True, an obsession with "Jewish king's evidence" existed and still exists. But Nazi antisemitism worked categorically different from what Shapiro did there (disgraceful as it is).
Tactical shenanigans aside, in its essence Nazi antisemitism did not seperate between "Good Jews" and "Bad Jews". That's an absolutely fundamental point. There were just Jews, rotten in nature as a collective, and every single one of them. Mankind has to be saved from them in an apocalyptic last stand. That inner logic of Nazi antisemitism (eventually leading to physical extermination) goes back further than the Holocaust, and even Nazism.
Shapiro on the other hand speaks from the standpoint of a virtual Jewish collective and the "Good Jews". That standpoint is incompatible with Nazi antisemitism, where "the Jew" is always an alien. Shapiro basically attacks supposed traitors from his own group, who allegedly undermine collective security, including their own. A better fitting historical comparison might perhaps be the Red Scare and its persecution of "un-American" activities. It's something right out of the authoritarian playbook - Erdogan does it, the Israeli right does it, many others did it and still do. But it's very different from the racial antisemitism of the Nazis.
As I said, read the exchange with that Weinstein dude underneath, I think that makes it clear.
The problem is, when that kind of authoritarian paranoia is acted out in an inner-Jewish context, the rhetoric can quickly resemble antisemitic tropes. There's a ring to "Bad Jew" that "Bad Turk" or "Bad American" doesn't have. Shapiro, attention-seeking demagogue that he is, deliberately played on that ambiguity in this tweet, which is both detestable and dangerous.
So to me, polemical references to antisemitic conspiracy theories (like in many of the twitter comments, or from berbatrick above) can be a very appropriate response to that kind of shit. But serious comparisons beyond that don't work, imo.