Marcus Rashford in talks with Manchester United over new long-term deal

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jacob

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
25,578
Pogba, De Gea and Rashford can have whatever salary they want. The rest should be negotiated.
 

shaky

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
2,515
How anyone can complain about paying under £10m a year wages for a player we'd value at over £100m if he were to leave, I don't know. I'd have thought he could get £250k a week to be honest. It's not as if we could easily replace him with someone better. I'm surprised folk get worked up by this sort of thing, Utd earned about £600m last year. That figure could have been £500m or £700m and none of us would have cared about the difference, yet a few million extra in wages to one of our best players and suddenly it's an issue?
 

Ramshock

CAF Pilib De Brún Translator
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
45,425
Location
Swimming against a tide of idiots and spoofers
Not really, but he's got a sentence in our most popular new singalong song.

Ole’s at the wheel,
Tell me how good does it feel,
We’ve got Sanchez, Paul Pogba and Fred,
Marcus Rashford is Manc born and bred
Doo doo doo doo doo doooo
The greatest of English football
We’ve won it all
De Gea, Rashford and Pogba dont have songs? What about Mata?
 

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,445
Location
Voted the best city in the world
Great news. Tie him down to a nice 6 year deal, if not more.

People scoffing at those wages - how much are young potential like his going for in the market atm? You'd probably be looking at 75m - 100m to replace him - and I'm being conservative.
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,411
De Gea, Rashford and Pogba dont have songs? What about Mata?
De Gea has one. It's "Everywhere you go, always take de gea with you" to the tune of Always take the weather with you.

Pogba doesn't have one, but Mata does:

 

Tiber

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
10,296
Of course. Who would want to miss out on the glory of the Ole era?
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
11,636
Location
DownUnder
I genuinely believed that millennials were kids born post 2000 :nervous::lol:
Imagine being a post millennial, it's like being an after thought. I'd be insisting on Gen Z...
I find it very random that a post millennial can be born in 1997 or 95 as some versions state.
 

Nikelesh Reddy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2017
Messages
1,912
What has he done to warrant 150 grand a week? I don't think even Harry kane is earning that much. Marcus has had a decent few weeks but that's about it.

That Sanchez deal is killing us.
Harry Kanes on 200,000 quid per week....But I think 150,000 may be just about right for Rashford considering the market right now.Will be interesting to see what De Gea and Pogba want from the club...They May want parity with Sanchez....
 

finneh

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
7,318
Good news. The problem in terms of our pay structure is with our squad/backup players (Jones, Rojo, Young, Bailly, Fellaini, Smalling) and with the players who were bought in to be star players but aren't up to the standard that their salary would suggest (Lukaku, Sanchez, Fred, Mata).

Our first XI if you exclude RB and CB which are essentially vacant positions currently (De Gea, Lindelof, Shaw, Matic, Herrera, Pogba, Martial, Rashford, Lingard) are paid exactly what you'd expect for a club like United.

Rashford is firmly in the latter category and should be paid similarly to Martial/Matic and only behind Pogba/De Gea.
 

desirere

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
219
Location
Rijeka
What is Martial's new salary ?

I'd be surprised if Rashford's new deal, when it is eventually agreed, comes much under 200K a week.

Our elite players right now are De Gea, Pogba and to a lesser extent Martial and Rashford. Our top paid players are Sanchez, Pogba, Lukaku (12m according to Football Leaks book), De Gea (10m - 12m), then Matic or Martial, Mata (7.5 - 8).

We are currently paying Lukaku 12m with the possibility of more if he hits difficult goals and assists targets, based on a season for Everton in which he managed a non-penalty goal or assist every 100 mins in the PL. Sanchez's best season for Arsenal, again a non-penalty goal or assist every 100 mins in the PL. Right now, Rashford is matching that goal or assist every 100 mins in the PL, despite a slow start to the season.
Fixed that for you.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,957
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Harry Kanes on 200,000 quid per week....But I think 150,000 may be just about right for Rashford considering the market right now.Will be interesting to see what De Gea and Pogba want from the club...They May want parity with Sanchez....
Rashford's goal to game tally is currently better than Ronaldo's was after the same amount of games for United. We should be doing everything possible to keep the rest of Europe away from one of our prized assets, that can ultimately be one of the best strikers in Europe.

If Rashford goes on to have a 25+ goal season next season no one will question the salary, they'll all be talking about how much he would cost in the current market instead.

Reports are that De Gea wants the same as Sanchez and you can't blame him, he's crucial to us.
 

anant

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Feb 28, 2015
Messages
8,260
Easily worth it. Not even a question. I'd say if required pay him 200k/wk to tie him down here.
As far as concerns regarding wage budget getting out of hand, we should look at offloading Sanchez and Lukaku (especially if he is going to play second fiddle) in addition to the likely departures of Valencia, Darmian, Rojo/Jones
 

Fridge chutney

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
8,970
Don't even care how much we pay him, I honestly don't understand why so many supporters are interested in the financial outlay of the club. We're not in any danger, we have owners who apparently are in it for the money and fans still moan when they spend too much. They can't win.

The shirt means more to Rashford, Lingard too, than anyone else at the club. I don't begrudge them earning what they do when we have other mercenaries that don'd give a shit.
Well said! Also, i would rather this money go to Rashford, who will spend and distribute a lot of his income around Manchester, than to the Glazers. In general I'm fine with a club's money going to players rather than owners.

Better than being in the Arsenal situation where they "can't afford" to sign Ramsey on a new contract.
 

RedDevil@84

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
21,787
Location
USA
Unless there has been a push from Rashford's side, I don't see why the hurry to give him a new contract. Isn't there enough contract situations to already worry about?
Does he have an agent or does his family look into things?
 

Dargonk

Ninja Scout
Scout
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
18,763
Location
Australia
150k doesn't seem like a bad deal for United compared to the wages other people in the squad are getting, and the wages we would likely give to any player we brought in to replace him.
 

In Rainbows

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
6,773
I don't think those wages are bad for Rashford. Trust me, I would be the first to complain about our wages. It's not a problem to give our best players or premier young talents good wages. My problem is paying big wages to players who are lucky to be at United and would not be payed that well at other top 6 clubs.
 

IrishGlen

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2018
Messages
194
I don’t think his agent is doing a good job if he signs for 150k per week - he’s going to be our first choice CF from here on in so he should be getting parity with Lukaku at least!

I don’t necessarily agree with such high figures but that’s what he will expect! I would imagine the English tax carries over to salary too!

As a more general point, the club really need to shift Sanchez as it completely distorts the wage structure. I suppose if you removed Sanchez and the top earners were 1) DDG 2) Pogba 3) Lukaku / Rashford and then Martial @ 200k, that would be hard to argue against! Obviously, the club need to look at the Lukaku situation going forward as 250k for a backup CF isn’t really ideal!
 

SirAF

Ageist
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Messages
37,681
Location
Unless there has been a push from Rashford's side, I don't see why the hurry to give him a new contract. Isn't there enough contract situations to already worry about?
Does he have an agent or does his family look into things?
Transfermarkt says «relatives».
 

Catt

Ole's at the wheel!
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
28,055
Location
Norway
This is good news and I don't think the amount is crazy.
 

Eckers99

Michael Corleone says hello
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
6,117
With each passing game I become more disappointed with myself for not seeing that his poor form was down to Jose and not his own ability. I genuinely doubted he'd live up to his early potential.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,724
It does look like our new policy is just out pay the competition so that they aren't tempted to leave. The big contract we need to make sure we get nailed down in the next few seasons is Pogba.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,928
Location
London
It does look like our new policy is just out pay the competition so that they aren't tempted to leave. The big contract we need to make sure we get nailed down in the next few seasons is Pogba.
We always paid good our top players. Rashford IMO is our fourth best player after Pogba, De Gea and Martial, so 150k/week (after bonuses) is not that much for one of our top players. Signing someone like him, would cost north of 100m, and will be instantly in 200k/week.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,295
Location
...
This is the Sanchez effect then.

We should be paying him like he's still got something to prove, not like he's already made it. It's not like he's going to leave us if we don't break the bank for this contract.
That’s exactly what we are doing, what year are you in? Do you think if he goes on to prove what you hope he will prove that he would ask for £150k a week? He’s getting what he deserves right now, and if he gets even better, he’d get even more.
 

Moonwalker

Full Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2009
Messages
3,821
More penny pinching by the Glazers I see, going with the cheap option as always of extending a contract, instead of just buying a better player, which is what real men do.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,724
We always paid good our top players. Rashford IMO is our fourth best player after Pogba, De Gea and Martial, so 150k/week (after bonuses) is not that much for one of our top players. Signing someone like him, would cost north of 100m, and will be instantly in 200k/week.
Traditionally, attackers get paid more too. I agree about the replacement price, it makes a lot more sense to tie Rashford down to big wages than have to replace him with someone who costs north of £100m.
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
Sign him right now! He is playing great, is young and surely will only get better and better. One of the hottest prospects, there are rumors about Madrid wanting him so we better secure him on a long long deal.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,683
Those are more or less the reported net salaries after tax, though I'm a bit dubious about the exchange rate used in the article as well. The cost to Real Madrid is roughly double that.

UK football pay on the other hand is reported in the press pre-tax. That £150k figure would put him on Kovacic money, and significantly less than Asensio for example. We'll be very lucky to get him for that - especially if there are no increments or release clauses in the contract.

Hopefully we'll get a deal that suits him and us sorted quickly and quietly. I'm sure we will, transfer fees make no economic sense, and Woodward knows economics.
United is known to have the 2nd largest wage bill in the whole world, just below Barca, but above Madrid. So, those numbers might be accurate.

Anyway, with recent bump up on wages, United is solidifying that position as one of the top team in the world (on paying wages).
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,334
Location
Lucilinburhuc
More penny pinching by the Glazers I see, going with the cheap option as always of extending a contract, instead of just buying a better player, which is what real men do.
Yeah, lets buy a young player for 200m and give him 300k per week, thats how it's done. Giving Rashford 150k is too much of a good business
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,957
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Honestly don't get people complaining about his salary?

How much do you think it would cost to sign Mbappe and pay him? If anything Rashford should wait until the end of next season and hold us ransom for a new contract.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,957
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
How anyone can complain about paying under £10m a year wages for a player we'd value at over £100m if he were to leave, I don't know. I'd have thought he could get £250k a week to be honest. It's not as if we could easily replace him with someone better. I'm surprised folk get worked up by this sort of thing, Utd earned about £600m last year. That figure could have been £500m or £700m and none of us would have cared about the difference, yet a few million extra in wages to one of our best players and suddenly it's an issue?
"The games gone..."
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,683
So we won't be top. Barca have added shit loads of players, Madrid will sign lot of players this summer.

In any case, your initial list is just wrong, Sillyseason, Sportskeeda are crap sources who don't even know the difference between gross and net wages.
I put the link from totalsportek. It's literally there.

Anyway, all sources put United as above Real Madrid. On wages. That's even they've just won Champions League 3 times in a row.
 

AndyJ1985

New Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
8,954
Honestly don't get people complaining about his salary?

How much do you think it would cost to sign Mbappe and pay him? If anything Rashford should wait until the end of next season and hold us ransom for a new contract.
Rashford isn't on the same level as Mbappe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.