wages.
His game is, by custom, unfashionable, but it's usefulness is huge. For the record, I actually enjoy watching him play. Straightforward, unpretentious, clean... these are the words I'd associate with his style.
I think I know where you are coming from but those quoted are recognised as the "greatest", not better.
I must be imagining Chelsea winning the league last season then, unless you finished higher than first? In terms of playing quality it's obvious too. The title will end up at either of the Manchester clubs or at Chelsea. I, know it, you know it, everyone knows it.
If he looked at Bale as an example don't you think the three Champions Leagues might be a bit more influential than a bit of booing?
