I mean, it's undeniably impressive from a technical standpoint watching what his players do. He clearly obsesses over every little detail so much that it washes off on the players, everything is as planned and when it comes off it looks spectacular.
But the novelty would wear off after a while, even as a fan. For the first season perhaps you'd absolutely love winning at a canter but then it'd quickly turn into groundhog day.
Any team under Pep turns a game into a boring training match. It's not a competition when only one side plays. His fans will say that's not his fault and it's on the competitors to find a way to beat it which is fair enough but my word are any games he's involved in utter borefests.
A huge part of the joy of watching United under SAF was that we usually made it hard for ourselves resulting in many a heart palpitation but some amazing matches and wins. We took for granted the dull, boring easy ones because we had the amazing dramatic wins to make up for them. Imagine a season of never being challenged? feck that.
I wonder if City fans would rather win a game 5-0 with 91% possession or win it in the last minute like the Aguero title win?
That is an interesting point. It is why I think that Klopp's football is much more in line with what we are used as United fans. It's more chaotic and imperfect that it inevitably leads to some proper roller coasters. I think using the term beautiful/entertaining to describe football is generally useless. Guardiola's football is admired and worshiped because from a coaching perspective, it is the most difficult to execute. The general theory of it is relatively straightforward but putting theory into practice is something only he has proven to be able to do. Obviously because of the individual quality required to do that not many coaches had the chance but still, plenty did coach highly talented teams over the past without being able to produce anything close to that level of front foot control that leaves very little to chance whilst still looking to attack at every turn. It is literally the most difficult thing to pull off.
I think how one feels about that level of perfect execution depends on their personality. There are people who just admire excellence. They get off a perfectly executed camera work or script in a film or a solo in a musical piece. those tend to be generally people within those industries whose deep knowledge of the craft enables them to admire the sheer skill it takes to pull it off which is why coaches and people in football are in awe of Guardiola. To others, it is all about the visceral impact. If something provides an emotional ride, it trumps anything and is considered more entertaining and purely fun than any brilliant demonstration of skill.
I personally think when it comes to football, both have a place and have their merit for very different reasons. There is nothing wrong with the "intellectualisation" of the game the way the likes of Guardiola, Cruyff or Sacchi approach it. That's what humans do and an essential part in improving and elevating the game, not to mention give it another dimension. But there is also a place for the way the likes of Fergie or Klopp approach the game. It may be less perfect theoretically but it treats it as the visceral high octane pleasure that many of us fans experience it. Both approaches essentially come from loving different facets of football and there is something beautiful about that.