Pep's Barcelona vs Zidane's Real Madrid

Greatest club side ever?


  • Total voters
    581

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
21,444
That Barca team were a monster, not taking anything away from Real amazing achievement to win 3 in a row but they couldn't have did this between 08-12.

Real are a brilliant side but i'd say United's 2011 side would have had a decent chance against them tonight better than Liverpool anyway, but in 2011 that United side were beat in what looked like a training exercise by Barca. It was sadly never in doubt.
 

JamesB__

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Messages
3,519
Supports
Stoke City
This Madrid side are talented individuals pushing through with a dressing room brimmed with leaders and winners who get results. Barcelona were a unit who’d win games by stamping their football into a side.
——————
Has there been a tougher run-in to a CL final than what Madrid just went through this season?

PSG -> Juventus -> Bayern -> Liverpool

They’re absolute freaks in the CL.
Napoli > Bayern > Atletico > Juve

But when you factor in the group stage, Madrid this season had Spurs and Dortmund to contend with. Great for them to have proved it against the very best, as the Decima route was far easier.
 

marktan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
7,039
That Barca team were a monster, not taking anything away from Real amazing achievement to win 3 in a row but they couldn't have did this between 08-12.

Real are a brilliant side but i'd say United's 2011 side would have had a decent chance against them tonight better than Liverpool anyway, but in 2011 that United side were beat in what looked like a training exercise by Barca. It was sadly never in doubt.
Our 11-12 was pretty bad if I'm being honest with you, we beat a meh Chelsea side in the QFs and spanked a poor Schalke team in the semis. Our line up had Fabio, Park, Chicharito, Valencia, and Giggs in midfield. That team would get destroyed by this Real side.

Even our 08-09 final team was weakened by having Oshea, Park, Giggs and Anderson in the starting 11 (the former who didn't even make the squad in 07-08 and the other 3 who were subs).

We significantly downgraded unfortuantely from the 07-08 team to the 08-09 team and onwards by virtue of new signings and injuries. We were missing Scholes, Tevez, Brown and Hargreaves and it showed.

Also conversely put this Real team in Pep's years instead of the poor Real team then and Barca wouldn't have been as succesful as they were.
 

marktan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
7,039
Barcelona were the most dominant side I've ever seen simply because they made one of our great sides look ordinary, they did lose to Inter at their peak though and that too a 10 men Inter.
Sorry to quote, but that's not true and it does irk me when people say that. Our 07/08 final team was much, much better than our 08/09 team, not too mention the poor 11/12 team. See my post above.
 

Snow

Somewhere down the lane, a licky boom boom down
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
33,580
Location
Lousy Smarch weather
Basically this comparison is a bit like Ronaldo vs Messi. Real have done an incredible job of amassing trophies and have written themselves into the history but between the two you'd have to pick Barcelona/Messi because they're quality just shades it and they've also got the medals to go with it.

Btw it's fine if you disagree with me, I'm not going to debate Ronaldo v Messi and I'm sorry if the thread turns into another comparison because of me but I thought it was an apt comparison.

As for Champions league only then yes the Real team is better than Peps Barca. Overall no for me but you can debate it and not sound mad.
 

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,453
Sorry to quote, but that's not true and it does irk me when people say that. Our 07/08 final team was much, much better than our 08/09 team, not too mention the poor 11/12 team. See my post above.
I was referring to our 08/09 side, not the 10/11 (probably our weakest team to reach the final). There wasn't a huge difference in our 08/09 side compared to the 07/08, core was basically the same and do remember we absolutely cruised our way to a PL title (when there was actual quality in big 4 teams) and a CL final where we were well beaten by that Barca side.

Basically this comparison is a bit like Ronaldo vs Messi. Real have done an incredible job of amassing trophies and have written themselves into the history but between the two you'd have to pick Barcelona/Messi because they're quality just shades it and they've also got the medals to go with it.

Btw it's fine if you disagree with me, I'm not going to debate Ronaldo v Messi and I'm sorry if the thread turns into another comparison because of me but I thought it was an apt comparison.

As for Champions league only then yes the Real team is better than Peps Barca. Overall no for me but you can debate it and not sound mad.
Barca's overall quality of players in XI and play was higher but this Real side is more ruthless, things that are repeated ad nauseam in Messi v Ronaldo thread so it's a very good comparison imo.
 

MVBDX

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
782
Supports
Real Madrid
Pep's Barca can do whatever they want, at the end Zizou's Madrid will get the result.

There are too many rose-tinted glasses looking at Pep's Barca, their away record in CL was simply horrible compared to Madrid.

Also remember the 4 consecutive Clasicos within 2 weeks? Barca won just one out of 4, and that was due to horrible refereeing with Pepe being sent off for a non-challenge on Alves' dive (also another legit goal by Higuain was ruled out in the away match, or that'd have been another win).

Now that Madrid side wasn't nearly as good as Zizou's Madrid, especially last season's version when they were at their peak.
 

Peyroteo

Professional Ronaldo PR Guy
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
10,884
Location
Porto, Portugal
Supports
Sporting CP
Madrid's mental strength and ability to win without playing well should count towards how good they are instead of being an afterthought and judging them purely on how they played on the pitch.

What's happening on the pitch rarely matters for them, this team always seems to find a way to get the result they need.
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,977
Pep's Barca 14 trophies, Madrid under Zidane - 9 trophies.

But it's nonsensical to disregard style. Barca 09/11 would dominate this Madrid team for fun.
Only if you somehow think all trophies are worth the same
 

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,453
Pep's Barca can do whatever they want, at the end Zizou's Madrid will get the result.

There are too many rose-tinted glasses looking at Pep's Barca, their away record in CL was simply horrible compared to Madrid.

Also remember the 4 consecutive Clasicos within 2 weeks? Barca won just one out of 4, and that was due to horrible refereeing with Pepe being sent off for a non-challenge on Alves' dive. And that Madrid side wasn't nearly as good as Zizou's Madrid, especially last season when they were at their peak.
Yeah, not much is spoken about their terrible away record in CL for an all-time great team. I think reason why that side is slightly overrated on this board is because of the way they schooled us in 2 CL Finals.

Madrid's mental strength and ability to win without playing well should count towards how good they are instead of being an afterthought and judging them purely on how they played on the pitch.

What's happening on the pitch rarely matters for them, this team always seems to find a way to get the result they need.
Great point, even in tonight's match despite the intense pressure Liverpool put them early on. They didn't lose their head and start hoofing, displayed lot of composure to hang in there and eventually got into the game more. Even after giving away a cheap equalizer they carried on well, hallmark of a great team.
 

Aboutreika18

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2009
Messages
9,631
Location
Rojo's Bizarre Adventure
Basically this comparison is a bit like Ronaldo vs Messi. Real have done an incredible job of amassing trophies and have written themselves into the history but between the two you'd have to pick Barcelona/Messi because they're quality just shades it and they've also got the medals to go with it.

Btw it's fine if you disagree with me, I'm not going to debate Ronaldo v Messi and I'm sorry if the thread turns into another comparison because of me but I thought it was an apt comparison.

As for Champions league only then yes the Real team is better than Peps Barca. Overall no for me but you can debate it and not sound mad.
The comparison actually works because I think Ronaldo (vs Messi) and Real (vs Barca) have a higher level of determination and greater mentality in each case.

Ronaldo's sheer will to be the best and sheer determination to peg Messi back when it comes to Ballon d'ors and other personal feats and Madrid's sheer will to win even when under huge pressure is something that both Messi and Barca lack.

Even Messi himself recently said that Real are the best team at winning games even when they're struggling.
 

Zen

Full Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
14,625
I put a lot of emphasis on the CL-Double....winning the CL without the League is fine and all, it happens. But when you do it 3 times out of 4, it tells a story of how much luck has played a part, Atletico truly should of split one of their finals, but Madrid did massively outplay Juventus and well yeah Madrid 16/17 team is up there, great team all round....this year was the luckiest CL I've likely ever seen....I mean if the final the luck turned their way with 2 howlers and opponents superstar injured early.

So with that Pep's Barca who for 4 years genuinely tried to win everything and were about 3 games short of playing every game they could of...far superior.

Statistically it won't say so, but that 08/09 team was so so so magic. World of football was barely prepared for it, even if they needed a shade of luck against super anti-football Chelsea to get what they deserved.
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
Trophies aside, Barca were a highly innovative side tactically wise. There is nothing innovative about this Madrid team. They have done extremely well to win 3 CL titles in a row but they haven't changed football one bit. A great team with a GOAT up front. That's all.
 

breakout67

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
9,050
Supports
Man City
Anyone talking about Madrid getting lucky, they should remember a semi final that started the Barcelona dominance.
 

Bojan11

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
33,116
Barca should have won it in 2010. But Pep selling Eto and signing Ibra who didn’t suit his system ended up costing them.
 

FujiVice

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
7,424
They have done extremely well to win 3 CL titles in a row but they haven't changed football one bit.
They've just won three champions leagues in a row. I'd say that pretty much changes things.
 

Dumbat12

New Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Messages
1,468
Barcelona by far. They were completely dominant at their peak. This Real side? Very good, but I can't help but think their CL success has mostly been them having extreme amount of luck in all of 3 of their runs. They didn't dominate matches, they didn't really showcase that much, they just stumbled and stumbled in all of their matches and somehow won.
 

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,467
Supports
Aston Villa
Barca crashed out to 6th place Chelsea in 2012.
That was at the end of the cycle under Pep. 09-11 is the peak years with 10 when Mourinho did a brilliant job on them in the semis. Think they'd have beaten Bayern Munich in the final so they could've easily done three in a row themselves.
 

FujiVice

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
7,424
That was at the end of the cycle under Pep. 09-11 is the peak years with 10 when Mourinho did a brilliant job on them in the semis. Think they'd have beaten Bayern Munich in the final so they could've easily done three in a row themselves.
They should never have gotten to the final in 2009. The biggest example of a con job by the referees I've ever seen.
 

Fenomeno9

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
1,243
Location
USA
IMO, Trophies rank you higher than another team but doesn’t actually mean you are better than that team.
 

breakout67

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
9,050
Supports
Man City
They should never have gotten to the final in 2009. The biggest example of a con job by the referees I've ever seen.
According to an FBI report, A high profile CL game was subject to match fixing in 08/09...makes you wonder.
 

Ban

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
26,022
Location
Zagreb, HR
3 CLs in a row but 2 of them are a bit underwhelming tbh. Especially this one. I still dont know how they did it, they didn't look convincing at all or anything special but they won it. Barcelona on their day looked out of this world. So still Barcelona for me.
 

RMD83

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
827
It’s barca for me. I have never been wow’d by this Madrid team. They have set a record that speaks for itself and you can never take that from them but they are no way the best club team I have seen in my 35 years.
 

MikeKing

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
5,125
Supports
Bournemouth
Trophies aside, Barca were a highly innovative side tactically wise. There is nothing innovative about this Madrid team. They have done extremely well to win 3 CL titles in a row but they haven't changed football one bit. A great team with a GOAT up front. That's all.
In football with almost every club, changes are made from season to season and consistency is of major relevance to success. To not make a change that has negative impact and keep a winning formula over 3 years to win the CL is in fact innovative, as its never been done before. Luck, experience and a surrounding winning mentality combined with a team full of great players that all gel together almost perfectly. It is really impressive to archive this... and i think even more difficult to build and get consistent than Pep or Mourinho's formulas which almost tries to remove luck from the equation.
 

Jim Beam

Gets aroused by men in low socks
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
13,176
Location
All over the place
Barcelona, but I think as time pass by this Madrid team will get more credit than today and will be put at least on the same level. Maybe even higher.

When you win 4 out of 5 with 3 in a row you will go down in history books as one of the best club sides ever. And I am saying it as a person who isn't very fond of Real as a club.
 

SwansonsTache

incontinent sexual deviant & German sausage lover
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
15,563
Location
Norway
Barca, but you can't underestimate how lucky they were to stumble over quite a few GOATish players and the GOAT in one go.

Xavi, Iniesta as two of the best midfielders of all time, Biscuits as the best DM of all time and Messi as the GOAT. Embarassment of riches.
 

Hugh Jass

Shave Dass
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
11,338
Still think Peps Barcelona is the best side ive seen. They were just a machine. Granted we should have done better the first final we played them. But the second final was pure torture by them on us.
 

PvsNP

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
5,513
Zidane has achieved more, but Pep easily had the better side.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
21,444
Our 11-12 was pretty bad if I'm being honest with you, we beat a meh Chelsea side in the QFs and spanked a poor Schalke team in the semis. Our line up had Fabio, Park, Chicharito, Valencia, and Giggs in midfield. That team would get destroyed by this Real side.
Nah not for me mate and i'm talking about 2010-2011 United here. It was still a pretty good side, better than the one Liverpool that played tonight anyway. Rooney, Nani and Valencia in the form of their careers, Hernandez and Berbatov both getting 20+ goals and plenty of experience. Not saying they would beat this Madrid side but they would have had a better chance than a side with the likes of Henderson, Karius, Lalanna and Milner in it.

Also conversely put this Real team in Pep's years instead of the poor Real team then and Barca wouldn't have been as succesful as they were.
Possibly mate yeah, but i don't see how this Madrid side would have beaten that Barca side in 2009 & 2011. That team was just too dominant.
 

Hugh Jass

Shave Dass
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
11,338
If it were Peps Barcelona versus this current Madrid team, would be very interesting to see who would come out on top. In ten games, i would say Barcelona would win six or seven times.
 

Zen

Full Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
14,625
Anyone talking about Madrid getting lucky, they should remember a semi final that started the Barcelona dominance.
Was mentioned in mine bruv. But otherwise throughout that span, they comprehensively deserved it....especially the 10/11 win, with what is still likely Messi's finest hour in the semi in the biggest game of recent memory for both clubs really.

Theres not many CL wins that I don't feel haven't had luck, and as bias as it seems, I believe United have had the worst luck in my lifetime, shitty stuff happening in most exits - except not Sevilla and a couple others of course - but I would say in 08, 09, 11, 15 and 17 you genuinely had the best team in Europe winning....pretty much fairly. Three of those are Barcelona.

And yet Jose's won it twice - despite for me, not winning when he did create the best team in Europe(back to back years with Chelsea 05-06 and Real 2012).

Funny old sport.
 

Walters_19_MuFc

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
29,862
Location
Birmingham
Barcelona were technically the better team and played the better football, but this Madrid team is more efficient. They know how to win games.