100m budget for 2019 Summer window

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,699
@ivaldo getting my knives out mate. Be ready :)

Looks like all the bid which you claimed we did has been total BS.
Does it? I can't wait for you to demonstrate it! :lol: I've got a lovely little prediction post I made earlier which I think should sum you up nicely.
 
Last edited:

dasty

Full Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2013
Messages
1,126
So we only spent a little bit more money than Newcastle under Ashley the worst owner in EPL, and are heavily outspent by Arsenal under Stan "profits only" Kroenke as well as the ever stingy Levy. Good times ahead.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,411
£70m net this summer and roughly the same last year?

We aren't building a squad on that type of budget. We'll lose more than we gain because any real player wont stick around to watch us sign 2 players every summer and hope for top 4.

We've lost Herrera and Fellaini and we didn't buy a midfielder, Lukaku arguably our only real striker is leaving again without a replacement. Next summer it will be Pogba, we'll just keep going round in circles.
 

macheda14

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2009
Messages
4,646
Location
London
So we've spent less (net) than Arsenal - yes they've stretched Pepe over 5 years, but still.
 

bond19821982

Last Man Standing champion 2019/20
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
10,426
Location
Nnc
Does it? I can't wait for you to demonstrate it! :lol:
You can keep believing what you want. Fact is we just have spent 70m to this minute. Whether you go by my logic or your logic, we simply don't have the money. So stop arguing and accept you were wrong all along.
 

gica_7

Full Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2012
Messages
709
Location
Istanbul
Don't think we had this budget, we already spent over 100M and it's clear we tried to get at least one more midfielder in but somehow were unable to, either because other teams asking insane fees or the players weren't interest. It's frustrating but I don't think it's down to our budget constraints.
I don't think we did try. It is the same story for the last 3 summer windows. First it was Perisic, last year it was centre back, this summer it is midfield. Club always briefs the media that the targets were not available for the right price and I don't believe it anymore. We just don't make the effort or we are not doing this properly. I don't know which but it isn't right.

Okey, Longstaff is nowhere near 50 million, but is he the only one? Find someone else. Our squad is not like 2008. We need signings, we do not have CL, we are not as appealing as we were, so of course we have to overpay. It's not like we are building a stadium and have budget constraints. To get back to where you are, you have to overpay a little.

We are talking about a rebuild for the last 3-4 years. It is not happening. It will never happen with this clueless board. I am tired of this.
 

crackers0seven

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
324
Location
ireland
Thursday night's with long journeys /weekend football ,this squad is going to struggle.Its certain we will get injuries to key players too. Top 4 massive ask and I think not in reach for our light midfield and weak front line. Nearly better targeting only EL this season as stupid as that might sound at this stage
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,628
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
No worries, Ajax nearly made the CL final with 90 million euro's last year.
 

Bestietom

Full Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
8,021
Location
Ireland
In
Maguire = 80 million
Wan Bissaka = 50 million
James = 15 million

Total = 145 Million

Out
Lukaku = 77 million

Total Spent = 68 million

Now for a club ( one of the biggest in the world) that needs rebuilding, do you feel we have done enough. There are other teams who will now pass us by. Sorry but we are weaker in Midfield and forwards than last season.
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,699
You can keep believing what you want. Fact is we just have spent 70m to this minute. Whether you go by my logic or your logic, we simply don't have the money. So stop arguing and accept you were wrong all along.
I can and will. You keep believing we didn’t bid for those players, despite it being accepted as common knowledge.
 

Dolf

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2016
Messages
2,892
Location
Amsterdam
Should have gone for Ziyech. He desperately wants to move to a top club so I think he wouldn't demand huge wages. Fits our new style of football and can play on the right. Would only cost around 30m too.
 

Lynty

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Messages
3,094
If it were true the can someone explain how we'd of balanced the books had the Lukaku/Dybala swap gone through?

It was bollocks you idiots!!
I think you fail to understand how big business budgets are handled. There isnt a bank account with Ole's name on with exactly £100m in.

Deficits are balanced against forecast profits and expenditure.

If a chance to sign Dybala appeared that would only send us £50m over budget, you call your finance team and tell them to find away to balance the books.

Should have gone for Ziyech. He desperately wants to move to a top club so I think he wouldn't demand huge wages. Fits our new style of football and can play on the right. Would only cost around 30m too.
30m for Leicester, 50m for us.


Overall I'm confident going into this season. Top 4, a good run in Europe and positive football.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
I think you fail to understand how big business budgets are handled. There isnt a bank account with Ole's name on with exactly £100m in.

Deficits are balanced against forecast profits and expenditure.

If a chance to sign Dybala appeared that would only send us £50m over budget, you call your finance team and tell them to find away to balance the books.
Right? WTF are you quoting me for? I'm saying that the 100m budget was bollocks
 

Lynty

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Messages
3,094
Right? WTF are you quoting me for? I'm saying that the 100m budget was bollocks
I'm saying a £100m budget looks likely.

Just because we could squeeze extra out if needed (most likely at the expense of future spending) doesn't mean its bollocks.
 

Denis79

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
7,776
In
Maguire = 80 million
Wan Bissaka = 50 million
James = 15 million

Total = 145 Million

Out
Lukaku = 77 million

Total Spent = 68 million

Now for a club ( one of the biggest in the world) that needs rebuilding, do you feel we have done enough. There are other teams who will now pass us by. Sorry but we are weaker in Midfield and forwards than last season.
If it stops there it's a joke, 30M last summer 70 this, doesn't show any intent to get us out of this rot.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
I'm saying a £100m budget looks likely.

Just because we could squeeze extra out if needed (most likely at the expense of future spending) doesn't mean its bollocks.
But a 100m budget isn't a 100m budget if it becomes 150m is it. I would think it's obvious we dont have a bottomless pit but I would think it's equally obvious that there wasn't a specific budget either
 

Bestietom

Full Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
8,021
Location
Ireland
We need a replacement for lukaku( upgrade) and a top midfielder before 5pm.??? Else forget about top 4.
 

JoaquinJoaquin

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
8,600
I bet half of you lot that are complaining about not replacing Lukaku are the same that bashed him. The fact remains that he is a very good player who scored a lot of goals for us since he signed who just doesn't fit in Ole's system. The fact that we didn't sign a proper CF BEFORE selling Lukaku tells you a lot about the club's "ambitions" and I just don't see why we didn't go for a Icardi swap plus cash deal at least
It's not even about selling Lukaku. It's the fact we lost 2 midfielders AND Lukaku and haven't replaced any.
 

MUFC OK

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
7,216
£70m net spend. Talk of us going back in for Longstaff but stopping at £30m, you hate to see it :wenger:
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,939
Location
France
I'm saying a £100m budget looks likely.

Just because we could squeeze extra out if needed (most likely at the expense of future spending) doesn't mean its bollocks.
100m net is unlikely to be a budget because it's what we can roughly afford. And I wouldn't be surprised if you use shares of revenue instead of a figure like 100m.
 

Tel074

New Member
Joined
May 8, 2019
Messages
1,531
Guys the sooner we all realise that we will never ever be a super power while the Glaziers are at the club the better . Woodward gets his abuse and rightly so but he's simply doing the job that the owners want ..

These parasites are bleeding the club dry and it's taking most fans a long time to realise this .. We arnt even a top 4 club anymore and honestly I don't blame Pogba DDG etc for wanting to look at other options .

Our club is a mess and I'm not even sure what we can do to get rid of this family .

We love United but our owners don't
 

MUFC OK

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
7,216
£70m net this summer and roughly the same last year?

We aren't building a squad on that type of budget. We'll lose more than we gain because any real player wont stick around to watch us sign 2 players every summer and hope for top 4.

We've lost Herrera and Fellaini and we didn't buy a midfielder, Lukaku arguably our only real striker is leaving again without a replacement. Next summer it will be Pogba, we'll just keep going round in circles.
Next summer I'd put good money on:

Pogba out for £150m, leaving us £220m to spend. We will Sancho - £120m, Longstaff £50m and a CAM/ST for £50m.
 

Johan07

Full Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2017
Messages
1,936
In
Maguire = 80 million
Wan Bissaka = 50 million
James = 15 million

Total = 145 Million

Out
Lukaku = 77 million

Total Spent = 68 million

Now for a club ( one of the biggest in the world) that needs rebuilding, do you feel we have done enough. There are other teams who will now pass us by. Sorry but we are weaker in Midfield and forwards than last season.
The "net spend" stuff is such crap. It means nothing. That said; I will be extremely disappointed if we dont get in one more defensively oriented CM today and a stop-gap replacement for Lukaku would be OK as well. That would make it an OK/decent window. So far its not enough and one really needs to wonder why OGS does not seem to want to upgrade the midfield.
 

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
In
Maguire = 80 million
Wan Bissaka = 50 million
James = 15 million

Total = 145 Million

Out
Lukaku = 77 million

Total Spent = 68 million

Now for a club ( one of the biggest in the world) that needs rebuilding, do you feel we have done enough. There are other teams who will now pass us by. Sorry but we are weaker in Midfield and forwards than last season.
Add in the Fellaini sale please. I want to see it even worse show these owners exactly what they are. Leeches
 

IAN HEALY

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 23, 2018
Messages
17
Day after the summer window closed last year, didnt Woodward come out and say we 100m set aside for Varane but couldn't get the deal done. Now 12 months later thats our entire budget and even that wont be spent, yet the expectation is we will be a better sqaud.
 

sun_tzu

The Art of Bore
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
19,536
Location
Still waiting for the Youthquake
In
Maguire = 80 million
Wan Bissaka = 50 million
James = 15 million

Total = 145 Million

Out
Lukaku = 77 million

Total Spent = 68 million

Now for a club ( one of the biggest in the world) that needs rebuilding, do you feel we have done enough. There are other teams who will now pass us by. Sorry but we are weaker in Midfield and forwards than last season.
Sell pogba and the galzers have a nice profit then...
 

christinaa

Gossip Girl
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
11,557
Supports
There's only one United!
In
Maguire = 80 million
Wan Bissaka = 50 million
James = 15 million

Total = 145 Million

Out
Lukaku = 77 million

Total Spent = 68 million

Now for a club ( one of the biggest in the world) that needs rebuilding, do you feel we have done enough. There are other teams who will now pass us by. Sorry but we are weaker in Midfield and forwards than last season.
Add to the above that if Zaha is sold we get the cash that we spent on James, so total spent = 53 million.

Glazers will be happy.
 

Stacks

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
10,905
Location
Between a rock and Gibraltar
The "net spend" stuff is such crap. It means nothing. That said; I will be extremely disappointed if we dont get in one more defensively oriented CM today and a stop-gap replacement for Lukaku would be OK as well. That would make it an OK/decent window. So far its not enough and one really needs to wonder why OGS does not seem to want to upgrade the midfield.
Net spend isn't crap as we have sold a proven GS and been forced to rely on inconsistent attackers or ones with no appearances. If we had liquid funds available surely we would compensate for our losses with a more reliable strategy. Sell to buy is low level especially when having to sell experience and rely on youth
 

MuppetKing

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
1
I think we have a good squad. Maybe not good enough to win the title yet, or most likely even challenge, but still good enough to get top 4 and challenge for the title in 2020-21 onwards.

Firstly, we have a goalkeeper in De Gea who at his best is the best goalkeeper in the world. Its just a matter of whether he can regain his form from 2014-15 to 2017-18 and before, and judging by the solid pre-season he’s had, I back him to do so.

We also have the second best defence in the league, in my opinion. Maguire gets into every team in the league due to his defensive and distributional abilities, hence why City wanted him and Wan-Bissaka does the same aside from Liverpool due to his defensive abilities, potential and high energy. Along with that, Shaw and Lindelöf have great potential and judging by last season, both are fully on track to realise it.

Moving on to the midfield, McTominay is yet another player with a high ceiling and just like Shaw and Lindelöf, is on the right track to realise it and reach the top. His commitment is second to none as well, something any player needs to make it to the top of the game. Needless to say, Pogba is world class and would get into any team in the world when on song, let alone the league.

Most likely, the three who will likely play in front of Pogba and McTominay to start the season will be James, Lingard and Martial. Sharing an opinion with most United fans, I am not happy that Lingard is going to start the season as our number 10 due to the obvious reason that he’s not good enough for a team with title winning aspirations. However, Martial and James are two players with huge talent and potential, along with an astronomical amount of pace to burn. Martial has already shown his quality in various games over the last few seasons and if used right and mentored properly, could be magnificent this season. James has been extremely exciting during pre-season and showed that hyped up pace was no joke. While he’s been lacking in end product, that is something coachable and improvable.

Finally, Rashford is yet another one with massive potential. I honestly believe that if he improves his finishing, he will go on to be the 25 goal a season striker that we’ve been craving since Van Persie. He constantly gets into the right positions to score and has already outscored many greats when they were at his tender age of 21 (Henry, Drogba etc).

However, on a slightly negative note, we are lacking in depth a little in midfield and upfront if we don’t sign Mandzukic. This is not necessarily a bad thing though, as we have four very talented players coming out of the academy ready to be understudies to the first 11 in Garner, Gomes, Chong and especially Greenwood. In addition, players like Romero, Tuanzebe, Pereira, Mata, Sanchez and should we sign him, Mandzukic are more than capable backups who can make a positive difference too.

What i’m trying to say is that this is a talented squad that we have at our disposal who I think are capable of challenging for and even winning the title if not this campaign, then in future seasons. Its really not all doom and gloom if you try to positively break down our current squad as i’ve done, so lets be positive about this season! :devil:
 

Johan07

Full Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2017
Messages
1,936
Net spend isn't crap as we have sold a proven GS and been forced to rely on inconsistent attackers or ones with no appearances. If we had liquid funds available surely we would compensate for our losses with a more reliable strategy. Sell to buy is low level especially when having to sell experience and rely on youth
You are correct, its more like bullshit.
We have cash at hand at almost 200m according to the last quarterly statement. Its almost financially irresponsible to be fair to operate with that much cash even if our turnover is bigger than anyone elses in the PL.
The transfer fees is not the issue. Our wage bill is. I seriously dont get why people cant get around to this fact. We have signed Rashford and (most likely) De Gea up to new expensive contracts as well as not paying Maguire (especially) and Wan-Bissaka exactly peanuts. We have lost Herrera who was on nothing money and Fellaini who got a big fecking raise from Mourinho but was just paid for like 6 months. So we have increased our wage bill yet again and we will prob be touching 310m or something now.
"Net spend" means nothing.
EDIT
I forgot Valencia who actually was on a half-decent contract as well. We will still have increased our wage bill this year. If Lukaku does leave I guess we will be at more status quo.
 

beecks

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
991
Location
office in bergen
So thats:

In: Maguire, AWB og DJ = 145 mill
Out: Fellaini (10 million) , Rojo (25 million), Lukaku (75 million), Darmian (guessing 5 million) and If Zaha gets sold (15 million sell on fee from CP) = 130 million

= 15 million net spend.

Would love us to win the "Net spend league" this year. Any other clubs close to that?
 

Lynty

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Messages
3,094
But a 100m budget isn't a 100m budget if it becomes 150m is it. I would think it's obvious we dont have a bottomless pit but I would think it's equally obvious that there wasn't a specific budget either
It's called going over budget. E.g. A&E departmnet at the Manchester Royal Infirmry could go over budget and still be operational. You can renovate a house and go over budget by £20k. In these terms a budget is a target to stay within, for whatever reason. Going over budget has consequences. Just becuase you can't see these consequences, doens't mean they are not there.

Someone at the club obviously set a budget which was deemed sensible for this transfer window. Whether the motivation was penny pinching, lack of faith in the manager, contentment in our league position, forecast expenditure, keeping financial reserves (maybe they set aside the Sancho money for next year) or just greed from the Glazers, we don't know.

But every move we've made in this window indicates we have a budget somewhere in the region of £100m.
 

MattyB1986

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2014
Messages
1,122
I think I read somewhere not sure if it is factual or not because I haven't had time to check, and at work at present. But swear I read our net spend has avg £50 mil a season since the Glazers took over.
 

future2future

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 23, 2018
Messages
138
Location
The Netherlands
Should have gone for Ziyech. He desperately wants to move to a top club so I think he wouldn't demand huge wages. Fits our new style of football and can play on the right. Would only cost around 30m too.
Can still be done today but as you know as a fellow dutchman, Ziyech is very picky about which clubs he wants to transfer to, so I'm not sure he wouldn't opt to stay at Ajax
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,638
Location
London
I'm saying a £100m budget looks likely.

Just because we could squeeze extra out if needed (most likely at the expense of future spending) doesn't mean its bollocks.
Explain then how the deal for Dybala (which apparently Juve accepted) makes sense then? Cause that signing would have nullified the money we got from Lukaku.

We spent less than 100m because Dybala didn't want to come here. If he would have accepted coming here, our net spend would have been 140-150m pounds (not counting agent fees and signing on fee).

So yep, it was and it is bollocks.
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
Explain then how the deal for Dybala (which apparently Juve accepted) makes sense then? Cause that signing would have nullified the money we got from Lukaku.

We spent less than 100m because Dybala didn't want to come here. If he would have accepted coming here, our net spend would have been 140-150m pounds (not counting agent fees and signing on fee).

So yep, it was and it is bollocks.
Because it was opportunistic. Essentially trading an asset for an asset.
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
Point missed - if this went through, we wouldn’t have got a fee for Lukuku, and so our net spend would have been £150m, or thereabouts.

There’s money there to spend.
So why are we not spending it then? Why wait to sell Lukaku?
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
So why are we not spending it then? Why wait to sell Lukaku?
On who?

Therein lies the issue.

We had to wait to sell Lukuku, because there would be room in the squad if the deal didn’t go through. Let’s be honest, most of us didn’t think Inter would actually come up with the money - I thought he would be here this season (although very glad he’s not).
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,638
Location
London
Because it was opportunistic. Essentially trading an asset for an asset.
Yes, but it would have set our transfer budget to 140-155m pounds (initially it was reported Lukaku + 15m for Dybala).

United has around 200m pounds in the bank. It is financially irresponsible to just leave the money there (inflation and all that). The reasons why we have not to spend more is if the main targets didn't want to come here (or either the clubs or the players required an absurd amount of money for them). But providing that we wanted a player, the club sold him at a reasonable price and the player asked for reasonable wages (reasonable doesn't mean cheap, see Maguire), we would have signed that player. Case, Dybala. We wanted him, Juve was reasonable, but Dybala apparently asked for 350k+ salary (or didn't want to come at all).
 

Red_Orchestra

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
787
Should have gone for Ziyech. He desperately wants to move to a top club so I think he wouldn't demand huge wages. Fits our new style of football and can play on the right. Would only cost around 30m too.
I agree, we should've gone for players on the cheap like Ziyech and Brandt who would easily walk into our lineup.

I just can't believe we're going into yet another season with Mata and Lingard in our starting lineup, It's a tough pill to swallow especially when all of our rivals are upgrading their midfield and attack.