Bastian
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2015
- Messages
- 18,593
- Supports
- Mejbri
Yeah, and that the players that he's moved on are playing for poor teams and perform accordingly.He is saying he inherited a shit team, I think.
Yeah, and that the players that he's moved on are playing for poor teams and perform accordingly.He is saying he inherited a shit team, I think.
Because he is in the process of making United less shit. He's not wrong about United being dogshit after Ferguson.I'm getting fed up with this. If we are so shit why doesn't he feck off to PSG.
That it takes more than two years to build a team.What is he saying?
He like I, don't quite understand what you're going on about.What didn't you understand?
Is he?Because he is in the process of making United less shit. He's not wrong about United being dogshit after Ferguson.
He is just explaining how big teams can go out earlier and people should get over it. He's also saying that City have a foundation of players that have bed themselves in longer.What didn't you understand?
It is important but only to a point, those City players have been at the club for a number of years and played at different levels under different managers, it's not like being at a club for a certain amount of time means you automatically start to play better and more expansive football. Having a group that's familiar with each others game may make it easier to impart group styles and philosophies but it's still down to a manager to get them playing a certain way and bringing the best out of those players on an individual and collective level which is something Mourinho has struggled to do.I think he has a bit of a point there. Cohesion/continuity is, imo, the most under rated aspect in all of pro sports. Until United has a consistent starting 11, we will continue to see the ups and downs we have been.
Yes.Is he?
Bingo. This whole narrative doesn’t fit when we lost to a team who shouldn’t have had a chance.The excuse he and people on here are giving would make sense if we were knocked out by a team of superior quality.
Crap enough to adopt those tactics against Sevilla? Not buying it.Truth hurts and jose is telling truth but someone tell jose he is not paid to lecture about how crap we have been since sir alex retired but to improve us. He is doing the same thing that lvg did, feed his own ego at the expense of the club.
I get what he's saying, and I agree that Man City started from a stronger position due to actually having a vision for the way they want the club to play. They've been building that squad for years and Guardiola has benefitted.This will annoy some people, but he is spot on.
So on the basis of that tie, he's not up to the job? That seems to be the popular opinion now. I'm not sure if it helps the team at all for him to come out crying and saying he did a shite job against Sevilla.Bingo. This whole narrative doesn’t fit when we lost to a team who shouldn’t have had a chance.
Thats why I said he is just feeding his own ego at the expense of our club. He has a hug eego but he needs to change and adapt otherwise he will just be another van gaal.Crap enough to adopt those tactics against Sevilla? Not buying it.
Bravo Jose for telling it like it is. Something a big part of our fanbase can't seem to understand.Erm....
Why don't some of his dick suckers answer this?Is he saying the team he has isn't good enough to best Sevilla?
Blessed are the cheese makers..What is he saying?
Sorry but we as fans should also be able to discuss some of the stuff Fergie did during his last years. He's the GOAT but he's also human and did many mistakes and he should be discussed.Because he is in the process of making United less shit. He's not wrong about United being dogshit after Ferguson.
This is spot on.Bravo Jose for telling it like it is. Something a big part of our fanbase can't seem to understand.
He didn't inherite anything close to those players, our best players are those he bought and brought here. The expectations are not close to reality.
Fergie's last years in the market were a disaster, didn't replace Ronaldo, Moyes was a disaster in the market so was Van Gaal, basically it set us back a decade.
Not sure why you are quoting me - but I do agree with what you are saying.Sorry but we as fans should also be able to discuss some of the stuff Fergie did during his last years. He's the GOAT but he's also human and did many mistakes and he should be discussed.
Not replacing Ronaldo, Scholes set us back a decade there is no questions about it. That he let the Glazers pocket the Ronaldo money is unforgivable. That's the reason why Real and Barca are still fighting for CL wins and why we aren't.
And the difference in age/quality between those two lists speaks volumes. Carrick’s finished, Young and Valencia are in decline and only DDG (and arguably Mata) has been an unequivocal success out of the rest of them (under any manager).DDG, Smalling, Valencia, Mata, Young, Carrick - and Martial's been here as long as Sterling's been there. We've got "heritage" too.
Pretty much.No amount of spin can make up for the fact the team he currently has was more than capable of easily winning on Tuesday. Not sure why he can’t just own up to that.
Eloquently put there. How would you feel about him if we'd have progressed and beaten Sevilla?Why don't some of his dick suckers answer this?
Sorry it wasn't aimed at you.Not sure why you are quoting me - but I do agree with what you are saying.