Your display and explanation contradict themselves. That's the 3-4-1-2 we usually use with 3 at the back. But Pogba's never in that position, more Lingard, Sánchez or even Mata.
3412, 352, same thing. I explained that Pogba would be on the left of Matic and Sanchez in number 10 position as well.
You explained but then put him in a different position in the display. Not the same thing at all. Also, different from 3-4-3, which could also happen.
I wanted to show Pogba as the more progressive midfielder and I explained it anyway. Defend as a 3 man midfield and Sanchez dropping in, attack with Pogba being the progressive man and Sanchez obviously joining with Lukaku.
4 at the back worries me because of the position Salah picks up in between fullback and CB. Their RB also gives them width which can drag our fullback away as well. We could get our fullback to tuck in and have our LW just follow TAA.
The setup to start the City game was awful. Suggest you watch the first 30mins as it was Rojo/Snalling hoofing it to their CBs. After we conceded we started playing football and actually did well trying but the original setup was awful and we need a smarter strategy to counter pressing than hoofing it for Lukaku to chase. Sometimes our plan B puts our plan A to shame
But is McTominay adequate for this game in a midfield three? He disappointed a lot, specially in attack, in that half against Palace. I wish Carrick could play here in a midfield three.
Sánchez and Martial won't do that properly, will they? Nor Mata on the other side. Rashford would, but Mourinho might not want to waste him in the cagey first part of the game.
Nobody's saying it was pretty or that it worked, just that Mourinho probably still believes in it, even without Fellaini's headers and chest control.
We don't have any better options. As much as I value Carrick I will trust Scott more than a 36 years old midfielder who hardly played this season.
Nah, that would be too easy and risky, not the Mourinho style.
One thing is to be dominated, sit back and give the respect to to the midfield containing the likes of D.Silva, KDB, Fernardinho, Gundogan...Another is to be afraid of that shower above in Ox, Henderson and Can - honestly we should take the game to them no two way about it.
In a 1-3 defeat for United.
Then we comeback win 4-3 at the final 10 minutes.No mention of Martial so far.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Jose won't change his approach regardless of media pressure. I feel Klopp is worried about our attack hence why he took a dig at our playing style last week. He knows very well that if we sit deep his team can't score against us so he's trying to get a reaction from Jose and team to come out and attack so they take advantage of any gaps left behind. Our approach at Anfield this season shows this. A 0-0 draw but more importantly Klopp didn't make any attacking changes to take the risk to win the game. He was just as negative with his tactics as we were which shows that he's scared of our attack.
You'll be disappointed. Expect the same as Chelsea. Poor first half solid display with some scares, then…
He did change his approach in the recent Spurs game and we got battered so I think that will reinforce his defensive strategy for the game.
That shower are the only team to have beaten Man City in the league this season. A classic case of the whole being more than the sum of its parts
Just because they didn't commit with 10 men camped in our half doesn't mean they played defensive. They had a fair go at it and it was nothing like our gameplan on the day
.Except that shower were at home and lost 4 -0 away.
5-0 and down to 10 men for the majority of the match. We also had Mignolet in goal, Klavan and Matip as CB's and Moreno at LB.
They had more possession than us but didn't take enough risks to win the game. Klopp could've changed one of his midfielders and try and open up a bit but he didn't want to lose that stability. A draw was the fair result.
Feel like you're repeating what Jose said. He gambled on them throwing on more attackers so we could counter. They didn't. But that doesn't mean they weren't already attacking in the first place. It just means they didn't go gung ho, which isn't quite the same as saying they played defensively. Just because Klopp didn't resort to his naive attacking ways doesn't mean he defended. True he was cautious but only by his own standards
More or less. Maybe Milner will come in for Henderson and Lovren/Gomez for Arnold/Matip.
We didn't really sit back last year either, being more reserved doesn't equate to parking the bus. It was more akin to how you guys play against the smaller sides regularly and given you have 2 trophies to show for it, obviously works.
that's what I just said. Did you read what you quoted?
Well, the same applies for us as well.We are pretty strong at home and it would be a cowardly approach to sit back against your midfield.
Fair enough. Can't remember much about that game so no comment there
Ashley Young
Scott McTominay
Eric Bailly
Romelu Lukaku
Chris Smalling
Juan Mata
Nemanja Matic
Craig Pawson
replaced by Jesse Lingard
replaced by Matteo Darmian
replaced by Marouane Fellaini
