Yeah. Reported as £200k most places. Probably a lot more!
Marcus Rashford signs new deal with United | 4yr + 1
- Thread starter littlepeasoup
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik @Rood and Imran @Annihilate Now! start with the good news by celebrating Manchester United Women's emphatic FA Cup win over Spurs at Wembley and the future of manager Marc Skinner.
Then it's the bad news and the ever worsening form of our Men with losses to Arsenal and Palace.
Finally the main debate - ETH Out now or keep him until the end of the season - if not longer. Are you Team Nik or Team Imran?
Nope. Read the Times article it specifically says it's less than half of some of the numbers being reported. Jesus you have it out for him don't you?
Football leaks for Auba.
For sterling search Sterling new contract. bBC and Sammy Lee both reported he earns 300k. There is no single source, have to search for each player.
How much is it?
I disagree, his first two seasons under Mourinho he was far worse, this season he actually had periods where he looked very good. He's definitely improved but he's still very inconsistent, he did seem a bit off after his injury so maybe a bit of time to recover over summer will have benefited him.
Why is it more?
Looks like one more fan who is here to WUM, fecking Wolves fans too
Plenty of future content in this thread i see.
Absolutely great news.
I’m glad he’s signed but that wage...
But I’d rather we overspend on potential like Rashford than some of the other players we’ve been renewing at stupid fees.
But I’d rather we overspend on potential like Rashford than some of the other players we’ve been renewing at stupid fees.
Cause it fits in what he wants to believe.
Reading is hard!!Looks like one more fan who is here to WUM, fecking Wolves fans too
Of course.
Or he is here to troll.
Keep reading 'Speaks like a fan', like that's some kind of achievement...
He might 'Speak like a fan', but he plays like an upper mid-table striker, and has just haggled the club up to 200,000 a week...
We've just put Marcus Rashford on the same wage as Harry fecking Kane...!
Paying premium wage for a player that wouldn't start (as a CF) at any other top 6 club.
To be blunt - I think it's yet more awful business from the club.
He might 'Speak like a fan', but he plays like an upper mid-table striker, and has just haggled the club up to 200,000 a week...
We've just put Marcus Rashford on the same wage as Harry fecking Kane...!
Paying premium wage for a player that wouldn't start (as a CF) at any other top 6 club.
To be blunt - I think it's yet more awful business from the club.
There's a very thin line on this site of who's here to troll and who's actually interested in talking about Manchester United.
So his basic is less than £200k according to that, but with a bunch of performance related bonuses like Rashford has.
BBC reported Rashford earns 200k, Henry Winter who interviewed Rashford reported his salary is way less and around half of what's reported (reports of 300k including bonuses)
Absolutely delighted with this
One of my favourite players
One of my favourite players
Woodward.
I really don't. I like him a lot as a player and really want to see him do well. But I disagree that rewarding him for where he is currently with a bumper new contract is the way to help him improve.
Yeah losing him on free transfer is the way to go.
Btw will you keep ignoring what's posted by Henry Winter just because it doesn't fit your agenda?
Yeah I'm not believing 300k, I'm believing 200k + bonuses. And if thats the case then as I said he'd have to go up a few levels to match the other players on similar deals
600k a week
I heard it is 1000 for every person bitching here about it. So yeah, it was reported as 200k. But probably a lot more!
BBc didn't report 200k plus bonuses, they reported just 200k, just like how they reported Sterling earns 300k. If they are consistent then its including bonuses for both.
The bonuses would probably include club success too. We win the league, he gets more cash stuff like that.
I would assume they just report the basic guaranteed wages and not the bonuses
So sterling is on 300k basic?
Yeah of course. Although from the football leaks he's talking about, a bunch of players have money for things like 25 or 35 goals and assists combined. Something like that could be in there too and might help him go up the levels.
I dont know, but its hard to know ahead of time what someone is going to be paid in bonuses. If they knew that already they wouldnt be bonuses.
1. Kane is probably the most poorly compensated footballer on the planet for his level. He'd be on astronomical wages if he moved to a United, Real, Juve, City type club but he hasn't. Using him as a yardstick is absolutely irrelevant.
2. 'Premium wages' is Sanchez, this is not that. It's a huge wage but I'm sure the club is competent regarding managing their own financials.
3. We will be overpaying for talent until we return to the top, expect more of this. Completely normal, although a bit shit.
We signed a £75m striker in Lukaku who was supposed to be about as 'plug and play' as you could hope for and he's really disappointed. Big names and reputations have meant very little recently when players have come here. Who's out there that would realistically a) come to us and b) be a genuine upgrade on Rashford. Signing our current No9 onto a long term contract is hardly 'bad business'
True, would be great for us if he does get paid all of his bonuses.
But if he doesn't improve his levels, he's not good enough for you. His goal return is only slightly better than Welbeck's was at the moment, that's not good enough!! He had 2 years left after the 1 year extension was triggered so he should have been given this year to prove himself worthy of a new bumper contract (which in my opinion he hasn't yet done).
I wasn't aware of what Henry Winter was saying, just looked. I'm not calling Rashford a mercenary, I'm criticising the club (Woodward) for dishing out undeserved bumper contracts. Just a case of protecting player's value again without a thought of what is best for the team.
Having player with undecided future is not good for player or team. Rashford was among the lowest paid players in the team and he is first choice player for us.
Silly to compare goal return of a CF and LW. Rashford barely played as a striker, all his career except few games are as winger.
Also Henry Winter's article isn't about calling him mercenary, it's about how the reported wages are completely wrong.
You would rather let him leave on a free ?
It is unfortunate that the club has done this, but if he was going to renew it was always going to be 200k or plus.
Martial is on the same and Luke Shaw is on £195k so there is no chance Rashy will be getting less.
He is better than Martial and shows fight for the club.
Great! £200k a week plus bonuses for a kid who has never scored more than 10 league goals in a season. And has never scored more than 13 league goals in a season.
To get that kind of money, he would have to be at least 20 goals in all competitions by now.
I've seen few teenage sensations come along in my time ( Owen, Rooney, Mbappe, Ronaldo (both), Messi). All of these so called teenage / early twenties attackers had 15 plus goal season or a few by the time they Rashy's age.
Based on his record and games to goal ratio he is closer to Francis Jeffers who had 33% goals/games ratio at Everton before moving to Arsenal (20 goals in 60 games).
Our Rashy has 45 goals / 170 games. Which is 26% ratio.
He better prove himself to score more than 20 goals this season with those wages. That's all I say!
To get that kind of money, he would have to be at least 20 goals in all competitions by now.
I've seen few teenage sensations come along in my time ( Owen, Rooney, Mbappe, Ronaldo (both), Messi). All of these so called teenage / early twenties attackers had 15 plus goal season or a few by the time they Rashy's age.
Based on his record and games to goal ratio he is closer to Francis Jeffers who had 33% goals/games ratio at Everton before moving to Arsenal (20 goals in 60 games).
Our Rashy has 45 goals / 170 games. Which is 26% ratio.
He better prove himself to score more than 20 goals this season with those wages. That's all I say!
Yeah, I can't find the article but he's probably referring to the reported £300k! It's more likely £200k, which is still too much!
But when you're paying Sanchez nearly double that, it scuppers all your future contract negotiations.
Yeah compare Striker with player who played most of his games as winger and also as a sub. Thats a valid comparison.