Nicolas Pepe - Signs for Arsenal

Status
Not open for further replies.

bucky

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
9,599
Guys this was never happening, our clearly very smart and totally not braindead decision makers surely knew that to be successful you must neglect a position for a nearly a decade. The right wing doesn't matter you fools, we should keep letting this massive whole in our team continue to exist. Have fun Arsenal you idiots!!!! Don't you know a Right Winger is a very bad unimportant position you crayon eaters!!! I am glad we are ignoring this spot again and a top four rival is wasting time signing a definitely not useful player for a very redundant part of the team :lol::D
Get a grip.
 

Ole’s Wheel

New Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2019
Messages
649
Supports
CR7
Never mind, I retract my previous posts from weeks/months past about wanting Pepe.

The more I think of this rationally, the more it clears itself up. Despite being a scorer, Pepe is overrated by us and not as good as he really is just because we think he’d fix a RW need for us & is the best available target left in the market. He’s a good player but I wouldn’t say world class let alone even great and definitely not worth £70m. He has a few top qualities but no where near the complete package.

First hearing about him last season I was excited but the more you watch him from a neutral perspective, the more you realize his flaws and know that he catches your attention once every handful of games and does not have the consistency. Even watching his AFCON performances, there’s nothing special...I think it makes much more sense to just wait a year and go for Sancho then who brings a lot more to the table. Sancho around £100m or whatever >> Pepe at £70m. An extra 20%-30% for the completer player is the smart investment to make. A bit of patience goes a long ways. Pepe would just have that forced feel to it just to say we did what we could to address the RW need to get it done and dusted with. Rather wait it out and let James/the young core/even Alexis rotate this year to show what they got and make a decision next summer.
:cool:
 

beingshe7don

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2016
Messages
2,735
Never mind, I retract my previous posts from weeks/months past about wanting Pepe.

The more I think of this rationally, the more it clears itself up. Despite being a scorer, Pepe is overrated by us and not as good as he really is just because we think he’d fix a RW need for us & is the best available target left in the market. He’s a good player but I wouldn’t say world class let alone even great and definitely not worth £70m. He has a few top qualities but no where near the complete package.

First hearing about him last season I was excited but the more you watch him from a neutral perspective, the more you realize his flaws and know that he catches your attention once every handful of games and does not have the consistency. Even watching his AFCON performances, there’s nothing special...I think it makes much more sense to just wait a year and go for Sancho then who brings a lot more to the table. Sancho around £100m or whatever >> Pepe at £70m. An extra 20%-30% for the completer player is the smart investment to make. A bit of patience goes a long ways. Pepe would just have that forced feel to it just to say we did what we could to address the RW need to get it done and dusted with. Rather wait it out and let James/the young core/even Alexis rotate this year to show what they got and make a decision next summer.
Sounds like a post of sour grapes since Arsenal will be getting him. No guarantee that Sancho will come here next season. In fact, I'll guarantee you that he WILL NOT join United at all. Pepe is a good player and we again let him get away like we did with Tielemans, Ndombele and now Pepe.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
44,101
If the reported price of £72m is true thats insane, more than double what Chelsea paid for Hazard.
 

cesc's_mullet

Get a haircut Hippy!
Joined
Apr 9, 2006
Messages
27,066
Supports
Arsenal
If the reported price of £72m is true thats insane, more than double what Chelsea paid for Hazard.
How many years are in between though? Pointless comparison given the change in the market. Or should we compare Pogba with Vieira?

Crazy money still.
 

Denis79

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
7,779
If the reported price of £72m is true thats insane, more than double what Chelsea paid for Hazard.
Prices are inflated beyond belief, good signing for them though. They are having a decent window it seems. Thought they had no funds because they missed the CL?
 

beingshe7don

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2016
Messages
2,735
If the reported price of £72m is true thats insane, more than double what Chelsea paid for Hazard.
Actually not really... if he can deliver 15 odd goals in the league this coming season, that'll be a huge bargain.... PS: 75m is the new 35m... I mean Maguire is going for 80m.... without achieving anything...
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
44,101
Of course there's inflation but it was in the same decade at least. Anyways, that's Hazard money and then some, must be really confident about him.
 

Che Guevara

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
804
Location
Wolverhampton
Supports
Celtic
If the reported price of £72m is true thats insane, more than double what Chelsea paid for Hazard.
Comparing a 2012 fee with a 2019 fee. Besides, Arsenal are paying in instalments. Pepe was the fourth highest scorer in all Europe last season, and second highest scorer in Ligue 1 ahead of Neymar and Cavani, and he is only 24. Very good deal for Arsenal.
 

Touseef

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
390
Which is not his point. His point is that a guy like Kroenke shows more ambition on the market than we are. Which is a fair point and very very worrying.
How is that though. If we sign up Bruno and maguire, we'd have easily shown more ambition than them. They're not the right barometer to gauge our ambitions and ofcourse the glazers can spend more but let's not go overboard with the hyperbole.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
Martial for me is a superior dribbler to Pepe and can operate comortably in tight spaces due to being better on a technical level.

His goal scoring for me is misleading due to him not being the quickest or having good close control whilst dribbling. It's easy to see why Bayern feel he needs space to be effective if German reports are to be believed.

I don't think he'll ever become a 'beast' like you put it. But he could become a effective player for Arsenal with a big goal threat depending on how he's deployed by Emery.

Sancho and Chiesa are far superior players to Pepe on the flanks IMO and should be prioritized even if we have to wait a year.
We can always prioritize Sancho like we prioritized De Ligt, but Sancho may never prioritize us, when he became available there will be many big clubs interest in him. And our right side need reinforcement badly.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,798
Location
india
It's just fubby that even Arsenal manage to make a big RW signing before us.
 

ManRed

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
2,086
Location
London
Have we learnt nothing in the past few years. How do we manage to go into the league yet again without a RW amazes me.
 

cesc's_mullet

Get a haircut Hippy!
Joined
Apr 9, 2006
Messages
27,066
Supports
Arsenal
Guys this was never happening, our clearly very smart and totally not braindead decision makers surely knew that to be successful you must neglect a position for a nearly a decade. The right wing doesn't matter you fools, we should keep letting this massive whole in our team continue to exist. Have fun Arsenal you idiots!!!! Don't you know a Right Winger is a very bad unimportant position you crayon eaters!!! I am glad we are ignoring this spot again and a top four rival is wasting time signing a definitely not useful player for a very redundant part of the team :lol::D
All good man. Once Hawks announce Coniglio is coming as a FA, and that we are trading for Whitfield who wants to play for his boyhood club, then all the pain will be washed away.

Also, are you on BigFooty?
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,798
Location
india

TheRedHearted

Full Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
2,674
Location
New York, NY
Have we learnt nothing in the past few years. How do we manage to go into the league yet again without a RW amazes me.
Seems like it. It’s simple- when you don’t have a player for a position, you buy one. Unless Ole would much rather go with Rashford there (or one of the young guys) and Martial in the center. I very much hope so
 

Hawks2008

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
4,913
Location
Melbz
All good man. Once Hawks announce Coniglio is coming as a FA, and that we are trading for Whitfield who wants to play for his boyhood club, then all the pain will be washed away.

Also, are you on BigFooty?
Yeah the GWS raid should be good, though I got a feeling cogs will take the big money from Carlton. I am on BigFooty but I mostly just lurk.
 

In Rainbows

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
6,762
Sounds like a post of sour grapes since Arsenal will be getting him. No guarantee that Sancho will come here next season. In fact, I'll guarantee you that he WILL NOT join United at all. Pepe is a good player and we again let him get away like we did with Tielemans, Ndombele and now Pepe.
So there is no guarantee he will join United, but you guarantee he won't join United? The only one speaking nonsense is you. I don't think others have ever said Sancho is a guarantee next season. People are simply saying if the strategy is to go for Sancho, people would rather do that then just end up with a poor man's version of Sancho.

The reason for that is simple. Sancho clearly prioritizes his career above all else. This is why he chose to leave City for Dortmund as he thought it was best for his development. If United had Pepe, United would likely not go for Sancho and Sancho would or rather, could have reservations about joining United where he isn't guaranteed to start. From the rumors it seems that Sancho wants to be part of a CL squad. Maybe Pepe guarantees that part, but then again, if that is the case, why go for Sancho when there would be other pressing needs? As of right now our right wing is much improved from simply having AWB. It's not like the right side problem was only due to not having a winger. The problem was two-fold.

What clubs are a threat to sign Sancho next season? It won't be Arsenal as they don't spend that much. It won't be Spurs. It's probably not City as City have too much competition and I don't think Sancho won't take that into account. Its probably Chelsea that is the biggest threat. They just lost Hazard and have Lampard as their manager. It could very easily become a bad situation.

If that's the case, I think United have a great shot at him.
 

Bondi77

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
7,357
I am just a bit puzzled as to why Arsenal are prepared to pay over 70mil for Pepe and yet supposedly only bid 40mil for Zaha who admits to being a huge Arsenal fan; Maybe they were put off by Palace playing hardball with us on AWB but you would have to think Zaha would hit the ground running and a bid of 60mil would have been worth a try.
 

tinfish

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2013
Messages
677
Location
Shanghai
Supports
Arsenal
I am just a bit puzzled as to why Arsenal are prepared to pay over 70mil for Pepe and yet supposedly only bid 40mil for Zaha who admits to being a huge Arsenal fan; Maybe they were put off by Palace playing hardball with us on AWB but you would have to think Zaha would hit the ground running and a bid of 60mil would have been worth a try.
Everyone keeps overlooking the fact that Crystal Palace wanted a larger fee up front. We had too many technical add-ons, such as qualifying for the champions league etc. A club like Palace are too cash rich to accept a structured transfer.

For Pepe however, rumor says it's something like £14 million per year for 5 years. Arsenal have also agreed to pay the commission the agents of Pepe want. This means we are still within our transfer budget. Ridiculous if true because this plays out perfectly for us :lol::lol:
 

beingshe7don

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2016
Messages
2,735
So there is no guarantee he will join United, but you guarantee he won't join United? The only one speaking nonsense is you. I don't think others have ever said Sancho is a guarantee next season. People are simply saying if the strategy is to go for Sancho, people would rather do that then just end up with a poor man's version of Sancho.
So I don't think you understand English for one because I said that there's no guarantee that Sancho will join United (which is a fact). Also, in my opinion, I think he won't join United... because I feel that there will be other lucrative options that may come by next year (and yes, being at Dortmund should be considered one of them)

You do realize that the last recognized RW we signed, was Valencia back in 2009. Since then we've had to use Lingard, Mata, Dalot, Ashley Young, Rashford (neither of whom are actually RW). You could argue that we bought Depay and Angel Di Maria but neither of them actually played on the RW. They were predominately used on the left side.

As for Sancho's options, no doubt he's someone whose grounded and would strategically choose where to go next. But what makes you think that United would be the best position for him? All the options you mentioned were from the PL. For all you know, he wouldn't want to come to the PL.
Juventus may look to freshen things up next season and go for Sancho. There's a high chance they could lose Dybala.
Also, Bayern have just moved on Ribery and Robben and are looking to have their positions filled up. The natural progression of most Dortmund players is to end up at Bayern, so they could also be an option.
Chelsea, as you mentioned will look to spend big next season since they lost Hazard and will try to get a marquee player and Sancho would be that marquee player who could play for them for years to come especially if they qualify for Europe again with Lampard in-charge.
PSG is another team which cannot be taken out of the equation. They are constantly on the watch out for superstar caliber players especially if they move Neymar on. If Liverpool lose Salah to Real or PSG next year, they will be in the market for a RW and considering how dormant they've been in the market, they could use up the money they haven't spent in this summer for next summer.
Lastly, Real Madrid, who have already had a bad preseason with the 7-2 drubbing by Atletico. They will continue spending to try and win the La Liga again. Very few players have refused to turn down Real in the past if they come calling, I don't think Sancho could resist.

There you go, I've mentioned 6 teams who are in a better position than us who could persuade Sancho to join them instead of us. And as stated earlier, he could remain at Dortmund to further improve on himself. Last but not the least, Sancho's worth is around 90 - 100m at the moment. If he continues to improve, he will be worth around 120m or so and do you think Ed or the board will be convinced to spend that much on him?
 

JazzG

Resident Arse.
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
2,682
How many years are in between though? Pointless comparison given the change in the market. Or should we compare Pogba with Vieira?

Crazy money still.
I’m just waiting for someone to point out that Pepe’s fee is almost as much as Real Madrid paid to sign Ronaldo :lol:

Kike reckons the fee agreed isn’t as high as being quoted, who knows though. Outside of PSG though he was seen as the best player in France last season, going to command a high fee. We may also pay a premium because we are trying to sign top players with no CL football for the last 3 years.

Let’s see if we can get this over the line though, massive transfer for us if we can. Get Tierney & a CB (even on loan) and I think top 4 is back on.

I am just a bit puzzled as to why Arsenal are prepared to pay over 70mil for Pepe and yet supposedly only bid 40mil for Zaha who admits to being a huge Arsenal fan; Maybe they were put off by Palace playing hardball with us on AWB but you would have to think Zaha would hit the ground running and a bid of 60mil would have been worth a try.
Palace want the deal to be front loaded, which doesn’t work for us (or most clubs for that matter) and I think Pepe is younger and for many has a higher ceiling.

I agree though with Zaha three is less risk and more likely he’d settle in quicker. However I do think Pepe could become a 15-20 goals a season man and Zaha that seems less likely.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
44,101
Comparing a 2012 fee with a 2019 fee. Besides, Arsenal are paying in instalments. Pepe was the fourth highest scorer in all Europe last season, and second highest scorer in Ligue 1 ahead of Neymar and Cavani, and he is only 24. Very good deal for Arsenal.
Is there some kind of clause that allows them to cancel the remaining payments if the player doesn't do well? Because if not, it's still a 72M transfer, it just enables Arsenal to sign him now with their tight budget. Also, Hazard won the league for Lille and was the league's best player of the year, twice. He was chased by a host of top clubs. I was comparing a lot more than just the fee.
 

JazzG

Resident Arse.
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
2,682
Is there some kind of clause that allows them to cancel the remaining payments if the player doesn't do well? Because if not, it's still a 72M transfer, it just enables Arsenal to sign him now with their tight budget. Also, Hazard won the league for Lille and was the league's best player of the year, twice. He was chased by a host of top clubs. I was comparing a lot more than just the fee.
Hazard had a buyout clause in his contract, so his price was fixed and I remember like 5 or 6 clubs agreed with the fee but as Chelsea had won the CL and were offering him most wages he joined them. Also when Hazard played in France the current PSG project was just starting. For example the next season Montpellier won the league with Giroud finishing top scorer. Outside of PSG many regarded Pepe as the best player in the league, helped them finish 2nd behind PSG. I wouldn't regard Pepe a talent like Hazard either.

No there is never a clause like that, you pay the full fee no matter what.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
44,101
Hmm fair enough, I forgot or didnt know about the clause, I did remember he milked the transfer saga a bit like Griezmann.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
Don't really understand where the complaints about his touch and dribbling are coming from tbh.
Probably the same guys that said AWB and James aren’t technical and can’t dribble either
 

JazzG

Resident Arse.
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
2,682
Didn't he announce it social media or something? I remember that actually, everyone eagerly awaiting what his choice was :lol:
 

Mastadon

New Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Messages
769
Supports
Arsenal
Have to say I’m really shocked by this a 70m-80m signing straight out of nowhere. What a crazy move if the club pulls it off from a 45m budget to a signing like this with no warning. I know nothing about this guy apart from what I’ve seen in YouTube reels but we need a winger as badly as we need a central defender.

I hope there are more similar deals in the pipeline. What a blow for Zaha though publicly trying to force a move through only for us to sign his international team mate. My only problem with this signing would be Pepe is clearly second choice as we did make a few bids for Zaha.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,024
Location
France
Hazard had a buyout clause in his contract, so his price was fixed and I remember like 5 or 6 clubs agreed with the fee but as Chelsea had won the CL and were offering him most wages he joined them. Also when Hazard played in France the current PSG project was just starting. For example the next season Montpellier won the league with Giroud finishing top scorer. Outside of PSG many regarded Pepe as the best player in the league, helped them finish 2nd behind PSG. I wouldn't regard Pepe a talent like Hazard either.

No there is never a clause like that, you pay the full fee no matter what.
He didn't, they are illegal in France.
 

giorno

boob novice
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
26,749
Supports
Real Madrid
Have to say I’m really shocked by this a 70m-80m signing straight out of nowhere. What a crazy move if the club pulls it off from a 45m budget to a signing like this with no warning. I know nothing about this guy apart from what I’ve seen in YouTube reels but we need a winger as badly as we need a central defender.

I hope there are more similar deals in the pipeline. What a blow for Zaha though publicly trying to force a move through only for us to sign his international team mate. My only problem with this signing would be Pepe is clearly second choice as we did make a few bids for Zaha.
None anywhere near what you're spending on Pepe. Seems clear to me you just didn't rate Zaha that much actually. Or simply rate Pepe a lot
 

Mastadon

New Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Messages
769
Supports
Arsenal
None anywhere near what you're spending on Pepe. Seems clear to me you just didn't rate Zaha that much actually. Or simply rate Pepe a lot
From what little info is available Palace wanted money up front while Lille are accepting it staggered and with add ons. I do believe the interest in Zaha was genuine and if we had managed to strike a deal we wouldn’t be signing Pepe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.